From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02389v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:27:18 GMT
- Title: From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localization
- Authors: Haoran Xi, Minghao Shao, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Muhammad Shafique, Ramesh Karri,
- Abstract summary: We present T2L-Agent, a project-level, end-to-end framework that plans its own analysis and narrows scope from modules to exact vulnerable lines.<n>We benchmark T2L-ARVO, a diverse, expert-verified 50-case benchmark spanning five crash families and real-world projects.<n>On T2L-ARVO, T2L-Agent achieves up to 58.0% detection and 54.8% line-level localization, substantially outperforming baselines.
- Score: 14.474705451897691
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models show promise for vulnerability discovery, yet prevailing methods inspect code in isolation, struggle with long contexts, and focus on coarse function- or file-level detections - offering limited actionable guidance to engineers who need precise line-level localization and targeted patches in real-world software development. We present T2L-Agent (Trace-to-Line Agent), a project-level, end-to-end framework that plans its own analysis and progressively narrows scope from modules to exact vulnerable lines. T2L-Agent couples multi-round feedback with an Agentic Trace Analyzer (ATA) that fuses runtime evidence - crash points, stack traces, and coverage deltas - with AST-based code chunking, enabling iterative refinement beyond single pass predictions and translating symptoms into actionable, line-level diagnoses. To benchmark line-level vulnerability discovery, we introduce T2L-ARVO, a diverse, expert-verified 50-case benchmark spanning five crash families and real-world projects. T2L-ARVO is specifically designed to support both coarse-grained detection and fine-grained localization, enabling rigorous evaluation of systems that aim to move beyond file-level predictions. On T2L-ARVO, T2L-Agent achieves up to 58.0% detection and 54.8% line-level localization, substantially outperforming baselines. Together, the framework and benchmark push LLM-based vulnerability detection from coarse identification toward deployable, robust, precision diagnostics that reduce noise and accelerate patching in open-source software workflows.
Related papers
- Execution-State-Aware LLM Reasoning for Automated Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation [36.950993500170014]
We present DrillAgent, an agentic framework that reformulates PoV generation as an iterative hypothesis-verification-refinement process.<n>We evaluate DrillAgent on SEC-bench, a large-scale benchmark of real-world C/C++ vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-14T03:17:27Z) - Explainable and Fine-Grained Safeguarding of LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Bi-Level Graph Anomaly Detection [76.91230292971115]
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown strong capabilities in solving complex tasks.<n>XG-Guard is an explainable and fine-grained safeguarding framework for detecting malicious agents in MAS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-21T13:46:36Z) - InspectCoder: Dynamic Analysis-Enabled Self Repair through interactive LLM-Debugger Collaboration [71.18377595277018]
Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate buggy code with complex logic errors that are challenging to diagnose.<n>We present InspectCoder, the first agentic program repair system that empowers LLMs to actively conduct dynamic analysis via interactive debugger control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T06:26:29Z) - DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Models [60.713908578319256]
We propose Direct Discrepancy Learning (DDL) to optimize the detector with task-oriented knowledge.<n>Built upon this, we introduce DetectAnyLLM, a unified detection framework that achieves state-of-the-art MGTD performance.<n>MIRAGE samples human-written texts from 10 corpora across 5 text-domains, which are then re-generated or revised using 17 cutting-edge LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-15T10:59:57Z) - VulAgent: Hypothesis-Validation based Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection [55.957275374847484]
VulAgent is a multi-agent vulnerability detection framework based on hypothesis validation.<n>It implements a semantics-sensitive, multi-view detection pipeline, each aligned to a specific analysis perspective.<n>On average, VulAgent improves overall accuracy by 6.6%, increases the correct identification rate of vulnerable--fixed code pairs by up to 450%, and reduces the false positive rate by about 36%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-15T02:25:38Z) - Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z) - SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [58.29510889419971]
Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations.<n>We introduce a general and scalable benchmark construction framework that begins with manually validated, high-quality seed examples and expands them via targeted mutations.<n>Applying this framework to Python, C/C++, and Java, we build SeCodePLT, a dataset of more than 5.9k samples spanning 44 CWE-based risk categories and three security capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z) - A Multi-Agent Approach to Fault Localization via Graph-Based Retrieval and Reflexion [8.22737389683156]
Traditional fault localization techniques require extensive training datasets and high computational resources.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities by enhancing code understanding and reasoning.<n>We propose LLM4FL, a multi-agent fault localization framework that utilizes three specialized LLM agents.<n> evaluated on the Defects4J benchmark, which includes 675 faults from 14 Java projects, LLM4FL achieves an 18.55% improvement in Top-1 accuracy over AutoFL and 4.82% over SoapFL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T16:47:34Z) - Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses.
Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives.
The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z) - Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [8.167614500821223]
We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction.
Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul) with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T19:18:05Z) - DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning [56.887047551101574]
We present DS-Agent, a novel framework that harnesses large language models (LLMs) agent and case-based reasoning (CBR)
In the development stage, DS-Agent follows the CBR framework to structure an automatic iteration pipeline, which can flexibly capitalize on the expert knowledge from Kaggle.
In the deployment stage, DS-Agent implements a low-resource deployment stage with a simplified CBR paradigm, significantly reducing the demand on foundational capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T12:26:07Z) - Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets.
Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets.
We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.