Smooth Sailing: Lipschitz-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Spatial Association

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06067v2
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 13:55:38 GMT
• Title: Smooth Sailing: Lipschitz-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Spatial Association
• Authors: David R. Burt, Renato Berlinghieri, Stephen Bates, Tamara Broderick,
• Abstract summary: Estimating associations is central to environmental science, epidemiology, and economics.<n>We introduce a method that constructs valid frequentist confidence intervals for associations in spatial settings.<n>Our approach is the first to guarantee nominal coverage in this setting and outperforms existing techniques in both real and simulated experiments.
• Score: 26.063765269659076
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Estimating associations between spatial covariates and responses - rather than merely predicting responses - is central to environmental science, epidemiology, and economics. For instance, public health officials might be interested in whether air pollution has a strictly positive association with a health outcome, and the magnitude of any effect. Standard machine learning methods often provide accurate predictions but offer limited insight into covariate-response relationships. And we show that existing methods for constructing confidence (or credible) intervals for associations fail to provide nominal coverage in the face of model misspecification and distribution shift - despite both being essentially always present in spatial problems. We introduce a method that constructs valid frequentist confidence intervals for associations in spatial settings. Our method requires minimal assumptions beyond a form of spatial smoothness. In particular, we do not require model correctness or covariate overlap between training and target locations. Our approach is the first to guarantee nominal coverage in this setting and outperforms existing techniques in both real and simulated experiments.

Related papers

• Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage [75.73184036344908]
  We present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework.<n>Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T19:54:14Z)
• Spatial Conformal Inference through Localized Quantile Regression [6.992239210938067]
  Conformal prediction offers valid prediction intervals without relying on parametric assumptions.<n>We propose Localized Spatial Conformal Prediction (L SCP), a conformal prediction method designed specifically for spatial data.<n>L SCP achieves accurate coverage with significantly tighter and more consistent prediction intervals compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T04:15:06Z)
• Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based Models [0.0]
  We show how diffusion-based models can be repurposed for performing principled, identifiable Bayesian inference.<n>We show how such maps can be learned via standard DBM training using a novel noise schedule.<n>The result is a class of highly expressive generative models, uniquely defined on a low-dimensional latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T19:58:19Z)
• Learning When the Concept Shifts: Confounding, Invariance, and Dimension Reduction [5.38274042816001]
  In observational data, the distribution shift is often driven by unobserved confounding factors. This motivates us to study the domain adaptation problem with observational data. We show a model that uses the learned lower-dimensional subspace can incur nearly ideal gap between target and source risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T17:43:08Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.<n>We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstention [70.83870602967625]
  We develop a principled procedure for determining when a large language model should abstain from responding in a general domain. We leverage conformal prediction techniques to develop an abstention procedure that benefits from rigorous theoretical guarantees on the hallucination rate (error rate) Experimentally, our resulting conformal abstention method reliably bounds the hallucination rate on various closed-book, open-domain generative question answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T11:32:03Z)
• SimPro: A Simple Probabilistic Framework Towards Realistic Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Learning [49.94607673097326]
  We propose a highly adaptable framework, designated as SimPro, which does not rely on any predefined assumptions about the distribution of unlabeled data. Our framework, grounded in a probabilistic model, innovatively refines the expectation-maximization algorithm. Our method showcases consistent state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks and data distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T03:39:04Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Communication-Efficient Distributed Estimation and Inference for Cox's Model [4.731404257629232]
  We develop communication-efficient iterative distributed algorithms for estimation and inference in the high-dimensional sparse Cox proportional hazards model. To construct confidence intervals for linear combinations of high-dimensional hazard regression coefficients, we introduce a novel debiased method. We provide valid and powerful distributed hypothesis tests for any coordinate element based on a decorrelated score test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T15:50:17Z)
• Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure [108.37226654006153]
  We formulate the problem of identifying and erasing a linear subspace that corresponds to a given concept. We show that the method is highly expressive, effectively mitigating bias in deep nonlinear classifiers while maintaining tractability and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T13:00:17Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Self-Supervised Hybrid Inference in State-Space Models [0.0]
  We perform approximate inference in state-space models that allow for nonlinear higher-order Markov chains in latent space. We do not rely on an additional parameterization of the generative model or supervision via uncorrupted observations or ground truth latent states. We obtain competitive results on the chaotic Lorenz system compared to a fully supervised approach and outperform a method based on variational inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T13:26:14Z)
• Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regression [60.08422051718195]
  Even simple methods like least squares can exhibit non-normal behavior when data is collected in an adaptive manner. We propose a family of online debiasing estimators to correct these distributional anomalies in at least squares estimation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our theory via applications to multi-armed bandit, autoregressive time series estimation, and active learning with exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T21:05:11Z)
• Accelerated Policy Evaluation: Learning Adversarial Environments with Adaptive Importance Sampling [19.81658135871748]
  A biased or inaccurate policy evaluation in a safety-critical system could potentially cause unexpected catastrophic failures. We propose the Accelerated Policy Evaluation (APE) method, which simultaneously uncovers rare events and estimates the rare event probability. APE is scalable to large discrete or continuous spaces by incorporating function approximators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-19T20:03:26Z)
• Locally Valid and Discriminative Confidence Intervals for Deep Learning Models [37.57296694423751]
  Uncertainty information should be valid (guaranteeing coverage) and discriminative (more uncertain when the expected risk is high) Most existing Bayesian methods lack frequentist coverage guarantees and usually affect model performance. We propose Locally Valid and Discriminative confidence intervals (LVD), a simple, efficient and lightweight method to construct discriminative confidence intervals (CIs) for almost any deep learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T04:39:56Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
  We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based. We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory. Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z)
• Learning Probabilistic Ordinal Embeddings for Uncertainty-Aware Regression [91.3373131262391]
  Uncertainty is the only certainty there is. Traditionally, the direct regression formulation is considered and the uncertainty is modeled by modifying the output space to a certain family of probabilistic distributions. How to model the uncertainty within the present-day technologies for regression remains an open issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-25T06:56:09Z)
• Scalable Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning [93.27920030279586]
  We introduce Approximate Variational Reward Imitation Learning (AVRIL) Our method addresses the ill-posed nature of the inverse reinforcement learning problem. Applying our method to real medical data alongside classic control simulations, we demonstrate Bayesian reward inference in environments beyond the scope of current methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:32:02Z)
• Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects [6.810856082577402]
  We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T01:03:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.