SPATA: Systematic Pattern Analysis for Detailed and Transparent Data Cards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26640v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:59:45 GMT
• Title: SPATA: Systematic Pattern Analysis for Detailed and Transparent Data Cards
• Authors: João Vitorino, Eva Maia, Isabel Praça, Carlos Soares,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents Systematic Pattern Analysis (SPATA) to provide more detailed and transparent data cards.<n>SPATA computes the projection of each data instance into a discrete space where they can be analyzed and compared, without risking data leakage.
• Score: 4.332839547082766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Due to the susceptibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to data perturbations and adversarial examples, it is crucial to perform a thorough robustness evaluation before any Machine Learning (ML) model is deployed. However, examining a model's decision boundaries and identifying potential vulnerabilities typically requires access to the training and testing datasets, which may pose risks to data privacy and confidentiality. To improve transparency in organizations that handle confidential data or manage critical infrastructure, it is essential to allow external verification and validation of AI without the disclosure of private datasets. This paper presents Systematic Pattern Analysis (SPATA), a deterministic method that converts any tabular dataset to a domain-independent representation of its statistical patterns, to provide more detailed and transparent data cards. SPATA computes the projection of each data instance into a discrete space where they can be analyzed and compared, without risking data leakage. These projected datasets can be reliably used for the evaluation of how different features affect ML model robustness and for the generation of interpretable explanations of their behavior, contributing to more trustworthy AI.

Related papers

• Detecting Cybersecurity Threats by Integrating Explainable AI with SHAP Interpretability and Strategic Data Sampling [0.0]
  The framework addresses three fundamental challenges in deploying AI for threat detection.<n>Our approach maintains detection efficacy while reducing computational overhead.<n>It provides a robust foundation for deploying trustworthy AI systems in security operations centers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T08:01:14Z)
• OpenDataArena: A Fair and Open Arena for Benchmarking Post-Training Dataset Value [74.80873109856563]
  OpenDataArena (ODA) is a holistic and open platform designed to benchmark the intrinsic value of post-training data.<n>ODA establishes a comprehensive ecosystem comprising four key pillars: (i) a unified training-evaluation pipeline that ensures fair, open comparisons across diverse models; (ii) a multi-dimensional scoring framework that profiles data quality along tens of distinct axes; and (iii) an interactive data lineage explorer to visualize dataset genealogy and dissect component sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T03:33:24Z)
• DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [70.77570343385928]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z)
• Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Using Generative Adversarial Networks [1.4091801425319963]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, but its robustness is threatened by Byzantine behaviors such as data and model poisoning.<n>We present a defense framework that addresses these challenges by leveraging a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) at the server to synthesize representative data for validating client updates.<n>This approach eliminates reliance on external datasets, adapts to diverse attack strategies, and integrates seamlessly into standard FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T18:00:56Z)
• Meta-Statistical Learning: Supervised Learning of Statistical Inference [59.463430294611626]
  This work demonstrates that the tools and principles driving the success of large language models (LLMs) can be repurposed to tackle distribution-level tasks.<n>We propose meta-statistical learning, a framework inspired by multi-instance learning that reformulates statistical inference tasks as supervised learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:04:39Z)
• Privacy Preservation through Practical Machine Unlearning [0.0]
  This paper examines methods such as Naive Retraining and Exact Unlearning via the SISA framework.<n>We explore the potential of integrating unlearning principles into Positive Unlabeled (PU) Learning to address challenges posed by partially labeled datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:25:27Z)
• DSAI: Unbiased and Interpretable Latent Feature Extraction for Data-Centric AI [24.349800949355465]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to objectively identify latent characteristics in large datasets.<n>We propose Data Scientist AI (DSAI), a framework that enables unbiased and interpretable feature extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:05Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Anonymizing text that contains sensitive information is crucial for a wide range of applications.<n>Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of the re-identification ability of large language models.<n>We propose a framework composed of three key components: a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• AttributionScanner: A Visual Analytics System for Model Validation with Metadata-Free Slice Finding [29.07617945233152]
  Data slice finding is an emerging technique for validating machine learning (ML) models by identifying and analyzing subgroups in a dataset that exhibit poor performance.<n>This approach faces significant challenges, including the laborious and costly requirement for additional metadata.<n>We introduce AttributionScanner, an innovative human-in-the-loop Visual Analytics (VA) system, designed for metadata-free data slice finding.<n>Our system identifies interpretable data slices that involve common model behaviors and visualizes these patterns through an Attribution Mosaic design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:17:32Z)
• Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection [8.12993269922936]
  We argue that data collection for AI should be performed in a responsible manner. We propose a Responsible AI (RAI) methodology designed to guide the data collection with a set of metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T18:01:27Z)
• Data AUDIT: Identifying Attribute Utility- and Detectability-Induced Bias in Task Models [8.420252576694583]
  We present a first technique for the rigorous, quantitative screening of medical image datasets. Our method decomposes the risks associated with dataset attributes in terms of their detectability and utility. Using our method, we show our screening method reliably identifies nearly imperceptible bias-inducing artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T16:50:15Z)
• Data-SUITE: Data-centric identification of in-distribution incongruous examples [81.21462458089142]
  Data-SUITE is a data-centric framework to identify incongruous regions of in-distribution (ID) data. We empirically validate Data-SUITE's performance and coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T18:58:31Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.