On the Sample Complexity of Learning for Blind Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23405v2
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:00:49 GMT
• Title: On the Sample Complexity of Learning for Blind Inverse Problems
• Authors: Nathan Buskulic, Luca Calatroni, Lorenzo Rosasco, Silvia Villa,
• Abstract summary: Blind inverse problems arise in many experimental settings where the forward operator is partially or entirely unknown.<n>Data-driven approaches have been proposed to address blind inverse problems, demonstrating strong empirical performance and adaptability.<n>We shed light on learning in blind inverse problems within the simplified yet insightful framework of Linear Minimum Mean Square Estimators.
• Score: 8.091533689145908
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Blind inverse problems arise in many experimental settings where the forward operator is partially or entirely unknown. In this context, methods developed for the non-blind case cannot be adapted in a straightforward manner. Recently, data-driven approaches have been proposed to address blind inverse problems, demonstrating strong empirical performance and adaptability. However, these methods often lack interpretability and are not supported by rigorous theoretical guarantees, limiting their reliability in applied domains such as imaging inverse problems. In this work, we shed light on learning in blind inverse problems within the simplified yet insightful framework of Linear Minimum Mean Square Estimators (LMMSEs). We provide an in-depth theoretical analysis, deriving closed-form expressions for optimal estimators and extending classical results. In particular, we establish equivalences with suitably chosen Tikhonov-regularized formulations, where the regularization depends explicitly on the distributions of the unknown signal, the noise, and the random forward operators. We also prove convergence results under appropriate source condition assumptions. Furthermore, we derive rigorous finite-sample error bounds that characterize the performance of learned estimators as a function of the noise level, problem conditioning, and number of available samples. These bounds explicitly quantify the impact of operator randomness and reveal the associated convergence rates as this randomness vanishes. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings through illustrative numerical experiments that confirm the predicted convergence behavior.

Related papers

• Nonparametric Identification and Inference for Counterfactual Distributions with Confounding [6.997978440999076]
  We propose nonparametric identification and semiparametric estimation of joint potential outcome in the presence of confounding.<n>By bridging classical semiparametric theory with modern representation learning, this work provides a robust statistical foundation for distributional and counterfactual inference in complex causal systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T05:00:13Z)
• Optimal kernel regression bounds under energy-bounded noise [3.2093811507874768]
  We derive a tight, non-asymptotic uncertainty bound for kernel-based estimation.<n>We show its effectiveness in returning tight and easy-to-compute bounds for kernel-based estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T11:11:24Z)
• In-Context Parametric Inference: Point or Distribution Estimators? [66.22308335324239]
  We show that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.<n>Our experiments indicate that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T10:00:24Z)
• Error Feedback under $(L_0,L_1)$-Smoothness: Normalization and Momentum [56.37522020675243]
  We provide the first proof of convergence for normalized error feedback algorithms across a wide range of machine learning problems. We show that due to their larger allowable stepsizes, our new normalized error feedback algorithms outperform their non-normalized counterparts on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T10:19:27Z)
• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• Non-Convex Robust Hypothesis Testing using Sinkhorn Uncertainty Sets [18.46110328123008]
  We present a new framework to address the non-robust hypothesis testing problem. The goal is to seek the optimal detector that minimizes the maximum numerical risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T20:29:43Z)
• Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects [1.9253333342733674]
  Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes. We propose a unified and model-agnostic inferential approach for a wide class of partially identified estimands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T08:17:30Z)
• Model-Based Uncertainty in Value Functions [89.31922008981735]
  We focus on characterizing the variance over values induced by a distribution over MDPs. Previous work upper bounds the posterior variance over values by solving a so-called uncertainty Bellman equation. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T09:18:27Z)
• Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noise [64.85879194013407]
  We prove the first high-probability results with logarithmic dependence on the confidence level for methods for solving monotone and structured non-monotone VIPs. Our results match the best-known ones in the light-tails case and are novel for structured non-monotone problems. In addition, we numerically validate that the gradient noise of many practical formulations is heavy-tailed and show that clipping improves the performance of SEG/SGDA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T15:21:55Z)
• Optimal variance-reduced stochastic approximation in Banach spaces [114.8734960258221]
  We study the problem of estimating the fixed point of a contractive operator defined on a separable Banach space. We establish non-asymptotic bounds for both the operator defect and the estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T02:46:57Z)
• From Optimality to Robustness: Dirichlet Sampling Strategies in Stochastic Bandits [0.0]
  We study a generic Dirichlet Sampling (DS) algorithm, based on pairwise comparisons of empirical indices computed with re-sampling of the arms' observations. We show that different variants of this strategy achieve provably optimal regret guarantees when the distributions are bounded and logarithmic regret for semi-bounded distributions with a mild quantile condition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T14:34:21Z)
• Estimating means of bounded random variables by betting [39.98103047898974]
  This paper derives confidence intervals (CI) and time-uniform confidence sequences (CS) for the classical problem of estimating an unknown mean from bounded observations. We present a general approach for deriving concentration bounds, that can be seen as a generalization and improvement of the celebrated Chernoff method. We show how to extend these ideas to sampling without replacement, another heavily studied problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T17:22:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.