A Systematic Review: Affective Perception on Urban Facades
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22599v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:18:02 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Review: Affective Perception on Urban Facades
- Authors: Chenxi Wang, Haining Ding, Michal Gath-Morad,
- Abstract summary: Architectural facades critically shape affective perception in urban environments.<n>Despite growing interest in affective responses to the built environment, the affective impact of urban architectural facades remains under-theorized.
- Score: 2.770226625653906
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Architectural facades critically shape affective perception in urban environments. Here, affect is understood as a multidimensional psychological construct encompassing valence (pleasure-displeasure) and arousal (activation-deactivation). Despite growing interest in affective responses to the built environment, the affective impact of urban architectural facades remains under-theorized. This study conducts a systematic review of 61 works, guided by the PRISMA framework, to identify which facade attributes most strongly predict affective responses operationalized as valence and arousal. Through multi-scalar synthesis and knowledge mapping, the review highlights complexity, materiality, symmetry, and bibliophilic integration as consistent predictors of affective perception across urban, building, and detail levels. Computational tools such as eye-tracking, CNN-based analysis, and parametric modeling are increasingly employed, yet remain fragmented and often overlook intangible dimensions like narrative coherence and cultural symbolism. By consolidating cross-disciplinary evidence, this review proposes a theoretical model linking physical design features to affective outcomes, and identifies methodological gaps, particularly the lack of integrative, mixed-method approaches. The findings offer a foundation for affect-aware facade design, advancing evidence-based strategies to support psychological well-being in urban contexts.
Related papers
- From Perception to Action: An Interactive Benchmark for Vision Reasoning [51.11355591375073]
Causal Hierarchy of Actions and Interactions (CHAIN) benchmark designed to evaluate whether models can understand, plan, and execute structured action sequences grounded in physical constraints.<n> CHAIN shifts evaluation from passive perception to active problem solving, spanning tasks such as interlocking mechanical puzzles and 3D stacking and packing.<n>Our results show that top-performing models still struggle to internalize physical structure and causal constraints, often failing to produce reliable long-horizon plans and cannot robustly translate perceived structure into effective actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-24T15:33:02Z) - ArtCognition: A Multimodal AI Framework for Affective State Sensing from Visual and Kinematic Drawing Cues [0.0]
This paper introduces digital drawing as a rich and underexplored modality for affective sensing.<n>We present a novel multimodal framework, named ArtCognition, for the automated analysis of the House-Tree-Person test.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T17:35:37Z) - Bridging Cognitive Gap: Hierarchical Description Learning for Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment [51.40989269202702]
aesthetic quality assessment task is crucial for developing a human-aligned quantitative evaluation system for AIGC.<n>We propose ArtQuant, an aesthetics assessment framework for artistic images which couples isolated aesthetic dimensions through description generation.<n>Our approach achieves epoch state-of-the-art performance on several datasets while requiring only 33% of conventional trainings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T12:18:26Z) - Visual Categorization Across Minds and Models: Cognitive Analysis of Human Labeling and Neuro-Symbolic Integration [0.0]
This paper examines image labeling performance across human participants and deep neural networks.<n>We contrast human strategies such as analogical reasoning, shape-based recognition, and confidence modulation with AI's feature-based processing.<n>Our findings highlight key parallels and divergences between biological and artificial systems in representation, inference, and confidence calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T05:58:12Z) - Leveraging Geometric Visual Illusions as Perceptual Inductive Biases for Vision Models [15.629707528331672]
We introduce a synthetic, parametric geometric-illusion dataset and evaluate three multi-source learning strategies that combine illusion recognition tasks with ImageNet classification objectives.<n>Our experiments reveal two key conceptual insights: (i) incorporating geometric illusions as auxiliary supervision systematically improves generalization, especially in visually challenging cases involving intricate contours and fine textures.<n>These results demonstrate a novel integration of perceptual science and machine learning and suggest new directions for embedding perceptual priors into vision model design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-18T17:00:42Z) - Understanding Learning Dynamics Through Structured Representations [1.7244210453129227]
This paper investigates how internal structural choices shape the behavior of learning systems.<n>We analyze how these structures influence gradient flow, spectral sensitivity, and fixed-point behavior.<n>Rather than prescribing fixed templates, we emphasize principles of tractable design that can steer learning behavior in interpretable ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T07:15:57Z) - SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluation [121.1493852562597]
Spatial intelligence (SI) represents a cognitive ability encompassing the visualization, manipulation, and reasoning about spatial relationships.<n>We introduce SITE, a benchmark dataset towards SI Thorough Evaluation.<n>Our approach to curating the benchmark combines a bottom-up survey about 31 existing datasets and a top-down strategy drawing upon three classification systems in cognitive science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T17:45:44Z) - How Metacognitive Architectures Remember Their Own Thoughts: A Systematic Review [16.35521789216079]
Metacognition has gained significant attention for its potential to enhance autonomy and adaptability of artificial agents.<n>Existing overviews remain at a conceptual level that is undiscerning to the underlying algorithms, representations, and their respective success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T08:48:41Z) - A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs [3.2228025627337864]
This paper introduces a structured evaluation framework to dissect the perception-reasoning interface in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>We propose three distinct evaluation paradigms, mirroring human problem-solving strategies.<n>Applying this framework, we demonstrate that CA, leveraging powerful language models for reasoning over rich, independently generated descriptions, achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T12:42:42Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z) - Impressions: Understanding Visual Semiotics and Aesthetic Impact [66.40617566253404]
We present Impressions, a novel dataset through which to investigate the semiotics of images.
We show that existing multimodal image captioning and conditional generation models struggle to simulate plausible human responses to images.
This dataset significantly improves their ability to model impressions and aesthetic evaluations of images through fine-tuning and few-shot adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:30:18Z) - Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A
Survey [71.43956423427397]
We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance.
This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings.
Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z) - Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias.
A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z) - Affect Analysis in-the-wild: Valence-Arousal, Expressions, Action Units
and a Unified Framework [83.21732533130846]
The paper focuses on large in-the-wild databases, i.e., Aff-Wild and Aff-Wild2.
It presents the design of two classes of deep neural networks trained with these databases.
A novel multi-task and holistic framework is presented which is able to jointly learn and effectively generalize and perform affect recognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-29T17:36:20Z) - Survey on Visual Sentiment Analysis [87.20223213370004]
This paper reviews pertinent publications and tries to present an exhaustive overview of the field of Visual Sentiment Analysis.
The paper also describes principles of design of general Visual Sentiment Analysis systems from three main points of view.
A formalization of the problem is discussed, considering different levels of granularity, as well as the components that can affect the sentiment toward an image in different ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-24T10:15:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.