Bounds of Chain-of-Thought Robustness: Reasoning Steps, Embed Norms, and Beyond

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21284v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:04:31 GMT
• Title: Bounds of Chain-of-Thought Robustness: Reasoning Steps, Embed Norms, and Beyond
• Authors: Dingzirui Wang, Xuanliang Zhang, Keyan Xu, Qingfu Zhu, Wanxiang Che, Yang Deng,
• Abstract summary: Existing research indicates that the output of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is significantly affected by input perturbations.<n>We theoretically analyze the effect of input perturbations on the fluctuation of CoT outputs.
• Score: 64.88201012057822
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Existing research indicates that the output of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is significantly affected by input perturbations. Although many methods aim to mitigate such impact by optimizing prompts, a theoretical explanation of how these perturbations influence CoT outputs remains an open area of research. This gap limits our in-depth understanding of how input perturbations propagate during the reasoning process and hinders further improvements in prompt optimization methods. Therefore, in this paper, we theoretically analyze the effect of input perturbations on the fluctuation of CoT outputs. We first derive an upper bound for input perturbations under the condition that the output fluctuation is within an acceptable range, based on which we prove that: (i) This upper bound is positively correlated with the number of reasoning steps in the CoT; (ii) Even an infinitely long reasoning process cannot eliminate the impact of input perturbations. We then apply these conclusions to the Linear Self-Attention (LSA) model, which can be viewed as a simplified version of the Transformer. For the LSA model, we prove that the upper bound for input perturbation is negatively correlated with the norms of the input embedding and hidden state vectors. To validate this theoretical analysis, we conduct experiments on three mainstream datasets and four mainstream models. The experimental results align with our theoretical analysis, empirically demonstrating the correctness of our findings.

Related papers

• On the Sample Complexity of Learning for Blind Inverse Problems [8.091533689145908]
  Blind inverse problems arise in many experimental settings where the forward operator is partially or entirely unknown.<n>Data-driven approaches have been proposed to address blind inverse problems, demonstrating strong empirical performance and adaptability.<n>We shed light on learning in blind inverse problems within the simplified yet insightful framework of Linear Minimum Mean Square Estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T11:53:37Z)
• Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization: Minimum-Variance Two-Point Estimators and Directionally Aligned Perturbations [57.179679246370114]
  We identify the distribution of random perturbations that minimizes the estimator's variance as the perturbation stepsize tends to zero.<n>Our findings reveal that such desired perturbations can align directionally with the true gradient, instead of maintaining a fixed length.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T19:06:39Z)
• Analysis of Fourier Neural Operators via Effective Field Theory [11.824913874212802]
  We present a systematic effective field theory analysis of FNOs in an infinite dimensional function space.<n>We show that nonlinear activations inevitably couple frequency inputs to high frequency modes that are otherwise discarded by spectral truncation.<n>Our results quantify how nonlinearity enables neural operators to capture non-trivial features and explain why scale invariant activations and residual connections enhance feature learning in FNOs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T14:10:46Z)
• Generalization or Hallucination? Understanding Out-of-Context Reasoning in Transformers [76.42159902257677]
  We argue that both behaviors stem from a single mechanism known as out-of-context reasoning (OCR)<n>OCR drives both generalization and hallucination, depending on whether the associated concepts are causally related.<n>Our work provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the OCR phenomenon, offering a new lens for analyzing and mitigating undesirable behaviors from knowledge injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T16:50:45Z)
• Disentangling Granularity: An Implicit Inductive Bias in Factorized VAEs [4.987314374901578]
  We study the implicit inductive bias that drive disentanglement in variational autoencoders (VAEs) with factorization priors.<n>We show that disentangling granularity as an implicit inductive bias in factorized VAEs influence both disentanglement performance and the inference of the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO)<n>Our findings unveil that disentangling granularity as an implicit inductive bias in factorized VAEs influence both disentanglement performance and the inference of the ELBO, offering fresh insights into the interpretability and inherent biases of VAEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T15:08:50Z)
• Are We Merely Justifying Results ex Post Facto? Quantifying Explanatory Inversion in Post-Hoc Model Explanations [87.68633031231924]
  Post-hoc explanation methods provide interpretation by attributing predictions to input features.<n>Do these explanations unintentionally reverse the natural relationship between inputs and outputs?<n>We propose Inversion Quantification (IQ), a framework that quantifies the degree to which explanations rely on outputs and deviate from faithful input-output relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T19:00:12Z)
• Quantifying perturbation impacts for large language models [49.1574468325115]
  We introduce Distribution-Based Perturbation Analysis (DBPA), a framework that reformulates perturbation analysis as a frequentist hypothesis testing problem.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of DBPA in evaluating perturbation impacts, showing its versatility for perturbation analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T16:13:09Z)
• A Theoretical Understanding of Chain-of-Thought: Coherent Reasoning and Error-Aware Demonstration [41.88275731297211]
  We show that, compared to Stepwise ICL, the transformer gains better error correction ability and more accurate predictions if the reasoning from earlier steps is integrated. We propose an improvement on CoT by incorporating both correct and incorrect reasoning paths in the demonstration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:07:20Z)
• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• A New Central Limit Theorem for the Augmented IPW Estimator: Variance Inflation, Cross-Fit Covariance and Beyond [0.9172870611255595]
  Cross-fit inverse probability weighting (AIPW) with cross-fitting is a popular choice in practice. We study this cross-fit AIPW estimator under well-specified outcome regression and propensity score models in a high-dimensional regime. Our work utilizes a novel interplay between three distinct tools--approximate message passing theory, the theory of deterministic equivalents, and the leave-one-out approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T14:17:53Z)
• On the Role of Entropy-based Loss for Learning Causal Structures with Continuous Optimization [27.613220411996025]
  A method with non-combinatorial directed acyclic constraint, called NOTEARS, formulates the causal structure learning problem as a continuous optimization problem using least-square loss. We show that the violation of the Gaussian noise assumption will hinder the causal direction identification. We propose a more general entropy-based loss that is theoretically consistent with the likelihood score under any noise distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T08:29:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.