How Far Do Time Series Foundation Models Paint the Landscape of Real-World Benchmarks ?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26347v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:53:05 GMT
- Title: How Far Do Time Series Foundation Models Paint the Landscape of Real-World Benchmarks ?
- Authors: Lujun Li, Lama Sleem, Yiqun Wang, Yangjie Xu, Niccolò Gentile, Radu State,
- Abstract summary: This work proposes a novel benchmarking approach that bridges synthetic and realistic data by extracting temporal signals from real-world video.<n>We introduce REAL-V-TSFM, a novel dataset designed to capture rich and diverse time series derived from real-world videos.
- Score: 13.776161145405496
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent evaluations of time-series foundation models (TSFMs) have emphasized synthetic benchmarks, leaving real-world generalization less thoroughly examined. This work proposes a novel benchmarking approach that bridges synthetic and realistic data by extracting temporal signals from real-world video using optical flow and curating datasets reflecting everyday temporal dynamics. Building upon this pipeline, we introduce REAL-V-TSFM, a novel dataset designed to capture rich and diverse time series derived from real-world videos. Experimental results on three state-of-the-art of TSFMs under zero-shot forecasting shows that, despite strong performance on conventional benchmarks, these models predominantly exhibit performance degradation on the proposed dataset, indicating limited generalizability in these foundation models. These findings highlight the urgent need for data-centric benchmarking and diverse model structure to advance TSFMs toward genuine universality, while further validating the effectiveness of our video-based time series data extraction pipeline.
Related papers
- It's TIME: Towards the Next Generation of Time Series Forecasting Benchmarks [87.7937890373758]
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are revolutionizing the forecasting landscape from specific dataset modeling to generalizable task evaluation.<n>We introduce TIME, a next-generation task-centric benchmark comprising 50 fresh datasets and 98 forecasting tasks.<n>We propose a novel pattern-level evaluation perspective that moves beyond traditional dataset-level evaluations based on static meta labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T16:31:01Z) - Universal Redundancies in Time Series Foundation Models [3.8551402560229806]
Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) leverage extensive pretraining to accurately predict unseen time series during inference.<n>We introduce a set of tools for mechanistic interpretability of TSFMs, including ablations of specific components and direct logit attribution on the residual stream.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T03:53:46Z) - OATS: Online Data Augmentation for Time Series Foundation Models [49.1394215208561]
Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) are a powerful paradigm for time analysis and are often enhanced by synthetic data augmentation to improve the training data quality.<n>We propose OATS (Online Data Augmentation for Time Series Foundation Models), a principled strategy that generates synthetic data tailored to different training steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T23:51:03Z) - Estimating Time Series Foundation Model Transferability via In-Context Learning [74.65355820906355]
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting via large-scale pre-training.<n>Fine-tuning remains critical for boosting performance in domains with limited public data.<n>We introduce TimeTic, a transferability estimation framework that recasts model selection as an in-context-learning problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T07:07:13Z) - ARIES: Relation Assessment and Model Recommendation for Deep Time Series Forecasting [54.57031153712623]
ARIES is a framework for assessing relation between time series properties and modeling strategies.<n>We propose the first deep forecasting model recommender, capable of providing interpretable suggestions for real-world time series.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T13:57:14Z) - MAWIFlow Benchmark: Realistic Flow-Based Evaluation for Network Intrusion Detection [47.86433139298671]
This paper introduces MAWIFlow, a flow-based benchmark derived from the MAWILAB v1.1 dataset.<n>The resulting datasets comprise temporally distinct samples from January 2011, 2016, and 2021, drawn from trans-Pacific backbone traffic.<n>Traditional machine learning methods, including Decision Trees, Random Forests, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression, are compared to a deep learning model based on a CNN-BiLSTM architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T14:51:35Z) - On the Power of Heuristics in Temporal Graphs [2.5957835343537266]
We introduce metrics that quantify the impact of recency and popularity across datasets.<n>Results emphasize the importance of refined evaluation schemes to enable fair comparisons and promote the development of more robust temporal graph models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T13:28:31Z) - Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models on Noisy Periodic Time Series [0.0]
This paper presents an empirical study evaluating the performance of time series foundation models (TSFMs) over two datasets constituting noisy periodic time series.<n>Our findings demonstrate that while for time series with bounded periods, TSFMs can match or outperform the statistical approaches, their forecasting abilities deteriorate with longer periods, higher noise levels, lower sampling rates and more complex shapes of the time series.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-01T16:36:21Z) - Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Time Series Forecasting [61.021413959988216]
Time series forecasting plays a critical role in various real-world applications, including energy consumption prediction, disease transmission monitoring, and weather forecasting.
Most existing methods rely on a centralized training paradigm, where large amounts of data are collected from distributed devices to a central cloud server.
We propose a novel framework, Fed-TREND, to address data heterogeneity by generating informative synthetic data as auxiliary knowledge carriers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-24T04:56:45Z) - ViTime: Foundation Model for Time Series Forecasting Powered by Vision Intelligence [49.60944381032587]
Time series forecasting (TSF) possesses great practical values in various fields, including power and energy, transportation, etc.<n>TSF models have long been known to be problem-specific and lacking application generalizability.<n>This paper proposes a vision intelligence-powered framework, ViTime, for the first time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T02:11:01Z) - LTSM-Bundle: A Toolbox and Benchmark on Large Language Models for Time Series Forecasting [69.33802286580786]
We introduce LTSM-Bundle, a comprehensive toolbox, and benchmark for training LTSMs.<n>It modularized and benchmarked LTSMs from multiple dimensions, encompassing prompting strategies, tokenization approaches, base model selection, data quantity, and dataset diversity.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that this combination achieves superior zero-shot and few-shot performances compared to state-of-the-art LTSMs and traditional TSF methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T07:09:19Z) - TEMPO: Prompt-based Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Time Series Forecasting [24.834846119163885]
We propose a novel framework, TEMPO, that can effectively learn time series representations.
TEMPO expands the capability for dynamically modeling real-world temporal phenomena from data within diverse domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T00:02:25Z) - A Multi-Channel Neural Graphical Event Model with Negative Evidence [76.51278722190607]
Event datasets are sequences of events of various types occurring irregularly over the time-line.
We propose a non-parametric deep neural network approach in order to estimate the underlying intensity functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-21T23:10:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.