Optimality of universal conclusive entanglement purification protocols
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09423v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:04:17 GMT
- Title: Optimality of universal conclusive entanglement purification protocols
- Authors: Alexandre C. Orthey, Aby Philip, Tulja Varun Kondra, Alexander Streltsov,
- Abstract summary: We establish fundamental limits for conclusive protocols distilling perfect Bell states from a pure two-qubit states.<n>We prove that a known protocol achieves these bounds, confirming its optimality.
- Score: 75.52645767671567
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Entanglement purification is essential for quantum technologies; yet, rigorous bounds on the success probability for universal protocols -- those requiring no prior knowledge about the input state -- have remained underexplored. We establish such fundamental limits for conclusive protocols distilling perfect Bell states from a pure two-qubit states by deriving the optimal success probability starting with: two copies of a state with known Schmidt basis, and four copies of a state with unknown Schmidt basis. We prove that a known protocol achieves these bounds, confirming its optimality. Crucially, universality imposes an inherent efficiency trade-off, yielding an average success probability of just $2/105$ over Haar measure.
Related papers
- Why quantum state verification cannot be both efficient and secure: a categorical approach [0.0]
We show a fundamental limit for quantum state verification for all cut-and-choose approaches used to verify arbitrary quantum states.
Our findings show that the prevailing cut-and-choose techniques cannot lead to quantum state verification protocols that are both efficient and secure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T15:07:29Z) - Storage and retrieval of two unknown unitary channels [37.928612512813494]
We consider the case where the unknown unitary is selected with equal prior probability from two options.
First, we prove that the optimal storage strategy involves the sequential application of the $n$ uses of the unknown unitary.
Next, we show that incoherent "measure-and-prepare" retrieval achieves the maximum fidelity between the retrieved operation and the original (qubit) unitary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T18:27:46Z) - Protocols and Trade-Offs of Quantum State Purification [4.732131350249]
We introduce a general state purification framework designed to achieve the highest fidelity with a specified probability.
For i.i.d. quantum states under depolarizing noise, our framework can replicate the purification protocol proposed by Barenco and al.
We prove the protocols' optimality for two copies of noisy states with any dimension and confirm its optimality for higher numbers of copies and dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T14:34:45Z) - Performance of entanglement purification including maximally entangled mixed states [0.0]
Entanglement between distant quantum systems is a critical resource for implementing quantum communication.
We propose an entanglement purification protocol based on two entangling two-qubit operations.
Two variants of the core protocol are introduced and shown to be more practical in certain scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T18:34:34Z) - Robust and efficient verification of graph states in blind
measurement-based quantum computation [52.70359447203418]
Blind quantum computation (BQC) is a secure quantum computation method that protects the privacy of clients.
It is crucial to verify whether the resource graph states are accurately prepared in the adversarial scenario.
Here, we propose a robust and efficient protocol for verifying arbitrary graph states with any prime local dimension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T06:24:45Z) - Probabilistic pure state conversion on the majorization lattice [0.0]
Entanglement is among the most fundamental-and at the same time puzzling-properties of quantum physics.
We show that the majorization lattice provides an efficient framework in order to characterize the allowed transformations of pure entangled states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T16:10:50Z) - Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four
quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements.
Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z) - Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation [77.34726150561087]
We develop new and efficient quantum algorithms for fidelity estimation with provable performance guarantees.
Our algorithms use advanced quantum linear algebra techniques, such as the quantum singular value transformation.
We prove that fidelity estimation to any non-trivial constant additive accuracy is hard in general.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T02:02:16Z) - Gaussian conversion protocols for cubic phase state generation [104.23865519192793]
Universal quantum computing with continuous variables requires non-Gaussian resources.
The cubic phase state is a non-Gaussian state whose experimental implementation has so far remained elusive.
We introduce two protocols that allow for the conversion of a non-Gaussian state to a cubic phase state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T09:19:49Z) - Universally Optimal Verification of Entangled States with Nondemolition
Measurements [3.014547324345968]
We present a universally optimal protocol for verifying entangled states by employing the so-called quantum nondemolition measurements.
We demonstrate the power of our protocol for the optimal verification of Bell states, arbitrary two-qubit pure states, and stabilizer states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T14:48:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.