Fairness in Token Delegation: Mitigating Voting Power Concentration in DAOs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05830v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:53:40 GMT
- Title: Fairness in Token Delegation: Mitigating Voting Power Concentration in DAOs
- Authors: Johnnatan Messias, Ayae Ide,
- Abstract summary: DAOs aim to enable participatory governance, but in practice face challenges of voter apathy, concentration of voting power, and misaligned delegation.<n>Existing delegation mechanisms often reinforce biases, where a small set of highly ranked delegates accumulate disproportionate influence regardless of their alignment with the broader community.<n>We conduct an empirical study of delegation in governance, combining on-chain data from five major protocols with off-chain discussions from 14 forums.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) aim to enable participatory governance, but in practice face challenges of voter apathy, concentration of voting power, and misaligned delegation. Existing delegation mechanisms often reinforce visibility biases, where a small set of highly ranked delegates accumulate disproportionate influence regardless of their alignment with the broader community. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study of delegation in DAO governance, combining on-chain data from five major protocols with off-chain discussions from 14 DAO forums. We develop a methodology to link forum participants to on-chain addresses, extract governance interests using large language models, and compare these interests against delegates' historical behavior. Our analysis reveals that delegations are frequently misaligned with token holders' expressed priorities and that current ranking-based interfaces exacerbate power concentration. We argue that incorporating interest alignment into delegation processes could mitigate these imbalances and improve the representativeness of DAO decision-making.
Related papers
- Slaying the Dragon: The Quest for Democracy in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) [0.2449909275410288]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are a novel institutional form based on blockchain technology.<n>They aim to redistribute decision-making power through programmable, transparent, and participatory mechanisms.<n>This chapter outlines both the opportunities and challenges they face, including token concentration, low participation, and the risk of de facto centralization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T12:24:46Z) - Voting-Bloc Entropy: A New Metric for DAO Decentralization [12.631360643036137]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) use smart contracts to foster communities working toward common goals.<n>This work proposes a new framework for measuring decentralization called Voting-Bloc Entropy (VBE)<n>VBE is based on the idea that voters with closely aligned interests act as a centralizing force and should be modeled as such.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T17:46:07Z) - Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z) - Extend Adversarial Policy Against Neural Machine Translation via Unknown Token [66.40609413186122]
We propose the DexChar policy' that introduces character perturbations for the existing mainstream adversarial policy based on token substitution.<n>We also improve the self-supervised matching that provides feedback in RL to cater to the semantic constraints required during training adversaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-21T14:43:04Z) - Future of Algorithmic Organization: Large-Scale Analysis of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) [45.02792904507959]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) resemble early online communities, particularly those centered around open-source projects.
In just a few years, the deployment of governance tokens surged with a total of $24.5 billion and 11.1M governance token holders collectively managing decisions across over 13,000s as of 2024.
We examine factors such as voting power, participation, and characteristics dictating the level of decentralization, thus, the efficiency of management structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T23:45:10Z) - Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z) - How to Rationally Select Your Delegatee in PoS [7.541721598051209]
This paper centers around a simple yet crucial question for everyday users: How should one choose their delegated validators within proof-of-stake (PoS) protocols?
We propose a Bayesian model to quantify normal users' trust in delegatees, which we further incorporate into a game-theoretical model to simulate users' reactions.
Our results reveal that users tend to choose their delegatees and utilize their tokens by carefully weighing the delegation cost, the behaviors of other users, and the reputation of delegatees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T06:58:29Z) - The Governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: A Study of Contributors' Influence, Networks, and Shifts in Voting Power [1.8728696177171968]
We present a study analyzing the voting behavior of contributors, or vested users, in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
We evaluate their involvement in decision-making processes, discovering that contributors, on average, held the necessary majority to control governance decisions.
Our findings highlight the central role of contributors across a spectrum of protocols, including Decentralized Finances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-25T15:43:17Z) - Understanding Blockchain Governance: Analyzing Decentralized Voting to Amend DeFi Smart Contracts [17.620751747376726]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel governance mechanism in blockchain ecosystems.<n>We present an in-depth empirical study of the governance protocols of Compound and Uniswaps in DeFi.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their decentralized ideals, current governance mechanisms fall short in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-28T07:45:33Z) - Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in
Practice [54.47385318258732]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision.
In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research.
Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z) - Supercharging Imbalanced Data Learning With Energy-based Contrastive
Representation Transfer [72.5190560787569]
In computer vision, learning from long tailed datasets is a recurring theme, especially for natural image datasets.
Our proposal posits a meta-distributional scenario, where the data generating mechanism is invariant across the label-conditional feature distributions.
This allows us to leverage a causal data inflation procedure to enlarge the representation of minority classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-25T00:13:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.