Scaling behavior of large language models in emotional safety classification across sizes and tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04512v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 20:53:03 GMT
• Title: Scaling behavior of large language models in emotional safety classification across sizes and tasks
• Authors: Edoardo Pinzuti, Oliver Tüscher, André Ferreira Castro,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the scaling behavior of large language models (LLMs) on two key tasks: trinary classification of emotional safety and multi-label classification.<n>We construct a novel dataset by merging several human-authored mental health datasets.<n>We evaluate four LLaMA models (1B, 3B, 8B, 70B) across zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding how large language models (LLMs) process emotionally sensitive content is critical for building safe and reliable systems, particularly in mental health contexts. We investigate the scaling behavior of LLMs on two key tasks: trinary classification of emotional safety (safe vs. unsafe vs. borderline) and multi-label classification using a six-category safety risk taxonomy. To support this, we construct a novel dataset by merging several human-authored mental health datasets (> 15K samples) and augmenting them with emotion re-interpretation prompts generated via ChatGPT. We evaluate four LLaMA models (1B, 3B, 8B, 70B) across zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings. Our results show that larger LLMs achieve stronger average performance, particularly in nuanced multi-label classification and in zero-shot settings. However, lightweight fine-tuning allowed the 1B model to achieve performance comparable to larger models and BERT in several high-data categories, while requiring <2GB VRAM at inference. These findings suggest that smaller, on-device models can serve as viable, privacy-preserving alternatives for sensitive applications, offering the ability to interpret emotional context and maintain safe conversational boundaries. This work highlights key implications for therapeutic LLM applications and the scalable alignment of safety-critical systems.

Related papers

• OutSafe-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Offensive Content Detection in Large Language Models [54.80460603255789]
  We introduce OutSafe-Bench, the first most comprehensive content safety evaluation test suite designed for the multimodal era.<n>OutSafe-Bench includes a large-scale dataset that spans four modalities, featuring over 18,000 bilingual (Chinese and English) text prompts, 4,500 images, 450 audio clips and 450 videos, all systematically annotated across nine critical content risk categories.<n>In addition to the dataset, we introduce a Multidimensional Cross Risk Score (MCRS), a novel metric designed to model and assess overlapping and correlated content risks across different categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T13:18:27Z)
• Reimagining Safety Alignment with An Image [49.33281424100804]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel in diverse applications but face dual challenges: generating harmful content under jailbreak attacks and over-refusal of benign queries.<n>We propose Magic Image, an optimization-driven visual prompt framework that enhances security while reducing over-refusal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T11:27:07Z)
• When Safe Unimodal Inputs Collide: Optimizing Reasoning Chains for Cross-Modal Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models [50.66979825532277]
  We introduce Safe-Semantics-but-Unsafe-Interpretation (SSUI), the first dataset featuring interpretable reasoning paths tailored for a cross-modal challenge.<n>A novel training framework, Safety-aware Reasoning Path Optimization (SRPO), is also designed based on the SSUI dataset.<n> Experimental results show that our SRPO-trained models achieve state-of-the-art results on key safety benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T15:40:58Z)
• The Problem with Safety Classification is not just the Models [3.2634122554914002]
  We show how multilingual disparities exist in 5 safety classification models by considering datasets covering 18 languages.<n>We identify potential issues with the evaluation datasets, arguing that the shortcomings of current safety classifiers are not only because of the models themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T13:09:40Z)
• Do We Really Need Curated Malicious Data for Safety Alignment in Multi-modal Large Language Models? [83.53005932513155]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress, yet their safety alignment remains limited.<n>We propose finetuning MLLMs on a small set of benign instruct-following data with responses replaced by simple, clear rejection sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T09:03:51Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal [64.9938658716425]
  SORRY-Bench is a proposed benchmark for evaluating large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests.<n>First, existing methods often use coarse-grained taxonomy of unsafe topics, and are over-representing some fine-grained topics.<n>Second, linguistic characteristics and formatting of prompts are often overlooked, like different languages, dialects, and more -- which are only implicitly considered in many evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:56:07Z)
• AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Experts [0.0]
  As Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI become more widespread, the content safety risks associated with their use also increase. We find a notable deficiency in high-quality content safety datasets and benchmarks that comprehensively cover a wide range of critical safety areas. To address this, we define a broad content safety risk taxonomy, comprising 13 critical risk and 9 sparse risk categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T03:54:28Z)
• Developing Safe and Responsible Large Language Model : Can We Balance Bias Reduction and Language Understanding in Large Language Models? [2.089112028396727]
  This study explores whether Large Language Models can produce safe, unbiased outputs without sacrificing knowledge or comprehension.<n>We introduce the Safe and Responsible Large Language Model (textbfSR$_textLLM$)<n>Experiments on our specialized dataset and out-of-distribution test sets reveal that textbfSR$_textLLM$ effectively reduces biases while preserving knowledge integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T18:10:05Z)
• RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
  Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.