Institutional Policy Pathways for Supporting Research Software: Global Trends and Local Practices
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26422v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 15:45:39 GMT
- Title: Institutional Policy Pathways for Supporting Research Software: Global Trends and Local Practices
- Authors: Michelle Barker, Jeremy Cohen, Pedro Hernández Serrano, Daniel S. Katz, Kim Martin, Dan Rudmann, Hugh Shanahan,
- Abstract summary: Research-performing organisations (RPOs) need to ensure that their investment in people, skills and infrastructure around research software produces sustainable and maintainable software.<n>This article outlines the work of the Policies in Research Organisations for Research Software (PRO4RS) Working Group, a joint initiative of the Research Software Alliance (ReSA) and the Research Data Alliance (RDA)<n>After consideration of the rationale for institutional policies on research software, the PRO4RS WG outputs and analysis are utilised to highlight critical policy gaps.
- Score: 0.9088208602104103
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As research software becomes increasingly central to modern science, research-performing organisations (RPOs) need to ensure that their investment in people, skills and infrastructure around research software produces sustainable and maintainable software that improves the research they perform, which in turn improves the overall institution and its reputation and funding, for example, by competing with peers who lack this approach. However, research institution management and recognition of research software and its personnel has mostly often developed in an ad hoc manner. RPO training infrastructures, recognition and reward structures, have not developed at a sufficient rate to support and encourage both the widespread use of research software best practices and the long-term support for technical roles that is required. To begin to address this fundamental problem for modern research environments, RPOs must implement and adopt robust policies to support research software development, use, and sustainability. Despite growing momentum from funders and publishers around FAIR and open science principles, research institutional-level policies specifically addressing research software remain limited or lacking in breadth. This article outlines the work of the Policies in Research Organisations for Research Software (PRO4RS) Working Group (WG), a joint initiative of the Research Software Alliance (ReSA) and the Research Data Alliance (RDA), which examined and advanced research software policy development across institutions worldwide. After consideration of the rationale for institutional policies on research software, the PRO4RS WG outputs and analysis are utilised to highlight critical policy gaps, particularly related to consideration of research software personnel in policy work focused on reform of research assessment.
Related papers
- SHAPR: A Solo Human-Centred and AI-Assisted Practice Framework for Research Software Development [0.0]
This paper proposes the SHAPR (Solo, Human-centred, AI-assisted PRactice) as a practice-level operational framework.<n>By explicitly linking research software development, Human-AI collaboration, and reflective learning, this study contributes to broader discussions on how SHAPR can support both knowledge production and HDR researcher training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T22:02:39Z) - The Role of Computing Resources in Publishing Foundation Model Research [84.20094600030092]
We evaluate the relationship between these resources and the scientific advancement of foundation models (FM)<n>We reviewed 6517 FM papers published between 2022 to 2024, and surveyed 229 first-authors to the impact of computing resources on scientific output.<n>We find that increased computing is correlated with national funding allocations and citations, but our findings don't observe the strong correlations with research environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T14:50:45Z) - AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z) - Ten simple rules for PIs to integrate Research Software Engineering into their research group [1.9456909628552024]
Research Software Engineering (RSEng) is a key success factor in producing high-quality research software.<n>RSEng also often comes with technical complexity, and therefore reduced accessibility to some researchers.<n>The ten simple rules presented in this paper aim to improve the accessibility of RSEng.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T07:59:37Z) - Quantitative analysis of the value of investment in research facilities, with examples from cyberinfrastructure [0.0]
How much to invest in research facilities has long been a question in higher education and research policy.<n>We present techniques for assessing the quantitative value created or received as a result of investments in research facilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T00:31:13Z) - FAIRSECO: An Extensible Framework for Impact Measurement of Research Software [1.549241498953151]
Existing methods for crediting research software and Research Software Engineers have proven to be insufficient.
We have developed FAIRSECO, an open source framework with the objective of assessing the impact of research software in research through the evaluation of various factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T15:22:48Z) - RSMM: A Framework to Assess Maturity of Research Software Project [1.285353663787249]
This paper introduces RSMM, a framework for evaluating and refining research software management.
RSMM offers a structured pathway for evaluating and refining research software management by categorizing 79 best practices.
Individuals as well as organizations involved in research software development gain a systematic approach to tackling various research software engineering challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T21:10:05Z) - An Open Community-Driven Model For Sustainable Research Software:
Sustainable Research Software Institute [0.586336038845426]
The Sustainable Research Software Institute (SRSI) Model promotes sustainable practices in the research software community.
This white paper provides an in-depth overview of the SRSI Model, outlining its objectives, services, funding mechanisms, collaborations, and the potential impact it could have on the research software community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T01:00:32Z) - Application of Text Analytics in Public Service Co-Creation: Literature
Review and Research Framework [68.8204255655161]
An alternative to the traditional top-down development of public services is co-creation of public services.
Co-creation promotes collaboration between stakeholders with the aim to create better public services and achieve public values.
We study existing works on the application of Text Analytics (TA) techniques on text data to support public service co-creation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T17:34:17Z) - Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future
Directions [119.67643184567623]
We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past.
We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized.
Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z) - Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators
for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines.
We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA.
FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.