Towards a European Quantum Act: A Two-Pillar Framework for Regulation and Innovation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14262v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 16:25:25 GMT
• Title: Towards a European Quantum Act: A Two-Pillar Framework for Regulation and Innovation
• Authors: Mauritz Kop,
• Abstract summary: Quantum technologies promise transformative advancements but pose significant dual-use risks.<n> Realizing their potential while mitigating risks requires a robust, anticipatory, and harmonized EU regulatory framework.<n>We propose the EU Quantum Act should be a two-pillar instrument, combining New Legislative Framework-style regulation with an ambitious Chips Act-style industrial and security policy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum technologies promise transformative advancements but pose significant dual-use risks. Realizing their potential while mitigating risks necessitates a robust, anticipatory, and harmonized EU regulatory framework, grounded in the precautionary principle. Such a framework must be sui generis, as foundational quantum mechanical phenomena -incl. superposition, entanglement, and tunneling -defy the intuitive classical assumptions of factual certainty, causality, and locality that underpin existing legal paradigms, demanding a bespoke regulatory architecture that contributes to the emerging lex specialis for quantum information technologies. Responding to the Quantum Europe Strategy, this contribution outlines the rationale for a dedicated European Quantum Act. Drawing lessons from legislative strategies in the semiconductor (EU/US Chips Acts) and AI (EU AI Act) domains, and analyzing US and Chinese technology policy, we argue the EU needs a 'full-stack' industrial policy. We propose the EU Quantum Act should be a two-pillar instrument, combining New Legislative Framework-style regulation with an ambitious Chips Act-style industrial and security policy. This dual approach fosters innovation through strategic investment (e.g. via a DARPA-style agency) while managing risk through clear, risk-based tiers and regulatory sandboxes. This strategy is presented as essential for EU technological sovereignty and for building a strong transatlantic tech alliance. On the international stage, we advocate for a global non-proliferation framework for quantum and AI wmd's inspired by the IAEA/NPT model and overseen by an 'International Quantum Agency'. This vision culminates in the 'Qubits for Peace' initiative, a global governance structure to ensure quantum technologies are developed safely and ethically. The article concludes by consolidating the analysis into a detailed legislative blueprint.

Related papers

• The Nexus of Quantum Technology, Intellectual Property, and National Security: An LSI Test for Securing the Quantum Industrial Commons [0.0]
  Quantum technologies have moved from laboratory curiosities to strategic infrastructure.<n>China's quantum program is centrally mobilized under military-civil fusion.<n>U.S. and allies should pursue security-sufficient openness, operationalized through a least-trade-restrictive, security-sufficient, innovation-preserving (LSI) test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T04:21:56Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance [46.71493672772134]
  We argue that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight.<n>We propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T18:10:04Z)
• Towards an Atomic Agency for Quantum-AI [0.0]
  This essay analyzes emerging AI & quantum technology (incl. quantum-AI hybrids) regulation, export controls, and standards in the US, EU, & China.<n>It posits risks from a US 'Washington effect' (premature regulation under uncertainty) and a Chinese 'Beijing effect' (exporting autocratic norms via standards/Digital Silk Road)<n>It explores pathways toward a harmonized Quantum Acquis Planetaire, anchored in universal values ('what connects us') via foundational standards and agile legal guardrails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T14:17:43Z)
• Mapping the Regulatory Learning Space for the EU AI Act [0.8987776881291145]
  The EU AI Act represents the world's first transnational AI regulation with concrete enforcement measures.<n>It builds on existing EU mechanisms for regulating health and safety of products but extends them to protect fundamental rights.<n>We argue that this will lead to multiple uncertainties in the enforcement of the AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T12:46:30Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act [40.233017376716305]
  The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a significant step towards responsible AI development.<n>It lacks clear technical interpretation, making it difficult to assess models' compliance.<n>This work presents COMPL-AI, a comprehensive framework consisting of the first technical interpretation of the Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T14:23:51Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• AI Regulation in Europe: From the AI Act to Future Regulatory Challenges [3.0821115746307663]
  It argues for a hybrid regulatory strategy that combines elements from both philosophies. The paper examines the AI Act as a pioneering legislative effort to address the multifaceted challenges posed by AI. It advocates for immediate action to create protocols for regulated access to high-performance, potentially open-source AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T07:52:56Z)
• Towards responsible quantum technology, safeguarding, engaging and advancing Quantum R&D [0.0]
  The expected societal impact of quantum technologies (QT) urges us to proceed and innovate responsibly. This article proposes a conceptual framework for Responsible QT that seeks to integrate considerations about ethical, legal, social, and policy implications into quantum R&D.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T13:24:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.