Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07253v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 22:11:10 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks
• Authors: Julian Killingback, Hamed Zamani,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are incredible and versatile tools for text-based tasks.<n>Retrieval models, in contrast, have not yet seen such capable general-purpose models emerge.
• Score: 32.18858311247196
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are incredible and versatile tools for text-based tasks that have enabled countless, previously unimaginable, applications. Retrieval models, in contrast, have not yet seen such capable general-purpose models emerge. To achieve this goal, retrieval models must be able to perform complex retrieval tasks, where queries contain multiple parts, constraints, or requirements in natural language. These tasks represent a natural progression from the simple, single-aspect queries that are used in the vast majority of existing, commonly used evaluation sets. Complex queries naturally arise as people expect search systems to handle more specific and often ambitious information requests, as is demonstrated by how people use LLM-based information systems. Despite the growing desire for retrieval models to expand their capabilities in complex retrieval tasks, there exist limited resources to assess the ability of retrieval models on a comprehensive set of diverse complex tasks. The few resources that do exist feature a limited scope and often lack realistic settings making it hard to know the true capabilities of retrieval models on complex real-world retrieval tasks. To address this shortcoming and spur innovation in next-generation retrieval models, we construct a diverse and realistic set of complex retrieval tasks and benchmark a representative set of state-of-the-art retrieval models. Additionally, we explore the impact of LLM-based query expansion and rewriting on retrieval quality. Our results show that even the best models struggle to produce high-quality retrieval results with the highest average nDCG@10 of only 0.346 and R@100 of only 0.587 across all tasks. Although LLM augmentation can help weaker models, the strongest model has decreased performance across all metrics with all rewriting techniques.

Related papers

• DynaSearcher: Dynamic Knowledge Graph Augmented Search Agent via Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning [5.280613615397194]
  DynaSearcher is an innovative search agent enhanced by dynamic knowledge graphs and multi-reward reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We employ a multi-reward RL framework for fine-grained control over training objectives such as retrieval accuracy, efficiency, and response quality.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art answer accuracy on six multi-hop question answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T09:58:31Z)
• MMSearch-R1: Incentivizing LMMs to Search [49.889749277236376]
  We present MMSearch-R1, the first end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables on-demand, multi-turn search in real-world Internet environments.<n>Our framework integrates both image and text search tools, allowing the model to reason about when and how to invoke them guided by an outcome-based reward with a search penalty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T17:59:42Z)
• Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques [14.892995952768352]
  Language Models (LMs) have excelled at tasks like text generation, summarization, and question answering.<n>Their inference remains computationally expensive and energy intensive in settings with limited hardware, power, or bandwidth.<n>Recent approaches have introduced multi LLM intelligent model selection strategies that dynamically allocate computational resources based on query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T23:13:08Z)
• ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching [69.55482019211597]
  We introduce ZeroSearch, a framework that incentivizes the capabilities of large language models to use a real search engine with simulated searches during training.<n>Our approach begins with lightweight supervised fine-tuning to transform the LLM into a retrieval module capable of generating both useful and noisy documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T17:30:22Z)
• MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [38.864056667809095]
  MultiConIR is a benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval and reranking models under nuanced multi-condition query scenarios.<n>Most retrievers and rerankers exhibit severe performance degradation as query complexity increases.<n>This work delves into the factors contributing to reranker performance deterioration and examines how condition positioning within queries affects similarity assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z)
• MM-Embed: Universal Multimodal Retrieval with Multimodal LLMs [78.5013630951288]
  This paper introduces techniques for advancing information retrieval with multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>We first study fine-tuning an MLLM as a bi-encoder retriever on 10 datasets with 16 retrieval tasks.<n>Our model, MM-Embed, achieves state-of-the-art performance on the multimodal retrieval benchmark M-BEIR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T20:06:34Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity [59.57065228857247]
  Retrieval-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to enhancing response accuracy in several tasks, such as Question-Answering (QA) We propose a novel adaptive QA framework, that can dynamically select the most suitable strategy for (retrieval-augmented) LLMs based on the query complexity. We validate our model on a set of open-domain QA datasets, covering multiple query complexities, and show that ours enhances the overall efficiency and accuracy of QA systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:52:30Z)
• BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives [2.3420045370973828]
  We present the Benchmark of Information Retrieval (IR) tasks with Complex Objectives (BIRCO) BIRCO evaluates the ability of IR systems to retrieve documents given multi-faceted user objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T22:22:30Z)
• Large Search Model: Redefining Search Stack in the Era of LLMs [63.503320030117145]
  We introduce a novel conceptual framework called large search model, which redefines the conventional search stack by unifying search tasks with one large language model (LLM) All tasks are formulated as autoregressive text generation problems, allowing for the customization of tasks through the use of natural language prompts. This proposed framework capitalizes on the strong language understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs, offering the potential to enhance search result quality while simultaneously simplifying the existing cumbersome search stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T05:52:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.