Assessing Large Language Models for Structured Medical Order Extraction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10475v1
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 06:56:10 GMT
- Title: Assessing Large Language Models for Structured Medical Order Extraction
- Authors: A H M Rezaul Karim, Ozlem Uzuner,
- Abstract summary: The MEDIQA-OE 2025 shared task focuses on extracting structured medical orders from extended conversational transcripts.<n>We present the Mason submission, which ranked 5th among 17 participating teams with 105 total submissions.<n>This few-shot configuration achieved an average F1 score of 37.76, with notable improvements in reason and provenance accuracy.
- Score: 0.6015898117103068
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Medical order extraction is essential for structuring actionable clinical information, supporting decision-making, and enabling downstream applications such as documentation and workflow automation. Orders may be embedded in diverse sources, including electronic health records, discharge summaries, and multi-turn doctor-patient dialogues, and can span categories such as medications, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and follow-up actions. The MEDIQA-OE 2025 shared task focuses on extracting structured medical orders from extended conversational transcripts, requiring the identification of order type, description, reason, and provenance. We present the MasonNLP submission, which ranked 5th among 17 participating teams with 105 total submissions. Our approach uses a general-purpose, instruction-tuned LLaMA-4 17B model without domain-specific fine-tuning, guided by a single in-context example. This few-shot configuration achieved an average F1 score of 37.76, with notable improvements in reason and provenance accuracy. These results demonstrate that large, non-domain-specific LLMs, when paired with effective prompt engineering, can serve as strong, scalable baselines for specialized clinical NLP tasks.
Related papers
- Intelligent Documentation in Medical Education: Can AI Replace Manual Case Logging? [1.3266402517619373]
Procedural case logs are a core requirement in radiology training, yet they are time-consuming to complete and prone to inconsistency when authored manually.<n>This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can automate procedural case log documentation directly from free-text radiology reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T01:45:51Z) - CNSight: Evaluation of Clinical Note Segmentation Tools [3.673249612734457]
We evaluate rule-based baselines, domain-specific transformer models, and large language models for clinical note segmentation using a curated dataset of 1,000 notes from MIMIC-IV.<n>Our experiments show that large API-based models achieve the best overall performance, with GPT-5-mini reaching a best average F1 of 72.4 across sentence-level and freetext segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-28T05:40:15Z) - Enabling Doctor-Centric Medical AI with LLMs through Workflow-Aligned Tasks and Benchmarks [72.89088985703748]
The rise of large language models (LLMs) has transformed healthcare by offering clinical guidance, yet their direct deployment to patients poses safety risks.<n>We propose repositioning LLMs as clinical assistants that collaborate with experienced physicians rather than interacting with patients directly.<n>We construct DoctorFLAN, a large-scale Chinese medical dataset comprising 92,000 Q&A instances across 22 clinical tasks and 27 specialties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T06:18:27Z) - Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Large Language Models for Medical VQA [0.6015898117103068]
Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) enables natural language queries over medical images to support clinical decision-making and patient care.<n>We present the MasonNLP system, which employs a general-domain, instruction-tuned large language model with a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework.<n>Best-performing system ranked 3rd among 19 teams and 51 submissions with an average score of 41.37%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-12T07:03:58Z) - MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book [5.318470975871017]
We present MedBookVQA, a systematic and comprehensive multimodal benchmark derived from open-access medical textbooks.<n>We generate 5,000 clinically relevant questions spanning modality recognition, classification, anatomical identification, symptom diagnosis, and surgical procedures.<n>We evaluate a wide array of MLLMs, including proprietary, open-sourced, medical, and reasoning models, revealing significant performance disparities across task types and model categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-01T06:28:36Z) - MedGUIDE: Benchmarking Clinical Decision-Making in Large Language Models [10.46932473088646]
We introduce MedGUIDE, a new benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to make guideline-consistent clinical decisions.<n> MedGUIDE is constructed from 55 curated NCCN decision trees across 17 cancer types.<n>We apply a two-stage quality selection process, combining expert-labeled reward models and LLM-as-a-judge ensembles across ten clinical and linguistic criteria, to select 7,747 high-quality samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T18:21:52Z) - Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts.
MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation.
MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z) - GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals.
GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date.
It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z) - Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark [63.21278434331952]
We build a benchmark ClinicBench to better understand large language models (LLMs) in the clinic.
We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks.
We then construct six novel datasets and clinical tasks that are complex but common in real-world practice.
We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T15:51:06Z) - Med-MoE: Mixture of Domain-Specific Experts for Lightweight Medical Vision-Language Models [17.643421997037514]
We propose a novel framework that tackles both discriminative and generative multimodal medical tasks.
The learning of Med-MoE consists of three steps: multimodal medical alignment, instruction tuning and routing, and domain-specific MoE tuning.
Our model can achieve performance superior to or on par with state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T02:35:17Z) - PMC-LLaMA: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Medicine [62.39105735933138]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding.
LLMs struggle in domains that require precision, such as medical applications, due to their lack of domain-specific knowledge.
We describe the procedure for building a powerful, open-source language model specifically designed for medicine applications, termed as PMC-LLaMA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-27T18:29:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.