Retrieval-Augmented Framework for LLM-Based Clinical Decision Support

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01363v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 18:45:25 GMT
• Title: Retrieval-Augmented Framework for LLM-Based Clinical Decision Support
• Authors: Leon Garza, Anantaa Kotal, Michael A. Grasso, Emre Umucu,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a clinical decision support system powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist prescribing clinicians.<n>The framework integrates natural language processing with structured clinical inputs to produce contextually relevant recommendations.<n>We outline the system's technical components, including representation representation alignment and generation strategies.
• Score: 0.19999259391104388
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The increasing complexity of clinical decision-making, alongside the rapid expansion of electronic health records (EHR), presents both opportunities and challenges for delivering data-informed care. This paper proposes a clinical decision support system powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist prescribing clinicians. The system generates therapeutic suggestions by analyzing historical EHR data, including patient demographics, presenting complaints, clinical symptoms, diagnostic information, and treatment histories. The framework integrates natural language processing with structured clinical inputs to produce contextually relevant recommendations. Rather than replacing clinician judgment, it is designed to augment decision-making by retrieving and synthesizing precedent cases with comparable characteristics, drawing on local datasets or federated sources where applicable. At its core, the system employs a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline that harmonizes unstructured narratives and codified data to support LLM-based inference. We outline the system's technical components, including representation representation alignment and generation strategies. Preliminary evaluations, conducted with de-identified and synthetic clinical datasets, examine the clinical plausibility and consistency of the model's outputs. Early findings suggest that LLM-based tools may provide valuable decision support in prescribing workflows when appropriately constrained and rigorously validated. This work represents an initial step toward integration of generative AI into real-world clinical decision-making with an emphasis on transparency, safety, and alignment with established practices.

Related papers

• MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
  We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z)
• MED-COPILOT: A Medical Assistant Powered by GraphRAG and Similar Patient Case Retrieval [12.265116154395434]
  We present MED-COPILOT, an interactive clinical decision-support system designed for clinicians and medical trainees.<n>The system builds a structured knowledge graph from WHO and NICE guidelines, applies community-level summarization for efficient retrieval, and maintains a 36,000-case similar-patient database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T04:32:03Z)
• ClinDEF: A Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Clinical Reasoning [58.01333341218153]
  We propose ClinDEF, a dynamic framework for assessing clinical reasoning in LLMs through simulated diagnostic dialogues.<n>Our method generates patient cases and facilitates multi-turn interactions between an LLM-based doctor and an automated patient agent.<n>Experiments show that ClinDEF effectively exposes critical clinical reasoning gaps in state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T12:58:58Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• From EMR Data to Clinical Insight: An LLM-Driven Framework for Automated Pre-Consultation Questionnaire Generation [9.269061009613033]
  We propose a novel framework for generating pre-consultation questionnaires from complex Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)<n>This framework overcomes limitations of direct methods by building explicit clinical knowledge.<n> Evaluated on a real-world EMR dataset and validated by clinical experts, our method demonstrates superior performance in information coverage, diagnostic relevance, understandability, and generation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T12:24:49Z)
• Bringing CLIP to the Clinic: Dynamic Soft Labels and Negation-Aware Learning for Medical Analysis [0.9944647907864256]
  We propose a novel approach that integrates clinically-enhanced dynamic soft labels and medical graphical alignment.<n>Our approach is easily integrated into the medical CLIP training pipeline and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T08:00:18Z)
• Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching [0.24554686192257422]
  Review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontology can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption.<n>Further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T11:45:50Z)
• A Survey on Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems [42.740755280486546]
  This paper provides a survey of human-centered evaluations of Explainable AI methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems.<n>Our findings reveal key challenges in the integration of XAI into healthcare and propose a structured framework to align the evaluation methods of XAI with the clinical needs of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T01:21:29Z)
• Named Clinical Entity Recognition Benchmark [2.9332007863461893]
  This report introduces a Named Clinical Entity Recognition Benchmark. It addresses the crucial natural language processing (NLP) task of extracting structured information from clinical narratives. The leaderboard provides a standardized platform for assessing diverse language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T14:00:18Z)
• Knowledge-Infused Prompting: Assessing and Advancing Clinical Text Data Generation with Large Language Models [46.32860360019374]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in this domain, but their direct deployment can lead to privacy issues.<n>We propose an innovative, resource-efficient approach, ClinGen, which infuses knowledge into the process.<n>Our empirical study across 7 clinical NLP tasks and 16 datasets reveals that ClinGen consistently enhances performance across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T04:37:28Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• Health improvement framework for planning actionable treatment process using surrogate Bayesian model [1.2468700211588881]
  This study proposes a novel framework to plan treatment processes in a data-driven manner. A key point of the framework is the evaluation of the "actionability" for personal health improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T06:02:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.