Unbiased Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks in Large Language Models via Conditional Front-Door Adjustment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16910v1
• Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 05:52:39 GMT
• Title: Unbiased Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks in Large Language Models via Conditional Front-Door Adjustment
• Authors: Bo Zhao, Yinghao Zhang, Ziqi Xu, Yongli Ren, Xiuzhen Zhang, Renqiang Luo, Zaiwen Feng, Feng Xia,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing but struggle to perform well on knowledge-intensive tasks.<n>We propose a novel causal prompting framework, Conditional Front-Door Prompting (CFD-Prompting), which enables the unbiased estimation of the causal effect between the query and the answer.
• Score: 14.539964360184086
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing but still struggle to perform well on knowledge-intensive tasks that require deep reasoning and the integration of external knowledge. Although methods such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) have been proposed to enhance LLMs with external knowledge, they still suffer from internal bias in LLMs, which often leads to incorrect answers. In this paper, we propose a novel causal prompting framework, Conditional Front-Door Prompting (CFD-Prompting), which enables the unbiased estimation of the causal effect between the query and the answer, conditional on external knowledge, while mitigating internal bias. By constructing counterfactual external knowledge, our framework simulates how the query behaves under varying contexts, addressing the challenge that the query is fixed and is not amenable to direct causal intervention. Compared to the standard front-door adjustment, the conditional variant operates under weaker assumptions, enhancing both robustness and generalisability of the reasoning process. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs and benchmark datasets demonstrate that CFD-Prompting significantly outperforms existing baselines in both accuracy and robustness.

Related papers

• Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
  Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z)
• Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers [41.58256327940237]
  Proactive Interactive Reasoning transforms Large Language Models into proactive inquirers.<n>PIR targets premise- and intent-level uncertainty through direct interaction with the user.<n>Experiments on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing demonstrate that PIR consistently outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:56:12Z)
• Fact-Checking with Large Language Models via Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency [7.806516365113592]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in applications requiring factual accuracy.<n>While fact-checking can mitigate these errors, existing methods typically retrieve external evidence indiscriminately.<n>We introduce Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency (PCC), a framework that estimates factual confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T21:57:41Z)
• Rethinking LLM Parametric Knowledge as Post-retrieval Confidence for Dynamic Retrieval and Reranking [23.1400319714807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate responses (hallucinations) when faced with questions beyond their knowledge scope.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by leveraging external knowledge, but a critical challenge remains: determining whether retrieved contexts effectively enhance the models ability to answer specific queries.<n>This challenge underscores the importance of knowledge boundary awareness, which current methods-relying on discrete labels or limited signals-fail to address adequately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T09:37:20Z)
• Improving Factuality in LLMs via Inference-Time Knowledge Graph Construction [30.381290814338413]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with producing factually consistent answers due to limitations in their parametric memory.<n>We propose a novel framework that dynamically constructs and expands knowledge graphs (KGs) during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T16:36:40Z)
• Can LLMs Detect Their Confabulations? Estimating Reliability in Uncertainty-Aware Language Models [24.72990207218907]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to generating fluent but incorrect content, known as confabulation.<n>We investigate how in-context information influences model behavior and whether LLMs can identify their unreliable responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T16:12:36Z)
• Exploring LLM Reasoning Through Controlled Prompt Variations [0.9217021281095907]
  We evaluate how well state-of-the-art models maintain logical consistency and correctness when confronted with four categories of prompt perturbations.<n>Our experiments, conducted on thirteen open-source and closed-source LLMs, reveal that introducing irrelevant context within the model's context window significantly degrades performance.<n>Certain perturbations inadvertently trigger chain-of-thought-like reasoning behaviors, even without explicit prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T20:18:50Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reliability via Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling [48.15636223774418]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination stemming from misaligned self-awareness.<n>We propose the Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling framework to integrate fast and slow reasoning systems to harmonize reliability and usability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:16:02Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models for Faithful Integrity Against Opposing Argument [71.33552795870544]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in complex reasoning tasks.<n>They can be easily misled by unfaithful arguments during conversations, even when their original statements are correct.<n>We propose a novel framework, named Alignment for Faithful Integrity with Confidence Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T16:38:21Z)
• TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMs [50.259001311894295]
  We propose a novel TRansformer-based Attribution framework using Contrastive Embeddings called TRACE. We show that TRACE significantly improves the ability to attribute sources accurately, making it a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T07:19:30Z)
• Test-Time Fairness and Robustness in Large Language Models [17.758735680493917]
  Frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) can be socially discriminatory or sensitive to spurious features of their inputs. Existing solutions, which instruct the LLM to be fair or robust, rely on the model's implicit understanding of bias. We show that our prompting strategy, unlike implicit instructions, consistently reduces the bias of frontier LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T20:05:15Z)
• Causal Prompting: Debiasing Large Language Model Prompting based on Front-Door Adjustment [32.12998469814097]
  A novel causal prompting method based on front-door adjustment is proposed to effectively mitigate Large Language Models (LLMs) biases.<n> Experimental results show that the proposed causal prompting approach achieves excellent performance across seven natural language processing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T07:47:34Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
• Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inference [91.66406351103484]
  We propose a novel post-processing approach, rethinking with retrieval (RR) RR retrieves relevant external knowledge based on the reasoning steps obtained from the chain-of-thought prompting. We evaluate the effectiveness of RR through extensive experiments with GPT-3 on three complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-31T22:35:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.