Evaluating the effects of preprocessing, method selection, and hyperparameter tuning on SAR-based flood mapping and water depth estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11305v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 11:54:42 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the effects of preprocessing, method selection, and hyperparameter tuning on SAR-based flood mapping and water depth estimation
• Authors: Jean-Paul Travert, Cédric Goeury, Sébastien Boyaval, Vito Bacchi, Fabrice Zaoui,
• Abstract summary: The evaluation is conducted for two flood events on the Garonne River (France) in 2019 and 2021.<n>The choice of speckle filter alters flood extent estimations with variations of several square kilometers.<n>The selection and tuning of flood mapping methods also affect performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Flood mapping and water depth estimation from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery are crucial for calibrating and validating hydraulic models. This study uses SAR imagery to evaluate various preprocessing (especially speckle noise reduction), flood mapping, and water depth estimation methods. The impact of the choice of method at different steps and its hyperparameters is studied by considering an ensemble of preprocessed images, flood maps, and water depth fields. The evaluation is conducted for two flood events on the Garonne River (France) in 2019 and 2021, using hydrodynamic simulations and in-situ observations as reference data. Results show that the choice of speckle filter alters flood extent estimations with variations of several square kilometers. Furthermore, the selection and tuning of flood mapping methods also affect performance. While supervised methods outperformed unsupervised ones, tuned unsupervised approaches (such as local thresholding or change detection) can achieve comparable results. The compounded uncertainty from preprocessing and flood mapping steps also introduces high variability in the water depth field estimates. This study highlights the importance of considering the entire processing pipeline, encompassing preprocessing, flood mapping, and water depth estimation methods and their associated hyperparameters. Rather than relying on a single configuration, adopting an ensemble approach and accounting for methodological uncertainty should be privileged. For flood mapping, the method choice has the most influence. For water depth estimation, the most influential processing step was the flood map input resulting from the flood mapping step and the hyperparameters of the methods.

Related papers

• A physics-guided neural network for flooding area detection using SAR imagery and local river gauge observations [0.0]
  We propose a physics-guided neural network for flooding area detection. Our approach takes as input data the Sentinel 1 time-series images and the water elevations in the river assigned to each image. The effectiveness of our method is evaluated in five different study areas by comparing the predicted water maps with reference water maps obtained from digital terrain models and optical satellite images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T14:13:06Z)
• ScaleDepth: Decomposing Metric Depth Estimation into Scale Prediction and Relative Depth Estimation [62.600382533322325]
  We propose a novel monocular depth estimation method called ScaleDepth. Our method decomposes metric depth into scene scale and relative depth, and predicts them through a semantic-aware scale prediction module. Our method achieves metric depth estimation for both indoor and outdoor scenes in a unified framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T05:11:56Z)
• Automated Floodwater Depth Estimation Using Large Multimodal Model for Rapid Flood Mapping [0.0]
  This paper presents an automated and fast approach for estimating floodwater depth from on-site flood photos. A pre-trained large multimodal model, GPT-4 Vision, was used specifically for estimating floodwater. Results show that the proposed approach can rapidly provide a consistent and reliable estimation of floodwater depth from flood photos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:02:15Z)
• Bayesian inversion of GPR waveforms for sub-surface material characterization: an uncertainty-aware retrieval of soil moisture and overlaying biomass properties [0.7874708385247353]
  estimation of properties of overlaying layer is crucial for applications like wildfire risk assessment. This study proposes a Bayesian model-updating-based approach for ground penetrating radar (GPR) waveform to predict moisture contents and depths of soil and overlaying material layer. The proposed method provides a promising approach for uncertainty-aware sub-surface parameter estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T06:54:30Z)
• Rapid Flood Inundation Forecast Using Fourier Neural Operator [77.30160833875513]
  Flood inundation forecast provides critical information for emergency planning before and during flood events. High-resolution hydrodynamic modeling has become more accessible in recent years, however, predicting flood extents at the street and building levels in real-time is still computationally demanding. We present a hybrid process-based and data-driven machine learning (ML) approach for flood extent and inundation depth prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-29T22:49:50Z)
• DeepAqua: Self-Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Wetland Surface Water Extent with SAR Images using Knowledge Distillation [44.99833362998488]
  We present DeepAqua, a self-supervised deep learning model that eliminates the need for manual annotations during the training phase. We exploit cases where optical- and radar-based water masks coincide, enabling the detection of both open and vegetated water surfaces. Experimental results show that DeepAqua outperforms other unsupervised methods by improving accuracy by 7%, Intersection Over Union by 27%, and F1 score by 14%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T18:06:21Z)
• An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods [59.31940764426359]
  We compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth at high spatial resolution. Deep learning models are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T16:08:54Z)
• Unpaired Overwater Image Defogging Using Prior Map Guided CycleGAN [60.257791714663725]
  We propose a Prior map Guided CycleGAN (PG-CycleGAN) for defogging of images with overwater scenes. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised defogging approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-23T03:00:28Z)
• Experimental study of time series forecasting methods for groundwater level prediction [0.0]
  We created a dataset of 1026 groundwater level time series. Each time series is made of daily measurements of groundwater levels and two variables, rainfall and evapotranspiration. We compared different predictors including local and global time series forecasting methods. Our result analysis shows that the best predictions are obtained by training a global method on past groundwater levels and rainfall data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T08:58:55Z)
• Application of Deep Learning-based Interpolation Methods to Nearshore Bathymetry [0.82354995224692]
  We present several deep learning-based techniques to estimate nearshore bathymetry with sparse, multi-scale measurements. We propose a Deep Neural Network (DNN) to compute posterior estimates of the nearshore bathymetry, as well as a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) that samples from the posterior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T08:22:00Z)
• On Signal-to-Noise Ratio Issues in Variational Inference for Deep Gaussian Processes [55.62520135103578]
  We show that the gradient estimates used in training Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) with importance-weighted variational inference are susceptible to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) issues. We show that our fix can lead to consistent improvements in the predictive performance of DGP models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T14:38:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.