HF-RAG: Hierarchical Fusion-based RAG with Multiple Sources and Rankers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02837v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:03:40 GMT
• Title: HF-RAG: Hierarchical Fusion-based RAG with Multiple Sources and Rankers
• Abstract summary: Leveraging labeled and unlabeled data may provide complementary benefits in retrieval augmented generation.<n>We propose a method to combine evidence from these heterogeneous sources.<n>We evaluate our approach on the fact verification task, demonstrating that it consistently improves over the best-performing individual ranker or source.
• Score: 9.867003380698238
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Leveraging both labeled (input-output associations) and unlabeled data (wider contextual grounding) may provide complementary benefits in retrieval augmented generation (RAG). However, effectively combining evidence from these heterogeneous sources is challenging as the respective similarity scores are not inter-comparable. Additionally, aggregating beliefs from the outputs of multiple rankers can improve the effectiveness of RAG. Our proposed method first aggregates the top-documents from a number of IR models using a standard rank fusion technique for each source (labeled and unlabeled). Next, we standardize the retrieval score distributions within each source by applying z-score transformation before merging the top-retrieved documents from the two sources. We evaluate our approach on the fact verification task, demonstrating that it consistently improves over the best-performing individual ranker or source and also shows better out-of-domain generalization.

Related papers

• MultAttnAttrib: Training-Free Multimodal Attribution in Long Document Question Answering [73.47440561592556]
  We introduce MultAttnAttrib, a training-free attribution-generation method.<n>We show that MultAttnAttrib consistently outperforms a variety of attribution-generation methods.<n>Our method produces attributions at up to one-seventh of the direct inference latency compared to prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T19:29:19Z)
• Beyond the Reranker: Do RAG Retrieval Enhancements Help Once a Strong Reranker Is Present? [3.77661940418406]
  Methods for query expansion, hierarchical and cross-document summarization, graph-based expansion, per-query routing, rank fusion, and corrective re-retrieval are studied.<n>We show that a strong cross-encoder reranker accounts for most of the pipeline's quality.<n>The remaining reranking and pool-expansion methods in common use, among them hierarchical summarization, graph expansion, routing, and rank fusion, give no reliable gain once that reranker is present.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T20:50:41Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• GroupRank: A Groupwise Reranking Paradigm Driven by Reinforcement Learning [26.616849067985967]
  Groupwise is a novel reranking paradigm for large language models.<n>We propose an innovative pipeline for high quality retrieval and ranking data.<n>The resulting data can be leveraged not only for training the reranker but also for training the retriever.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T15:25:31Z)
• TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
  TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z)
• VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification [107.75781898355562]
  We introduce a novel framework, called VeriCite, designed to rigorously validate supporting evidence and enhance answer attribution.<n>We conduct experiments across five open-source LLMs and four datasets, demonstrating that VeriCite can significantly improve citation quality while maintaining the correctness of the answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T13:38:54Z)
• UniversalRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Corpora of Diverse Modalities and Granularities [53.76854299076118]
  UniversalRAG is a novel RAG framework designed to retrieve and integrate knowledge from heterogeneous sources with diverse modalities and granularities.<n>We propose a modality-aware routing mechanism that dynamically identifies the most appropriate modality-specific corpus and performs targeted retrieval within it.<n>We validate UniversalRAG on 8 benchmarks spanning multiple modalities, showing its superiority over various modality-specific and unified baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T13:18:58Z)
• Improving Generated and Retrieved Knowledge Combination Through Zero-shot Generation [41.43397783169612]
  Open-domain Question Answering (QA) has garnered substantial interest by combining faithfully retrieved passages and relevant passages generated through Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>There is a lack of definitive labels available to pair these sources of knowledge.<n>We propose Bi-Reranking for Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge (BRMGR), which utilizes re-ranking methods for both retrieved passages and LLM-generated passages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-25T06:40:36Z)
• Attention with Dependency Parsing Augmentation for Fine-Grained Attribution [26.603281615221505]
  We develop a fine-grained attribution mechanism that provides supporting evidence from retrieved documents for every answer span.<n>Existing attribution methods rely on model-internal similarity metrics between responses and documents, such as saliency scores and hidden state similarity.<n>We propose two techniques applicable to all model-internals-based methods. First, we aggregate token-wise evidence through set union operations, preserving the granularity of representations.<n>Second, we enhance the attributor by integrating dependency parsing to enrich the semantic completeness of target spans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T03:12:13Z)
• SiReRAG: Indexing Similar and Related Information for Multihop Reasoning [96.60045548116584]
  SiReRAG is a novel RAG indexing approach that explicitly considers both similar and related information.<n>SiReRAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art indexing methods on three multihop datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T04:56:43Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Estimation of Source Reliability [17.017833281143297]
  Reliability-Aware RAG (RA-RAG) estimates the reliability of multiple sources and incorporates this information into both retrieval and aggregation processes.<n>We introduce a benchmark designed to reflect real-world scenarios with heterogeneous source reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T12:09:29Z)
• Towards Fair RAG: On the Impact of Fair Ranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [53.285436927963865]
  This paper is the first systematic evaluation of RAG systems that integrate fairness-aware rankings.<n>We show that incorporating fairness-aware retrieval often maintains or even enhances both ranking quality and generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T23:10:04Z)
• DiffATR: Diffusion-based Generative Modeling for Audio-Text Retrieval [49.076590578101985]
  We present a diffusion-based ATR framework (DiffATR) that generates joint distribution from noise. Experiments on the AudioCaps and Clotho datasets with superior performances, verify the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:33:26Z)
• Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems. We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies. Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z)
• FeB4RAG: Evaluating Federated Search in the Context of Retrieval Augmented Generation [31.371489527686578]
  Federated search systems aggregate results from multiple search engines, selecting appropriate sources to enhance result quality and align with user intent. FEB4RAG is a novel dataset specifically designed for federated search within RAG frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T07:06:52Z)
• Semi-Supervised Domain Generalization with Stochastic StyleMatch [90.98288822165482]
  In real-world applications, we might have only a few labels available from each source domain due to high annotation cost. In this work, we investigate semi-supervised domain generalization, a more realistic and practical setting. Our proposed approach, StyleMatch, is inspired by FixMatch, a state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning method based on pseudo-labeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T16:00:08Z)
• Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answering [134.27768711201202]
  Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions. We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy. GAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on Natural Questions and TriviaQA datasets under the extractive QA setup when equipped with an extractive reader.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-17T23:08:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.