The Accessibility Paradox: How Blind and Low Vision Employees Experience and Negotiate Accessibility in the Technology Industry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18492v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:05:23 GMT
• Title: The Accessibility Paradox: How Blind and Low Vision Employees Experience and Negotiate Accessibility in the Technology Industry
• Authors: Aparajita Marathe, Anne Marie Piper,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on the experiences of BLV workers across various tech companies.<n>We show how the accessibility paradox manifests in their everyday workplace interactions.<n>We offer recommendations for future research and practice.
• Score: 8.22172742670753
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many technology companies aim to improve access and inclusion not only by making their products accessible but also by bringing people with disabilities into the tech workforce. We know less about how accessibility is experienced and negotiated by disabled workers within these organizations. Through interviews with 20 BLV workers across various tech companies, we uncover a persistent misalignment between organizational attempts at accessibility and the current realities of these employees. We introduce the concept of the accessibility paradox, which we define as the inherent tension between the productivity- and profit-driven nature of tech companies and their desire to hire and retain disabled workers. Focusing on the experiences of BLV workers, we show how the accessibility paradox manifests in their everyday workplace interactions, including digital infrastructure, accommodations processes and policies, ability assumptions, and competing priorities. We offer recommendations for future research and practice to understand and improve workplace accessibility and inclusion.

Related papers

• Challenges and Enablers: Remote Work for People with Disabilities in Software Development Teams [5.972661335921587]
  This study investigates how remote work affects people with disabilities (PWDs) in software development teams (SDTs)<n>We conducted an online survey with totalSurveyResponses valid responses, encompassing PWDs, their leaders, and teammates.<n>We carried out 14 structured interviews with software developers who self-identified as having disabilities.<n>Results reveal that, despite the barriers faced by team members with disabilities, their teammates and leaders have a limited perception of the daily challenges involved in sustaining collaborative remote work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T04:05:36Z)
• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• "Accessibility people, you go work on that thing of yours over there": Addressing Disability Inclusion in AI Product Organizations [15.672286378805234]
  We report on an interview study with 25 AI practitioners about how their work processes and artifacts may impact end users with disabilities.<n>We found that practitioners experienced friction when triaging problems at the intersection of responsible AI and accessibility practices.<n>We offer suggestions for new resources and process changes to better support people with disabilities as end users of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T16:08:42Z)
• Fostering Inclusion: A Regional Initiative Uniting Communities to Co-Design Assistive Technologies [0.3374875022248865]
  The presented regional initiative strives to tackle these problems by bringing together people with disabilities, students, researchers, and associations. During different lecture formats at the university, students co-design assistive technologies with people with disabilities. We conducted and analyzed thirteen semi-structured interviews with participants and other involved stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T21:21:50Z)
• The Security and Privacy of Mobile Edge Computing: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective [64.36680481458868]
  Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is a new computing paradigm that enables cloud computing and information technology (IT) services to be delivered at the network's edge. This paper provides a survey of security and privacy in MEC from the perspective of Artificial Intelligence (AI) We focus on new security and privacy issues, as well as potential solutions from the viewpoints of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T07:47:22Z)
• The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
  This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems. It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI. It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies? [65.15780777033109]
  This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies. We show how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless" consent as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability to withhold consent. To meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the policies and practices surrounding the technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:15:07Z)
• A Bottom-Up End-User Intelligent Assistant Approach to Empower Gig Workers against AI Inequality [16.121867459980137]
  We argue that a bottom-up approach that empowers individual workers to access AI-enabled work planning support and share data among a group of workers is a practical way to bridge AI inequality in gig work under the current paradigm of privately owned platforms. This position paper articulates a set of research challenges, potential approaches, and community engagement opportunities, seeking to start a dialogue on this important research topic in the interdisciplinary CHIWORK community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T01:30:30Z)
• Bringing Cognitive Augmentation to Web Browsing Accessibility [69.62988485669146]
  We explore opportunities brought by cognitive augmentation to provide a more natural and accessible web browsing experience. We develop a conceptual framework for supporting BVIP conversational web browsing needs. We describe our early work and prototype that leverages that consider structural and content features only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T14:40:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.