Effect of Model Merging in Domain-Specific Ad-hoc Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21966v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 06:54:23 GMT
• Title: Effect of Model Merging in Domain-Specific Ad-hoc Retrieval
• Abstract summary: Model merging is a technique that combines the diverse characteristics of multiple models.<n>We merged the weights of a source retrieval model and a domain-specific (non-retrieval) model using a linear approach.<n>The experimental results indicate that model merging has the potential to produce more effective domain-specific retrieval models.
• Score: 1.1164586555084026
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this study, we evaluate the effect of model merging in ad-hoc retrieval tasks. Model merging is a technique that combines the diverse characteristics of multiple models. We hypothesized that applying model merging to domain-specific ad-hoc retrieval tasks could improve retrieval effectiveness. To verify this hypothesis, we merged the weights of a source retrieval model and a domain-specific (non-retrieval) model using a linear interpolation approach. A key advantage of our approach is that it requires no additional fine-tuning of the models. We conducted two experiments each in the medical and Japanese domains. The first compared the merged model with the source retrieval model, and the second compared it with a LoRA fine-tuned model under both full and limited data settings for model construction. The experimental results indicate that model merging has the potential to produce more effective domain-specific retrieval models than the source retrieval model, and may serve as a practical alternative to LoRA fine-tuning, particularly when only a limited amount of data is available.

Related papers

• From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human behavior.<n>Treating an LLM's output as a single data point underutilizes the information inherent to the probabilistic nature of LLMs.<n>This paper introduces and formalizes "model belief," a measure derived from an LLM's token-level probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T03:50:40Z)
• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging [51.18155031364046]
  Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model.<n>Recent model merging methods have shown promising results, but struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases.<n>We show that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T14:10:46Z)
• Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models [73.98345036483299]
  We study model evolution through iterative merging, drawing an analogy to biological evolution.<n>We show that model kinship is closely linked to the performance improvements achieved by merging.<n>We propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T14:29:29Z)
• EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging [55.03509900949149]
  We show that Elect, Mask & Rescale-Merging (EMR-Merging) shows outstanding performance compared to existing merging methods. EMR-Merging is tuning-free, thus requiring no data availability or any additional training while showing impressive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:25:45Z)
• CONTRAST: Continual Multi-source Adaptation to Dynamic Distributions [42.293444710522294]
  Continual Multi-source Adaptation to Dynamic Distributions (CONTRAST) is a novel method that optimally combines multiple source models to adapt to the dynamic test data. We show that the proposed method is able to optimally combine the source models and prioritize updates to the model least prone to forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T22:23:56Z)
• The Importance of Downstream Networks in Digital Pathology Foundation Models [1.689369173057502]
  We evaluate seven feature extractor models across three different datasets with 162 different aggregation model configurations. We find that the performance of many current feature extractor models is notably similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T16:54:25Z)
• Increasing Performance And Sample Efficiency With Model-agnostic Interactive Feature Attributions [3.0655581300025996]
  We provide model-agnostic implementations for two popular explanation methods (Occlusion and Shapley values) to enforce entirely different attributions in the complex model. We show how our proposed approach can significantly improve the model's performance only by augmenting its training dataset based on corrected explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T15:23:28Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [47.432215933099016]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models.<n>This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model.<n>We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
• Robust Finite Mixture Regression for Heterogeneous Targets [70.19798470463378]
  We propose an FMR model that finds sample clusters and jointly models multiple incomplete mixed-type targets simultaneously. We provide non-asymptotic oracle performance bounds for our model under a high-dimensional learning framework. The results show that our model can achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T03:27:07Z)
• Data from Model: Extracting Data from Non-robust and Robust Models [83.60161052867534]
  This work explores the reverse process of generating data from a model, attempting to reveal the relationship between the data and the model. We repeat the process of Data to Model (DtM) and Data from Model (DfM) in sequence and explore the loss of feature mapping information. Our results show that the accuracy drop is limited even after multiple sequences of DtM and DfM, especially for robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T05:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.