Wrong Model, Right Uncertainty: Spatial Associations for Discrete Data with Misspecification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01776v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 21:22:08 GMT
• Title: Wrong Model, Right Uncertainty: Spatial Associations for Discrete Data with Misspecification
• Authors: David R. Burt, Renato Berlinghieri, Tamara Broderick,
• Abstract summary: We show how to handle spatially varying noise, provide a novel proof of consistency for our proposed estimator.<n>We show empirically that standard approaches can produce unreliable confidence intervals and can even get the sign of an association wrong.
• Score: 9.924172280147625
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Scientists are often interested in estimating an association between a covariate and a binary- or count-valued response. For instance, public health officials are interested in how much disease presence (a binary response per individual) varies as temperature or pollution (covariates) increases. Many existing methods can be used to estimate associations, and corresponding uncertainty intervals, but make unrealistic assumptions in the spatial domain. For instance, they incorrectly assume models are well-specified. Or they assume the training and target locations are i.i.d. -- whereas in practice, these locations are often not even randomly sampled. Some recent work avoids these assumptions but works only for continuous responses with spatially constant noise. In the present work, we provide the first confidence intervals with guaranteed asymptotic nominal coverage for spatial associations given discrete responses, even under simultaneous model misspecification and nonrandom sampling of spatial locations. To do so, we demonstrate how to handle spatially varying noise, provide a novel proof of consistency for our proposed estimator, and use a delta method argument with a Lyapunov central limit theorem. We show empirically that standard approaches can produce unreliable confidence intervals and can even get the sign of an association wrong, while our method reliably provides correct coverage.

Related papers

• Smooth Sailing: Lipschitz-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Spatial Association [26.063765269659076]
  Estimating associations is central to environmental science, epidemiology, and economics.<n>We introduce a method that constructs valid frequentist confidence intervals for associations in spatial settings.<n>Our approach is the first to guarantee nominal coverage in this setting and outperforms existing techniques in both real and simulated experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T23:20:03Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.<n>We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• Simultaneous Inference for Local Structural Parameters with Random Forests [19.014535120129338]
  We construct simultaneous confidence intervals for solutions to conditional moment equations. We obtain several new order-explicit results on the concentration and normal approximation of high-dimensional U.S. As a by-product, we obtain several new order-explicit results on the concentration and normal approximation of high-dimensional U.S.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T15:46:11Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstention [70.83870602967625]
  We develop a principled procedure for determining when a large language model should abstain from responding in a general domain. We leverage conformal prediction techniques to develop an abstention procedure that benefits from rigorous theoretical guarantees on the hallucination rate (error rate) Experimentally, our resulting conformal abstention method reliably bounds the hallucination rate on various closed-book, open-domain generative question answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T11:32:03Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects [1.9253333342733674]
  Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes. We propose a unified and model-agnostic inferential approach for a wide class of partially identified estimands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T08:17:30Z)
• Uncertainty Estimates of Predictions via a General Bias-Variance Decomposition [7.811916700683125]
  We introduce a bias-variance decomposition for proper scores, giving rise to the Bregman Information as the variance term. We showcase the practical relevance of this decomposition on several downstream tasks, including model ensembles and confidence regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T21:24:37Z)
• Nonparametric Conditional Local Independence Testing [69.31200003384122]
  Conditional local independence is an independence relation among continuous time processes. No nonparametric test of conditional local independence has been available. We propose such a nonparametric test based on double machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T10:31:02Z)
• Counterfactual inference in sequential experiments [17.817769460838665]
  We consider after-study statistical inference for sequentially designed experiments wherein multiple units are assigned treatments for multiple time points.<n>Our goal is to provide inference guarantees for the counterfactual mean at the smallest possible scale.<n>We illustrate our theory via several simulations and a case study involving data from a mobile health clinical trial HeartSteps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T17:24:27Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Tracking disease outbreaks from sparse data with Bayesian inference [55.82986443159948]
  The COVID-19 pandemic provides new motivation for estimating the empirical rate of transmission during an outbreak. Standard methods struggle to accommodate the partial observability and sparse data common at finer scales. We propose a Bayesian framework which accommodates partial observability in a principled manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T20:37:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.