A Research Vision for Web Search on Emerging Topics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10212v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:00:06 GMT
• Title: A Research Vision for Web Search on Emerging Topics
• Abstract summary: Information on emerging topics is sparse and evolves dynamically as knowledge grows, making it uncertain and variable in quality and trustworthiness.<n>We propose three overarching research questions, aimed at understanding the status quo, determining requirements of systems aligned with our vision, and building these systems.
• Score: 8.36383751679941
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We regularly encounter information on novel, emerging topics for which the body of knowledge is still evolving, which can be linked, for instance, to current events. A primary way to learn more about such topics is through web search. However, information on emerging topics is sparse and evolves dynamically as knowledge grows, making it uncertain and variable in quality and trustworthiness and prone to deliberate or accidental manipulation, misinformation, and bias. In this paper, we outline a research vision towards search systems and interfaces that support effective knowledge acquisition, awareness of the dynamic nature of topics, and responsible opinion formation among people searching the web for information on emerging topics. To realize this vision, we propose three overarching research questions, aimed at understanding the status quo, determining requirements of systems aligned with our vision, and building these systems. For each of the three questions, we highlight relevant literature, including pointers on how they could be addressed. Lastly, we discuss the challenges that will potentially arise in pursuing the proposed vision.

Related papers

• The Knowledge Gap in a High-Choice Media Environment: Experimental Evidence from Online Search [1.1666234644810893]
  We study how individuals with varying education levels acquire policy-specific knowledge through online search.<n>We estimate both intention-to-treat (ITT) and local average treatment effects (LATE) of information seeking on post-search knowledge outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T10:52:32Z)
• Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figures [63.41049609329304]
  We generate inquisitive questions that reach the depth of questions humans generate when engaging with scientific papers.<n>We extend the linguistic theory of Questions Under Discussion (QUD) from being text-only to multimodal.<n>We show that fine-tuning a VLM on MQUD shifts the model from generating generic low-level visual questions to content-specific grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T14:25:23Z)
• Enhancing the Learning Experience: Using Vision-Language Models to Generate Questions for Educational Videos [6.689443785478135]
  We investigate the capabilities of vision-language models for generating learning-oriented questions for educational videos.<n>Our findings delineate the capabilities of current vision-language models, highlighting the need for fine-tuning and addressing challenges in question diversity and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T11:37:31Z)
• From Superficial to Deep: Integrating External Knowledge for Follow-up Question Generation Using Knowledge Graph and LLM [19.826039292102728]
  In a conversational system, dynamically generating follow-up questions based on context can help users explore information.<n>We propose a three-stage external knowledge-enhanced follow-up question generation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T08:31:03Z)
• Advancing Explainable Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Comprehensive Review and Research Roadmap [4.2330023661329355]
  This study presents a review to discuss the complexities associated with explanation generation and presentation. Our roadmap is underpinned by principles of responsible research and innovation. By exploring these research directions, the study aims to guide the development and deployment of explainable AVs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T11:43:41Z)
• Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challenges [51.23244504291712]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken Knowledge Representation -- and the world -- by storm. This inflection point marks a shift from explicit knowledge representation to a renewed focus on the hybrid representation of both explicit knowledge and parametric knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T20:16:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Forgetting in Deep Learning Beyond Continual Learning [58.107474025048866]
  Forgetting refers to the loss or deterioration of previously acquired knowledge. Forgetting is a prevalent phenomenon observed in various other research domains within deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T16:27:58Z)
• Machine Unlearning: A Survey [56.79152190680552]
  A special need has arisen where, due to privacy, usability, and/or the right to be forgotten, information about some specific samples needs to be removed from a model, called machine unlearning. This emerging technology has drawn significant interest from both academics and industry due to its innovation and practicality. No study has analyzed this complex topic or compared the feasibility of existing unlearning solutions in different kinds of scenarios. The survey concludes by highlighting some of the outstanding issues with unlearning techniques, along with some feasible directions for new research opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T10:18:36Z)
• Can Pre-trained Vision and Language Models Answer Visual Information-Seeking Questions? [50.29862466940209]
  We introduce InfoSeek, a visual question answering dataset tailored for information-seeking questions. We analyze various pre-trained visual question answering models and gain insights into their characteristics. We show that accurate visual entity recognition can be used to improve performance on InfoSeek by retrieving relevant documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T00:33:54Z)
• What should I Ask: A Knowledge-driven Approach for Follow-up Questions Generation in Conversational Surveys [63.51903260461746]
  We propose a novel task for knowledge-driven follow-up question generation in conversational surveys. We constructed a new human-annotated dataset of human-written follow-up questions with dialogue history and labeled knowledge. We then propose a two-staged knowledge-driven model for the task, which generates informative and coherent follow-up questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T00:57:33Z)
• Stay Hungry, Stay Focused: Generating Informative and Specific Questions in Information-Seeking Conversations [41.74162467619795]
  We investigate the problem of generating informative questions in information-asymmetric conversations. To generate pragmatic questions, we use reinforcement learning to optimize an informativeness metric. We demonstrate that the resulting pragmatic questioner substantially improves the informativeness and specificity of questions generated over a baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T00:49:14Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications [89.78089494738002]
  We review research topics about 1) knowledge graph representation learning, 2) knowledge acquisition and completion, 3) temporal knowledge graph, and 4) knowledge-aware applications. For knowledge acquisition, especially knowledge graph completion, embedding methods, path inference, and logical rule reasoning, are reviewed. We explore several emerging topics, including meta learning, commonsense reasoning, and temporal knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-02T13:17:31Z)
• Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements [55.33496599723126]
  disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth. Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.