GRILE: A Benchmark for Grammar Reasoning and Explanation in Romanian LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14279v1
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:27:06 GMT
- Title: GRILE: A Benchmark for Grammar Reasoning and Explanation in Romanian LLMs
- Abstract summary: We present GRILE, the first open benchmark of 1,151 multiple-choice questions harvested from Romanian-stakes exams.<n> GRILE enables us to probe two complementary abilities of seven state-the-art multilingual and Romanian-specific LLMs.
- Score: 44.99833362998488
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: LLMs (Large language models) have revolutionized NLP (Natural Language Processing), yet their pedagogical value for low-resource languages remains unclear. We present GRILE (Grammar Romanian Inference and Language Explanations) , the first open benchmark of 1,151 multiple-choice questions harvested from Romanian high-stakes exams (National Evaluation, Baccalaureate, university admissions). GRILE enables us to probe two complementary abilities of seven state-of-the-art multilingual and Romanian-specific LLMs: (i) selecting the correct answer, and (ii) producing linguistically accurate explanations. While Gemini 2.5 Pro reaches 83% accuracy, most open-weight models stay below 65%, and 48% of their explanations contain factual or pedagogical flaws according to expert review. A detailed error analysis pinpoints systematic weaknesses in morphology and in applying the latest DOOM3 orthographic norms. All data, code and a public web demo are released to catalyze future research. Our findings expose open challenges for trustworthy educational NLP in low-resource settings and establish GRILE as a new test-bed for controllable explanation generation and evaluation.
Related papers
- Making Large Language Models Speak Tulu: Structured Prompting for an Extremely Low-Resource Language [1.0742675209112622]
We examine whether structured prompts alone can elicit basic conversational ability under controlled prompting.<n>We combine explicit grammar documentation, negative constraints to suppress high-probability tokens from related languages, romanization standardization, and quality-controlled synthetic data generation via self-play.<n>Our approach reduces vocabulary contamination from 80% to 5% while achieving 85% grammatical accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T06:20:09Z) - GreekMMLU: A Native-Sourced Multitask Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models in Greek [27.324768282418102]
GreekMMLU is a native-sourced benchmark for massive language understanding in Greek.<n>We release 16,857 samples and reserve 4,948 samples for a private leaderboard to enable robust and contamination-resistant evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T00:12:18Z) - FEANEL: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Error Analysis in K-12 English Writing [68.23874413455594]
We present the Fine-grained Error ANalysis for English learners (FEANEL) Benchmark.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 essays written by elementary and secondary school students.<n>Each error is annotated by language education experts and categorized by type, severity, and explanatory feedback, using a part-of-speech-based taxonomy they co-developed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T05:17:45Z) - Comparing LLM Text Annotation Skills: A Study on Human Rights Violations in Social Media Data [2.812898346527047]
This study investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot and few-shot annotation of social media posts in Russian and Ukrainian.<n>To evaluate the effectiveness of these models, their annotations are compared against a gold standard set of human double-annotated labels.<n>The study explores the unique patterns of errors and disagreements exhibited by each model, offering insights into their strengths, limitations, and cross-linguistic adaptability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T13:10:47Z) - PolyMath: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning in Multilingual Contexts [79.84059473102778]
PolyMath is a multilingual mathematical reasoning benchmark covering 18 languages and 4 easy-to-hard difficulty levels.<n>Our benchmark ensures difficulty comprehensiveness, language diversity, and high-quality translation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-25T15:39:04Z) - Is Small Language Model the Silver Bullet to Low-Resource Languages Machine Translation? [18.975160361440597]
Low-resource languages (LRLs) lack sufficient linguistic resources and are underrepresented in benchmark datasets.<n>This study systematically evaluates state-of-the-art smaller Large Language Models in 200 languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T13:56:03Z) - MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [86.7047714187813]
MMLU-ProX is a benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark.<n>Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons.<n>To meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z) - Open or Closed LLM for Lesser-Resourced Languages? Lessons from Greek [2.3499129784547663]
We evaluate the performance of open-source (Llama-70b) and closed-source (GPT-4o mini) large language models on seven core NLP tasks with dataset availability.<n>Second, we expand the scope of Greek NLP by reframing Authorship Attribution as a tool to assess potential data usage by LLMs in pre-training.<n>Third, we showcase a legal NLP case study, where a Summarize, Translate, and Embed (STE) methodology outperforms the traditional TF-IDF approach for clustering emphlong legal texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T12:06:16Z) - LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages [8.754506364968394]
The LingOly benchmark is a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models.
We evaluate capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages.
We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T11:50:29Z) - YAYI 2: Multilingual Open-Source Large Language Models [53.92832054643197]
We propose YAYI 2, including both base and chat models, with 30 billion parameters.
YAYI 2 is pre-trained from scratch on a multilingual corpus which contains 2.65 trillion tokens filtered by our pre-training data processing pipeline.
The base model is aligned with human values through supervised fine-tuning with millions of instructions and reinforcement learning from human feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T17:34:47Z) - Native Language Identification with Large Language Models [60.80452362519818]
We show that GPT models are proficient at NLI classification, with GPT-4 setting a new performance record of 91.7% on the benchmark11 test set in a zero-shot setting.
We also show that unlike previous fully-supervised settings, LLMs can perform NLI without being limited to a set of known classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T00:52:15Z) - Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars.
We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English.
Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.