Multi-Hierarchical Feature Detection for Large Language Model Generated Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18862v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:55:42 GMT
• Title: Multi-Hierarchical Feature Detection for Large Language Model Generated Text
• Authors: Luyan Zhang, Xinyu Xie,
• Abstract summary: Multi-hierarchical feature integration for AI text detection is investigated.<n>We implement MHFD (Multi-Hierarchical Feature Detection), integrating semantic analysis, syntactic parsing, and statistical probability features through adaptive fusion.<n> Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the MHFD method achieves 89.7% accuracy in in-domain detection and maintains 84.2% stable performance in cross-domain detection, showing modest improvements of 0.4-2.6% over existing methods.
• Score: 2.5782420501870287
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language model technology, there is growing interest in whether multi-feature approaches can significantly improve AI text detection beyond what single neural models achieve. While intuition suggests that combining semantic, syntactic, and statistical features should provide complementary signals, this assumption has not been rigorously tested with modern LLM-generated text. This paper provides a systematic empirical investigation of multi-hierarchical feature integration for AI text detection, specifically testing whether the computational overhead of combining multiple feature types is justified by performance gains. We implement MHFD (Multi-Hierarchical Feature Detection), integrating DeBERTa-based semantic analysis, syntactic parsing, and statistical probability features through adaptive fusion. Our investigation reveals important negative results: despite theoretical expectations, multi-feature integration provides minimal benefits (0.4-0.5% improvement) while incurring substantial computational costs (4.2x overhead), suggesting that modern neural language models may already capture most relevant detection signals efficiently. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the MHFD method achieves 89.7% accuracy in in-domain detection and maintains 84.2% stable performance in cross-domain detection, showing modest improvements of 0.4-2.6% over existing methods.

Related papers

• AI Generated Text Detection [0.0]
  This paper presents an evaluation of AI text detection methods, including both traditional machine learning models and transformer-based architectures.<n>We utilize two datasets, HC3 and DAIGT v2, to build a unified benchmark and apply a topic-based data split to prevent information leakage.<n>Results indicate that contextual modeling is significantly superior to lexical features and highlight the importance of mitigating topic memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T11:18:10Z)
• Semantic-Guided Natural Language and Visual Fusion for Cross-Modal Interaction Based on Tiny Object Detection [6.895355763564631]
  This paper introduces a cutting-edge approach to cross-modal interaction for tiny object detection by combining semantic-guided natural language processing with advanced visual recognition backbones.<n>The proposed method integrates the BERT language model with the CNN-based Parallel Residual Bi-Fusion Feature Pyramid Network.<n>By employing lemmatization and fine-tuning techniques, the system aligns semantic cues from textual inputs with visual features, enhancing detection precision for small and complex objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T18:38:00Z)
• Human Texts Are Outliers: Detecting LLM-generated Texts via Out-of-distribution Detection [71.59834293521074]
  We develop a framework to distinguish between human-authored and machine-generated text.<n>Our method achieves 98.3% AUROC and AUPR with only 8.9% FPR95 on DeepFake dataset.<n>Code, pretrained weights, and demo will be released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T08:14:45Z)
• AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guarantees [12.122798309971316]
  We study the problem of determining whether a piece of text has been authored by a human or by a large language model (LLM)<n>Existing state of the art logits-based detectors make use of statistics derived from the log-probability of the observed text evaluated using the distribution function of a given source LLM.<n>We introduce AdaDetectGPT -- a novel classifier that adaptively learns a witness function from training data to enhance the performance of logits-based detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T10:04:35Z)
• DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Models [60.713908578319256]
  We propose Direct Discrepancy Learning (DDL) to optimize the detector with task-oriented knowledge.<n>Built upon this, we introduce DetectAnyLLM, a unified detection framework that achieves state-of-the-art MGTD performance.<n>MIRAGE samples human-written texts from 10 corpora across 5 text-domains, which are then re-generated or revised using 17 cutting-edge LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T10:59:57Z)
• RepreGuard: Detecting LLM-Generated Text by Revealing Hidden Representation Patterns [50.401907401444404]
  Large language models (LLMs) are crucial for preventing misuse and building trustworthy AI systems.<n>We propose RepreGuard, an efficient statistics-based detection method.<n> Experimental results show that RepreGuard outperforms all baselines with average 94.92% AUROC on both in-distribution (ID) and OOD scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T17:59:15Z)
• Text-ADBench: Text Anomaly Detection Benchmark based on LLMs Embedding [27.02879006439693]
  This work performs a comprehensive empirical study and introduces a benchmark for text anomaly detection.<n>Our work systematically evaluates the effectiveness of embedding-based text anomaly detection.<n>By open-sourcing our benchmark toolkit, this work provides a foundation for future research in robust and scalable text anomaly detection systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T14:47:41Z)
• Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling [58.69141724095398]
  We introduce STAND (STochastic Adaptive N-gram Drafting), a novel model-free speculative decoding approach.<n>We show that STAND reduces inference latency by 60-65% compared to standard autoregressive decoding.<n>As a model-free approach, STAND can be applied to any existing language model without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:31:18Z)
• Advancing Tabular Stroke Modelling Through a Novel Hybrid Architecture and Feature-Selection Synergy [0.9999629695552196]
  The present work develops and validates a data-driven and interpretable machine-learning framework designed to predict strokes.<n>Ten routinely gathered demographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables were sourced from a public cohort of 4,981 records.<n>The proposed model achieved an accuracy rate of 97.2% and an F1-score of 97.15%, indicating a significant enhancement compared to the leading individual model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T21:46:45Z)
• Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequences [18.955509967889782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating high-quality texts across diverse domains. Training-free methods, which focus on inherent discrepancies through carefully designed statistical features, offer improved generalization and interpretability. We introduce a novel training-free detector, termed textbfLastde that synergizes local and global statistics for enhanced detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T14:23:45Z)
• Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Method [108.56493934296687]
  We introduce a divergence-based calibration method, inspired by the divergence-from-randomness concept, to calibrate token probabilities for pretraining data detection.<n>We have developed a Chinese-language benchmark, PatentMIA, to assess the performance of detection approaches for LLMs on Chinese text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T07:55:35Z)
• Advancing Automated Deception Detection: A Multimodal Approach to Feature Extraction and Analysis [0.0]
  This research focuses on the extraction and combination of various features to enhance the accuracy of deception detection models. By systematically extracting features from visual, audio, and text data, and experimenting with different combinations, we developed a robust model that achieved an impressive 99% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T14:59:10Z)
• Adaptive Ensembles of Fine-Tuned Transformers for LLM-Generated Text Detection [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have reached human-like proficiency in generating diverse textual content. Previous research has mostly tested single models on in-distribution datasets. We tested five specialized transformer-based models on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T06:38:13Z)
• LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool [119.0952092533317]
  Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to high-quality human-authored text. Existing detection tools can only differentiate between machine-generated and human-authored text. We propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:16Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.