Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03156v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 16:28:31 GMT
• Title: Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Language
• Authors: Iñigo Parra,
• Abstract summary: This study tests whether previous results are robust to several possible concerns.<n>Results confirm and strengthen the results of previous research and contribute to the debate on the biological plausibility and interpretability of state-of-the-art large language models.
• Score: 0.5076419064097734
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Previous work has shown correlations between the hidden states of large language models and fMRI brain responses, on language tasks. These correlations have been taken as evidence of the representational similarity of these models and brain states. This study tests whether these previous results are robust to several possible concerns. Specifically this study shows: (i) that the previous results are still found after dimensionality reduction, and thus are not attributable to the curse of dimensionality; (ii) that previous results are confirmed when using new measures of similarity; (iii) that correlations between brain representations and those from models are specific to models trained on human language; and (iv) that the results are dependent on the presence of positional encoding in the models. These results confirm and strengthen the results of previous research and contribute to the debate on the biological plausibility and interpretability of state-of-the-art large language models.

Related papers

• Modeling cognitive processes of natural reading with transformer-based Language Models [2.048226951354646]
  Previous research has shown that models such as N-grams and LSTM networks can partially account for predictability effects in explaining eye movement behaviors.<n>In this study, we extend these findings by evaluating transformer-based models (GPT2, LLaMA-7B, and LLaMA2-7B) to further investigate this relationship.<n>Our results indicate that these architectures outperform earlier models in explaining the variance in Gaze Durations recorded from Rioplantense Spanish readers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T17:47:58Z)
• Generative causal testing to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neuroscience [82.995061475971]
  We present generative causal testing (GCT), a framework for generating concise explanations of language selectivity in the brain.<n>We show that GCT can dissect fine-grained differences between brain areas with similar functional selectivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T15:57:48Z)
• Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model [0.0]
  We explore the representation and processing of Argument Structure Constructions (ASCs) in a recurrent neural language model. Our results show that sentence representations form distinct clusters corresponding to the four ASCs across all hidden layers. This indicates that even a relatively simple, brain-constrained recurrent neural network can effectively differentiate between various construction types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T09:27:41Z)
• fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralization [4.1618731507412505]
  We show that the left-right difference in brain correlation follows a scaling law with the number of parameters. This finding reconciles computational analyses of brain activity using large language models with the classic observation from aphasic patients showing left hemisphere dominance for language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:24:52Z)
• Navigating Brain Language Representations: A Comparative Analysis of Neural Language Models and Psychologically Plausible Models [29.50162863143141]
  We compare encoding performance of various neural language models and psychologically plausible models. Surprisingly, our findings revealed that psychologically plausible models outperformed neural language models across diverse contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T08:48:07Z)
• MulCogBench: A Multi-modal Cognitive Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Chinese and English Computational Language Models [44.74364661212373]
  This paper proposes MulCogBench, a cognitive benchmark dataset collected from native Chinese and English participants. It encompasses a variety of cognitive data, including subjective semantic ratings, eye-tracking, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) Results show that language models share significant similarities with human cognitive data and the similarity patterns are modulated by the data modality and stimuli complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T07:49:57Z)
• Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI [47.498241053872924]
  We tested whether larger open-source models are better at predicting brain responses recorded using fMRI. Similar logarithmic behavior was observed when scaling the size of the fMRI training set. These results suggest that increasing scale in both models and data will yield incredibly effective models of language processing in the brain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T17:53:03Z)
• Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helps [75.84770193489639]
  We examine the impact of test loss, training corpus and model architecture on the prediction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging timecourses of participants listening to an audiobook. We find that untrained versions of each model already explain significant amount of signal in the brain by capturing similarity in brain responses across identical words. We suggest good practices for future studies aiming at explaining the human language system using neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T15:37:17Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)
• Multi-timescale Representation Learning in LSTM Language Models [69.98840820213937]
  Language models must capture statistical dependencies between words at timescales ranging from very short to very long. We derived a theory for how the memory gating mechanism in long short-term memory language models can capture power law decay. Experiments showed that LSTM language models trained on natural English text learn to approximate this theoretical distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T02:13:38Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.