Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning for Asset-Liability Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23280v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 12:36:51 GMT
• Title: Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning for Asset-Liability Management
• Authors: Yilie Huang,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel approach for Asset-Liability Management (ALM) by employing continuous-time Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We develop a model-free, policy gradient-based soft actor-critic algorithm tailored to ALM for dynamically synchronizing assets and liabilities.<n>Our empirical study evaluates this approach against two enhanced traditional financial strategies, a model-based continuous-time RL method, and three state-of-the-art RL algorithms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper proposes a novel approach for Asset-Liability Management (ALM) by employing continuous-time Reinforcement Learning (RL) with a linear-quadratic (LQ) formulation that incorporates both interim and terminal objectives. We develop a model-free, policy gradient-based soft actor-critic algorithm tailored to ALM for dynamically synchronizing assets and liabilities. To ensure an effective balance between exploration and exploitation with minimal tuning, we introduce adaptive exploration for the actor and scheduled exploration for the critic. Our empirical study evaluates this approach against two enhanced traditional financial strategies, a model-based continuous-time RL method, and three state-of-the-art RL algorithms. Evaluated across 200 randomized market scenarios, our method achieves higher average rewards than all alternative strategies, with rapid initial gains and sustained superior performance. The outperformance stems not from complex neural networks or improved parameter estimation, but from directly learning the optimal ALM strategy without learning the environment.

Related papers

• CoBA-RL: Capability-Oriented Budget Allocation for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs [31.371566320424552]
  CoBA-RL is a reinforcement learning algorithm designed to adaptively allocate rollout budgets based on the model's evolving capability.<n>Our approach effectively orchestrates the trade-off between exploration and exploitation, delivering consistent generalization improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T03:14:36Z)
• Generative Actor Critic [74.04971271003869]
  Generative Actor Critic (GAC) is a novel framework that decouples sequential decision-making by reframing textitpolicy evaluation as learning a generative model of the joint distribution over trajectories and returns.<n>Experiments on Gym-MuJoCo and Maze2D benchmarks demonstrate GAC's strong offline performance and significantly enhanced offline-to-online improvement compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T06:31:11Z)
• LLM-Driven Intrinsic Motivation for Sparse Reward Reinforcement Learning [0.27528170226206433]
  This paper explores the combination of two intrinsic motivation strategies to improve the efficiency of learning agents in environments with extreme sparse rewards.<n>We propose integrating Variational State as Intrinsic Reward (VSIMR), which uses Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs) reward state novelty, with an intrinsic reward approach derived from Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our empirical results show that this combined strategy significantly increases agent performance and efficiency compared to using each strategy individually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T19:10:58Z)
• Your Reward Function for RL is Your Best PRM for Search: Unifying RL and Search-Based TTS [62.22644307952087]
  We introduce AIRL-S, the first natural unification of RL-based and search-based TTS.<n>We leverage adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) combined with group relative policy optimization (GRPO) to learn a dense, dynamic PRM directly from correct reasoning traces.<n>Our results show that our unified approach improves performance by 9 % on average over the base model, matching GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T23:41:15Z)
• Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
  Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z)
• Ring-lite: Scalable Reasoning via C3PO-Stabilized Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [51.21041884010009]
  Ring-lite is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-based large language model optimized via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Our approach matches the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) small-scale reasoning models on challenging benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:12:34Z)
• Learning Dynamic Representations via An Optimally-Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy Optimization Framework for Continual Learning [16.10753846850319]
  Continual learning allows models to persistently acquire and retain information.<n> catastrophic forgetting can severely impair model performance.<n>We introduce a novel framework termed Optimally-Weighted Mean Discrepancy (OWMMD), which imposes penalties on representation alterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T13:33:45Z)
• VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs [66.80143024475635]
  We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.<n>Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
• Maximize to Explore: One Objective Function Fusing Estimation, Planning, and Exploration [87.53543137162488]
  We propose an easy-to-implement online reinforcement learning (online RL) framework called textttMEX. textttMEX integrates estimation and planning components while balancing exploration exploitation automatically. It can outperform baselines by a stable margin in various MuJoCo environments with sparse rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T17:25:26Z)
• Model-based Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithm [4.128216503196621]
  We propose an On-policy Model-based Safe Deep RL algorithm in which we learn the transition dynamics of the environment in an online manner. We show that our algorithm is more sample efficient and results in lower cumulative hazard violations as compared to constrained model-free approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:53:02Z)
• Simplifying Model-based RL: Learning Representations, Latent-space Models, and Policies with One Objective [142.36200080384145]
  We propose a single objective which jointly optimize a latent-space model and policy to achieve high returns while remaining self-consistent. We demonstrate that the resulting algorithm matches or improves the sample-efficiency of the best prior model-based and model-free RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-18T03:51:58Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin Dynamics [51.234482917047835]
  We introduce a sampling perspective to tackle the challenging task of training robust Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. We present a novel, scalable two-player RL algorithm, which is a sampling variant of the two-player policy method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-14T14:59:14Z)
• Ready Policy One: World Building Through Active Learning [35.358315617358976]
  We introduce Ready Policy One (RP1), a framework that views Model-Based Reinforcement Learning as an active learning problem. RP1 achieves this by utilizing a hybrid objective function, which crucially adapts during optimization. We rigorously evaluate our method on a variety of continuous control tasks, and demonstrate statistically significant gains over existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T09:57:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.