Punctuation and Predicates in Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14067v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:53:30 GMT
• Title: Punctuation and Predicates in Language Models
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the necessity and sufficiency of punctuation tokens across layers in GPT-2, DeepSeek, and Gemma.<n>We investigate whether different reasoning rules are processed differently by LLMs.<n>Our findings offer new insight into the internal mechanisms of punctuation usage and reasoning in LLMs.
• Score: 0.5937476291232802
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we explore where information is collected and how it is propagated throughout layers in large language models (LLMs). We begin by examining the surprising computational importance of punctuation tokens which previous work has identified as attention sinks and memory aids. Using intervention-based techniques, we evaluate the necessity and sufficiency (for preserving model performance) of punctuation tokens across layers in GPT-2, DeepSeek, and Gemma. Our results show stark model-specific differences: for GPT-2, punctuation is both necessary and sufficient in multiple layers, while this holds far less in DeepSeek and not at all in Gemma. Extending beyond punctuation, we ask whether LLMs process different components of input (e.g., subjects, adjectives, punctuation, full sentences) by forming early static summaries reused across the network, or if the model remains sensitive to changes in these components across layers. Extending beyond punctuation, we investigate whether different reasoning rules are processed differently by LLMs. In particular, through interchange intervention and layer-swapping experiments, we find that conditional statements (if, then), and universal quantification (for all) are processed very differently. Our findings offer new insight into the internal mechanisms of punctuation usage and reasoning in LLMs and have implications for interpretability.

Related papers

• Inside the LLM Word Factory [8.254230288283258]
  We study detokenization, the process where models reconcile subwords into word-level representations.<n>We use Llama2-7B to generalize a two-stage process at Layer 1.<n>We also provide a probe for determining the success of the detokenization process based on early-layer activations alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T10:36:20Z)
• Speech Discrete Tokens or Continuous Features? A Comparative Analysis for Spoken Language Understanding in SpeechLLMs [59.230858581944425]
  Two dominant approaches have emerged for speech processing: discrete tokens and continuous features.<n>We compare self-supervised learning (SSL)-based discrete and continuous features under the same experimental settings.<n>Our findings reveal that continuous features generally outperform discrete tokens in various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T10:16:07Z)
• LayerCake: Token-Aware Contrastive Decoding within Large Language Model Layers [53.43862310647276]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at natural language understanding and generation but remain vulnerable to factual errors.<n>We introduce a token-aware, layer-localized contrastive decoding method that aligns specific token types with their most influential transformer layers to improve factual generation.<n>Our method requires no additional training or model modification, and experiments demonstrate that our method consistently improves factuality across multiple LLMs and various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T14:35:43Z)
• Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models [49.16690802656554]
  We find that Multilingual factual models struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages.<n>We propose a linear shortcut method that bypasses computations in the final layers, enhancing both prediction accuracy and cross-lingual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T19:43:10Z)
• Contextualize-then-Aggregate: Circuits for In-Context Learning in Gemma-2 2B [46.99314622487279]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) is an intriguing ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>We use causal interventions to identify information flow in Gemma-2 2B for five naturalistic ICL tasks.<n>We find that the model infers task information using a two-step strategy we call contextualize-then-aggregate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:33:55Z)
• Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models [22.704926222438456]
  We investigate the quality of intermediate representations in large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that intermediate layers often yield more informative representations for downstream tasks than the final layers.<n>Our results illuminate the internal mechanics of LLMs and guide strategies for architectural optimization and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:48:51Z)
• Gradient Localization Improves Lifelong Pretraining of Language Models [32.29298047707914]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on web-scale text corpora have been shown to capture world knowledge in their parameters. In this work, we examine two types of knowledge relating to temporally sensitive entities and demonstrate that each type is localized to different sets of parameters within the LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T05:43:50Z)
• Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semantics [50.982315553104975]
  We investigate the bottom-up evolution of lexical semantics for a popular large language model, namely Llama2. Our experiments show that the representations in lower layers encode lexical semantics, while the higher layers, with weaker semantic induction, are responsible for prediction. This is in contrast to models with discriminative objectives, such as mask language modeling, where the higher layers obtain better lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T13:14:47Z)
• Adapting Large Language Models for Document-Level Machine Translation [46.370862171452444]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Recent research indicates that moderately-sized LLMs often outperform larger ones after task-specific fine-tuning. This study focuses on adapting LLMs for document-level machine translation (DocMT) for specific language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:29:13Z)
• Breaking Down Word Semantics from Pre-trained Language Models through Layer-wise Dimension Selection [0.0]
  This paper aims to disentangle semantic sense from BERT by applying a binary mask to middle outputs across the layers. The disentangled embeddings are evaluated through binary classification to determine if the target word in two different sentences has the same meaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T11:07:19Z)
• How to Handle Different Types of Out-of-Distribution Scenarios in Computational Argumentation? A Comprehensive and Fine-Grained Field Study [59.13867562744973]
  This work systematically assesses LMs' capabilities for out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. We find that the efficacy of such learning paradigms varies with the type of OOD. Specifically, while ICL excels for domain shifts, prompt-based fine-tuning surpasses for topic shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T11:15:47Z)
• Don't Judge a Language Model by Its Last Layer: Contrastive Learning with Layer-Wise Attention Pooling [6.501126898523172]
  Recent pre-trained language models (PLMs) achieved great success on many natural language processing tasks through learning linguistic features and contextualized sentence representation. This paper introduces the attention-based pooling strategy, which enables the model to preserve layer-wise signals captured in each layer and learn digested linguistic features for downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-13T13:09:49Z)
• A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
  We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification. The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample. A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z)
• Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge [59.22170796793179]
  Transformers Language Models (TLMs) were tested on a benchmark for the textitdynamic estimation of thematic fit Our results show that TLMs can reach performances that are comparable to those achieved by SDM. However, additional analysis consistently suggests that TLMs do not capture important aspects of event knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T20:52:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.