PACEbench: A Framework for Evaluating Practical AI Cyber-Exploitation Capabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11688v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:50:25 GMT
• Title: PACEbench: A Framework for Evaluating Practical AI Cyber-Exploitation Capabilities
• Abstract summary: We introduce PACEbench, a practical AI cyber-exploitation benchmark.<n>PACEbench comprises four scenarios spanning single, blended, chained, and defense vulnerability exploitations.<n>We propose PACEagent, a novel agent that emulates human penetration testers by supporting multi-phase reconnaissance, analysis, and exploitation.
• Score: 42.61805002268063
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The increasing autonomy of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates a rigorous evaluation of their potential to aid in cyber offense. Existing benchmarks often lack real-world complexity and are thus unable to accurately assess LLMs' cybersecurity capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce PACEbench, a practical AI cyber-exploitation benchmark built on the principles of realistic vulnerability difficulty, environmental complexity, and cyber defenses. Specifically, PACEbench comprises four scenarios spanning single, blended, chained, and defense vulnerability exploitations. To handle these complex challenges, we propose PACEagent, a novel agent that emulates human penetration testers by supporting multi-phase reconnaissance, analysis, and exploitation. Extensive experiments with seven frontier LLMs demonstrate that current models struggle with complex cyber scenarios, and none can bypass defenses. These findings suggest that current models do not yet pose a generalized cyber offense threat. Nonetheless, our work provides a robust benchmark to guide the trustworthy development of future models.

Related papers

• CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilities [66.48570184296857]
  CyberGym-E2E is a large-scale and realistic end-to-end cybersecurity benchmark.<n>It comprehensively evaluates AI agents' abilities across the full lifecycle of vulnerability discovery, PoC generation, and patch generation.<n>The benchmark consists of 920 real-world vulnerabilities across 139 different open-source projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T05:06:37Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• PropensityBench: Evaluating Latent Safety Risks in Large Language Models via an Agentic Approach [49.14349403242654]
  We present $textbfPropensityBench$, a novel benchmark framework that assesses the proclivity of models to engage in risky behaviors.<n>Our framework includes 5,874 scenarios with 6,648 tools spanning four high-risk domains: cybersecurity, self-proliferation, biosecurity, and chemical security.<n>Across open-source and proprietary frontier models, we uncover 9 alarming signs of propensity: models frequently choose high-risk tools when under pressure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T18:46:44Z)
• CyberSOCEval: Benchmarking LLMs Capabilities for Malware Analysis and Threat Intelligence Reasoning [1.3863707631653515]
  Cyber defenders are overwhelmed by a deluge of security alerts, threat intelligence signals, and shifting business context.<n>Existing evaluations do not fully assess the scenarios most relevant to real-world defenders.<n>We introduce CyberSOCEval, a new suite of open source benchmarks within CyberSecEval 4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T14:33:07Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z)
• MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
  Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z)
• A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI [11.595840449117052]
  This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations.<n>We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes.<n>We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T23:05:02Z)
• Why Are Web AI Agents More Vulnerable Than Standalone LLMs? A Security Analysis [47.34614558636679]
  This study investigates the underlying factors that contribute to the increased vulnerability of Web AI agents.<n>We identify three critical factors that amplify the vulnerability of Web AI agents; (1) embedding user goals into the system prompt, (2) multi-step action generation, and (3) observational capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T18:56:26Z)
• OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilities [0.0]
  We demonstrate a new approach to assessing AI's progress towards enabling and scaling real-world offensive cyber operations.<n>We detail OCCULT, a lightweight operational evaluation framework that allows cyber security experts to contribute to rigorous and repeatable measurement.<n>We find that there has been significant recent advancement in the risks of AI being used to scale realistic cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T19:33:14Z)
• Countering Autonomous Cyber Threats [40.00865970939829]
  Foundation Models present dual-use concerns broadly and within the cyber domain specifically. Recent research has shown the potential for these advanced models to inform or independently execute offensive cyberspace operations. This work evaluates several state-of-the-art FMs on their ability to compromise machines in an isolated network and investigates defensive mechanisms to defeat such AI-powered attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T22:46:44Z)
• Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilities [1.1359551336076306]
  We introduce the Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB), a framework designed to rigorously assess the real-world offensive capabilities of LLM agents. Our evaluation of modern LLMs on 3CB reveals that frontier models, such as GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, can perform offensive tasks such as reconnaissance and exploitation. Our software solution and the corresponding benchmark provides a critical tool to reduce the gap between rapidly improving capabilities and robustness of cyber offense evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:06:48Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.