Multi Attribute Bias Mitigation via Representation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03616v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 18:08:59 GMT
• Title: Multi Attribute Bias Mitigation via Representation Learning
• Authors: Rajeev Ranjan Dwivedi, Ankur Kumar, Vinod K Kurmi,
• Abstract summary: Real world images frequently exhibit multiple overlapping biases, including textures, watermarks, gendered makeup, scene object pairings, etc.<n>We tackle this multi bias problem with Generalized Multi Bias Mitigation (GMBM), a lean two stage framework that needs group labels only while training and minimizes bias at test time.<n>We validate GMBM on FB CMNIST, CelebA, and COCO, where we boost worst group accuracy, halve multi attribute bias amplification, and set a new low in SBA.
• Score: 5.155573439009767
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Real world images frequently exhibit multiple overlapping biases, including textures, watermarks, gendered makeup, scene object pairings, etc. These biases collectively impair the performance of modern vision models, undermining both their robustness and fairness. Addressing these biases individually proves inadequate, as mitigating one bias often permits or intensifies others. We tackle this multi bias problem with Generalized Multi Bias Mitigation (GMBM), a lean two stage framework that needs group labels only while training and minimizes bias at test time. First, Adaptive Bias Integrated Learning (ABIL) deliberately identifies the influence of known shortcuts by training encoders for each attribute and integrating them with the main backbone, compelling the classifier to explicitly recognize these biases. Then Gradient Suppression Fine Tuning prunes those very bias directions from the backbone's gradients, leaving a single compact network that ignores all the shortcuts it just learned to recognize. Moreover we find that existing bias metrics break under subgroup imbalance and train test distribution shifts, so we introduce Scaled Bias Amplification (SBA): a test time measure that disentangles model induced bias amplification from distributional differences. We validate GMBM on FB CMNIST, CelebA, and COCO, where we boost worst group accuracy, halve multi attribute bias amplification, and set a new low in SBA even as bias complexity and distribution shifts intensify, making GMBM the first practical, end to end multibias solution for visual recognition. Project page: http://visdomlab.github.io/GMBM/

Related papers

• Adaptive Generation of Bias-Eliciting Questions for LLMs [18.608477560948003]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now widely deployed in user-facing applications, reaching hundreds of millions worldwide.<n>We introduce a counterfactual bias evaluation framework that automatically generates realistic, open-ended questions over sensitive attributes such as sex, race, or religion.<n>We also capture distinct response dimensions that are increasingly relevant in user interactions, such as asymmetric refusals and explicit acknowledgment of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T13:08:10Z)
• BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasing [2.7352017408152083]
  BLADE is a generative debiasing framework that requires no prior knowledge of bias or bias-conflicting samples.<n>We evaluate BLADE on multiple benchmark datasets and show that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T12:28:54Z)
• Debiasify: Self-Distillation for Unsupervised Bias Mitigation [19.813054813868476]
  Simplicity bias poses a significant challenge in neural networks, often leading models to favor simpler solutions and inadvertently learn decision rules influenced by spurious correlations. We introduce Debiasify, a novel self-distillation approach that requires no prior knowledge about the nature of biases. Our method leverages a new distillation loss to transfer knowledge within the network, from deeper layers containing complex, highly-predictive features to shallower layers with simpler, attribute-conditioned features in an unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T16:25:05Z)
• Mitigating Bias for Question Answering Models by Tracking Bias Influence [84.66462028537475]
  We propose BMBI, an approach to mitigate the bias of multiple-choice QA models. Based on the intuition that a model would lean to be more biased if it learns from a biased example, we measure the bias level of a query instance. We show that our method could be applied to multiple QA formulations across multiple bias categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T00:49:09Z)
• Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplification [2.492300648514129]
  Computer vision systems are not only reproducing but amplifying harmful social biases. We propose a new metric: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplification. We validate our proposed metric through an analysis of gender bias amplification on the COCO and imSitu datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T12:50:15Z)
• Self-supervised debiasing using low rank regularization [59.84695042540525]
  Spurious correlations can cause strong biases in deep neural networks, impairing generalization ability. We propose a self-supervised debiasing framework potentially compatible with unlabeled samples. Remarkably, the proposed debiasing framework significantly improves the generalization performance of self-supervised learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T08:26:19Z)
• Relieving Long-tailed Instance Segmentation via Pairwise Class Balance [85.53585498649252]
  Long-tailed instance segmentation is a challenging task due to the extreme imbalance of training samples among classes. It causes severe biases of the head classes (with majority samples) against the tailed ones. We propose a novel Pairwise Class Balance (PCB) method, built upon a confusion matrix which is updated during training to accumulate the ongoing prediction preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T07:48:36Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Learning Debiased Models with Dynamic Gradient Alignment and Bias-conflicting Sample Mining [39.00256193731365]
  Deep neural networks notoriously suffer from dataset biases which are detrimental to model robustness, generalization and fairness. We propose a two-stage debiasing scheme to combat against the intractable unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T14:50:10Z)
• Fairness-aware Class Imbalanced Learning [57.45784950421179]
  We evaluate long-tail learning methods for tweet sentiment and occupation classification. We extend a margin-loss based approach with methods to enforce fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T22:16:30Z)
• BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentation [20.149645246997668]
  Deep neural networks often make decisions based on the spurious correlations inherent in the dataset, failing to generalize in an unbiased data distribution. This paper proposes a novel bias-tailored augmentation-based approach, BiaSwap, for learning debiased representation without requiring supervision on the bias type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-23T08:35:26Z)
• Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD Generalization [93.8373619657239]
  Neural networks trained with SGD were recently shown to rely preferentially on linearly-predictive features. This simplicity bias can explain their lack of robustness out of distribution (OOD) We demonstrate that the simplicity bias can be mitigated and OOD generalization improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T12:12:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.