Am I Productive? Exploring the Experience of Remote Workers with Task Management Tools

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06816v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 09:41:46 GMT
• Title: Am I Productive? Exploring the Experience of Remote Workers with Task Management Tools
• Authors: Russell Beale,
• Abstract summary: This study investigated the productivity needs and challenges of remote knowledge workers and how they use Task Management tools.<n>Using a digital Task Management application made no significant difference to using pen and paper for improving perceived productivity of remote workers.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: As the world continues to change, more and more knowledge workers are embracing remote work. Yet this comes with its challenges for their productivity, and while many Task Management applications promise to improve the productivity of remote workers, it remains unclear how effective they are. Based on existing frameworks, this study investigated the productivity needs and challenges of remote knowledge workers and how they use Task Management tools. The research was conducted through a 2-week long, mixed-methods diary study and semi-structured interview. Perceptions of productivity, task management tool use and productivity challenges were observed. The findings show that using a digital Task Management application made no significant difference to using pen and paper for improving perceived productivity of remote workers and discuss the need for better personalization of Task Management applications.

Related papers

• Data-Efficient Multitask DAgger [15.497645748861913]
  Generalist robot policies that can perform many tasks typically require extensive expert data or simulations for training.<n>We propose a novel Data-Efficient multitask DAgger framework that distills a single multitask policy from multiple task-specific expert policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T20:17:35Z)
• Prompt Engineering and the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Enhancing Human Productivity [0.0]
  This paper investigates how the structure and clarity of user prompts impact the effectiveness and productivity of large language models (LLMs)<n>The results show that users who employ clear, structured, and context-aware prompts report higher task efficiency and better outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T18:27:03Z)
• Time Warp: The Gap Between Developers' Ideal vs Actual Workweeks in an AI-Driven Era [8.811930702380115]
  We present the findings from a survey of 484 software developers at Microsoft.<n>Our analysis reveals significant deviations between a developer's ideal workweek and their actual workweek.<n>Given the growing adoption of AI tools in software engineering, we identify specific tasks and areas that could be strong candidates for automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T08:29:49Z)
• From User Surveys to Telemetry-Driven AI Agents: Exploring the Potential of Personalized Productivity Solutions [21.79433247723466]
  Information workers increasingly struggle with productivity challenges in modern workplaces.<n>Despite availability of productivity metrics through enterprise tools, workers often fail to translate this data into actionable insights.<n>We present a comprehensive, user-centric approach to address these challenges through AI-based productivity agents tailored to users' needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T04:20:10Z)
• Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks. We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z)
• Task Compass: Scaling Multi-task Pre-training with Task Prefix [122.49242976184617]
  Existing studies show that multi-task learning with large-scale supervised tasks suffers from negative effects across tasks. We propose a task prefix guided multi-task pre-training framework to explore the relationships among tasks. Our model can not only serve as the strong foundation backbone for a wide range of tasks but also be feasible as a probing tool for analyzing task relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T15:02:04Z)
• Skill-based Meta-Reinforcement Learning [65.31995608339962]
  We devise a method that enables meta-learning on long-horizon, sparse-reward tasks. Our core idea is to leverage prior experience extracted from offline datasets during meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T17:58:19Z)
• Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learning [55.80489920205404]
  Multi-task learning can leverage information learned by one task to benefit the training of other tasks. We suggest an approach to select which tasks should train together in multi-task learning models. Our method determines task groupings in a single training run by co-training all tasks together and quantifying the effect to which one task's gradient would affect another task's loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T02:01:43Z)
• Discovering Generalizable Skills via Automated Generation of Diverse Tasks [82.16392072211337]
  We propose a method to discover generalizable skills via automated generation of a diverse set of tasks. As opposed to prior work on unsupervised discovery of skills, our method pairs each skill with a unique task produced by a trainable task generator. A task discriminator defined on the robot behaviors in the generated tasks is jointly trained to estimate the evidence lower bound of the diversity objective. The learned skills can then be composed in a hierarchical reinforcement learning algorithm to solve unseen target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T03:41:51Z)
• Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings [21.069970719766214]
  In-meeting multitasking is closely linked to people's productivity and wellbeing. We present what we believe is the most comprehensive study of remote meeting multitasking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T08:33:23Z)
• Scalable Multi-Task Imitation Learning with Autonomous Improvement [159.9406205002599]
  We build an imitation learning system that can continuously improve through autonomous data collection. We leverage the robot's own trials as demonstrations for tasks other than the one that the robot actually attempted. In contrast to prior imitation learning approaches, our method can autonomously collect data with sparse supervision for continuous improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T18:56:42Z)
• Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learning [119.675492088251]
  Multi-task learning has emerged as a promising approach for sharing structure across multiple tasks. The reasons why multi-task learning is so challenging compared to single-task learning are not fully understood. We propose a form of gradient surgery that projects a task's gradient onto the normal plane of the gradient of any other task that has a conflicting gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-19T06:33:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.