Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09563v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:48:51 GMT
• Title: Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models
• Authors: Oscar Skean, Md Rifat Arefin, Yann LeCun, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the quality of intermediate representations in large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that intermediate layers often yield more informative representations for downstream tasks than the final layers.<n>Our results illuminate the internal mechanics of LLMs and guide strategies for architectural optimization and training.
• Score: 22.704926222438456
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding what defines a good representation in large language models (LLMs) is fundamental to both theoretical understanding and practical applications. In this paper, we investigate the quality of intermediate representations in various LLM architectures, including Transformers and State Space Models (SSMs). We find that intermediate layers often yield more informative representations for downstream tasks than the final layers. To measure the representation quality, we adapt and apply a suite of metrics - such as prompt entropy, curvature, and augmentation-invariance - originally proposed in other contexts. Our empirical study reveals significant architectural differences, how representations evolve throughout training, and how factors like input randomness and prompt length affect each layer. Notably, we observe a bimodal pattern in the entropy of some intermediate layers and consider potential explanations tied to training data. Overall, our results illuminate the internal mechanics of LLMs and guide strategies for architectural optimization and training.

Related papers

• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks. We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Models [28.304269706993942]
  We show that intermediate layers can encode even richer representations, often improving performance on a wide range of downstream tasks. Our framework highlights how each model layer balances information compression and signal preservation. These findings challenge the standard focus on final-layer embeddings and open new directions for model analysis and optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T05:03:42Z)
• Understanding Layer Significance in LLM Alignment [23.582520695083588]
  We propose identifying which layers within large language models are most critical to the alignment process. Experimental results reveal that, despite substantial differences in alignment datasets, the important layers of a model exhibit nearly 90% overlap. The results also indicate that freezing non-essential layers improves overall model performance, while selectively tuning the most critical layers significantly enhances fine-tuning efficiency with minimal performance loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T13:47:05Z)
• Interpreting token compositionality in LLMs: A robustness analysis [10.777646083061395]
  Constituent-Aware Pooling (CAP) is a methodology designed to analyse how large language models process linguistic structures. CAP intervenes in model activations through constituent-based pooling at various model levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T18:10:50Z)
• Persistent Topological Features in Large Language Models [0.6597195879147556]
  We introduce persistence similarity, a new metric that quantifies the persistence and transformation of topological features. Unlike traditional similarity measures, our approach captures the entire evolutionary trajectory of these features. As a practical application, we leverage persistence similarity to identify and prune redundant layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T19:46:23Z)
• The Mechanics of Conceptual Interpretation in GPT Models: Interpretative Insights [10.777646083061395]
  We introduce concept editing'', an innovative variation of knowledge editing that uncovers conceptualisation mechanisms within large language models. We analyse the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Multi-Head Attention (MHA), and hidden state components of transformer models. Our work highlights the complex, layered nature of semantic processing in LLMs and the challenges of isolating and modifying specific concepts within these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T18:50:08Z)
• Representations as Language: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Interpretability [7.2129390689756185]
  Large scale neural models show impressive performance across a wide array of linguistic tasks. Despite this they remain, largely, black-boxes, inducing vector-representations of their input that prove difficult to interpret. We introduce a novel approach to interpretability that looks at the mapping a model learns from sentences to representations as a kind of language in its own right.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T16:14:00Z)
• Entropy Guided Extrapolative Decoding to Improve Factuality in Large Language Models [55.45444773200529]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive natural language capabilities but suffer from hallucination. Recent work has focused on decoding techniques to improve factuality during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T19:45:35Z)
• Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge at Different Layers? [57.04803703952721]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks.<n>However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood.<n>We introduce the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:56:40Z)
• A Theoretical Analysis of Self-Supervised Learning for Vision Transformers [66.08606211686339]
  Masked autoencoders (MAE) and contrastive learning (CL) capture different types of representations. We study the training dynamics of one-layer softmax-based vision transformers (ViTs) on both MAE and CL objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T17:24:03Z)
• Masked Image Modeling with Local Multi-Scale Reconstruction [54.91442074100597]
  Masked Image Modeling (MIM) achieves outstanding success in self-supervised representation learning. Existing MIM models conduct reconstruction task only at the top layer of encoder. We design local multi-scale reconstruction, where the lower and upper layers reconstruct fine-scale and coarse-scale supervision signals respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T13:42:04Z)
• The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer models [43.16765170255552]
  Large transformers are powerful architectures used for self-supervised data analysis across various data types. We show that the semantic structure of the dataset emerges from a sequence of transformations between one representation and the next. We show that the semantic information of the dataset is better expressed at the end of the first peak, and this phenomenon can be observed across many models trained on diverse datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T07:50:26Z)
• A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
  We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification. The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample. A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.