Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16330v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:13:32 GMT
- Title: Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
- Authors: Minxing Zhang, Yi Yang, Roy Xie, Bhuwan Dhingra, Shuyan Zhou, Jian Pei,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in diverse domains like web navigation and household robotics.<n>Despite growing interest, the concept of generalizability in LLM-based agents remains underdefined.<n>This survey aims to establish a foundation for principled research on building LLM-based agents that generalize reliably across diverse applications.
- Score: 32.40919143404769
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have emerged as a new paradigm that extends LLMs' capabilities beyond text generation to dynamic interaction with external environments. By integrating reasoning with perception, memory, and tool use, agents are increasingly deployed in diverse domains like web navigation and household robotics. A critical challenge, however, lies in ensuring agent generalizability - the ability to maintain consistent performance across varied instructions, tasks, environments, and domains, especially those beyond agents' fine-tuning data. Despite growing interest, the concept of generalizability in LLM-based agents remains underdefined, and systematic approaches to measure and improve it are lacking. In this survey, we provide the first comprehensive review of generalizability in LLM-based agents. We begin by emphasizing agent generalizability's importance by appealing to stakeholders and clarifying the boundaries of agent generalizability by situating it within a hierarchical domain-task ontology. We then review datasets, evaluation dimensions, and metrics, highlighting their limitations. Next, we categorize methods for improving generalizability into three groups: methods for the backbone LLM, for agent components, and for their interactions. Moreover, we introduce the distinction between generalizable frameworks and generalizable agents and outline how generalizable frameworks can be translated into agent-level generalizability. Finally, we identify critical challenges and future directions, including developing standardized frameworks, variance- and cost-based metrics, and approaches that integrate methodological innovations with architecture-level designs. By synthesizing progress and highlighting opportunities, this survey aims to establish a foundation for principled research on building LLM-based agents that generalize reliably across diverse applications.
Related papers
- Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z) - A Survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models [84.18778056010629]
We present a comprehensive survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models (Agentic MLLMs)<n>We explore the emerging paradigm of agentic MLLMs, delineating their conceptual foundations and distinguishing characteristics from conventional MLLM-based agents.<n>To further accelerate research in this area for the community, we compile open-source training frameworks, training and evaluation datasets for developing agentic MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T04:07:01Z) - The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [104.31926740841128]
The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z) - Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z) - A Survey on Trustworthy LLM Agents: Threats and Countermeasures [67.23228612512848]
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-agent Systems (MAS) have significantly expanded the capabilities of LLM ecosystems.<n>We propose the TrustAgent framework, a comprehensive study on the trustworthiness of agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T08:42:05Z) - A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms: Fine-tuning, which enhances task-specific accuracy; Alignment, which ensures ethical coherence and alignment with human preferences; Reasoning, which advances multi-step inference despite challenges in reward design; Integration and Adaptation, which
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z) - LLM-Agent-UMF: LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework for Seamless Integration of Multi Active/Passive Core-Agents [0.0]
We propose a novel LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework (LLM-Agent-UMF)
Our framework distinguishes between the different components of an LLM-based agent, setting LLMs and tools apart from a new element, the core-agent.
We evaluate our framework by applying it to thirteen state-of-the-art agents, thereby demonstrating its alignment with their functionalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T17:54:17Z) - AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents [74.16170899755281]
We introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents.<n>AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit.<n>This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T01:51:00Z) - Exploring Large Language Model based Intelligent Agents: Definitions,
Methods, and Prospects [32.91556128291915]
This paper surveys current research to provide an in-depth overview of intelligent agents within single and multi-agent systems.
It covers their definitions, research frameworks, and foundational components such as their composition, cognitive and planning methods, tool utilization, and responses to environmental feedback.
We conclude by envisioning prospects for LLM-based agents, considering the evolving landscape of AI and natural language processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T09:08:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.