Learning-To-Measure: In-context Active Feature Acquisition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12624v1
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:23:32 GMT
- Title: Learning-To-Measure: In-context Active Feature Acquisition
- Authors: Yuta Kobayashi, Zilin Jing, Jiayu Yao, Hongseok Namkoong, Shalmali Joshi,
- Abstract summary: We formalize the meta-AFA problem, where the goal is to learn acquisition policies across various tasks.<n>We introduce Learning-to-Measure (L2M), which consists of i) reliable uncertainty quantification over unseen tasks, and ii) an uncertainty-guided greedy feature acquisition agent.<n>L2M operates directly on datasets with retrospective missingness and performs the meta-AFA task in-context, eliminating per-task retraining.
- Score: 10.604433053831405
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Active feature acquisition (AFA) is a sequential decision-making problem where the goal is to improve model performance for test instances by adaptively selecting which features to acquire. In practice, AFA methods often learn from retrospective data with systematic missingness in the features and limited task-specific labels. Most prior work addresses acquisition for a single predetermined task, limiting scalability. To address this limitation, we formalize the meta-AFA problem, where the goal is to learn acquisition policies across various tasks. We introduce Learning-to-Measure (L2M), which consists of i) reliable uncertainty quantification over unseen tasks, and ii) an uncertainty-guided greedy feature acquisition agent that maximizes conditional mutual information. We demonstrate a sequence-modeling or autoregressive pre-training approach that underpins reliable uncertainty quantification for tasks with arbitrary missingness. L2M operates directly on datasets with retrospective missingness and performs the meta-AFA task in-context, eliminating per-task retraining. Across synthetic and real-world tabular benchmarks, L2M matches or surpasses task-specific baselines, particularly under scarce labels and high missingness.
Related papers
- Task Prototype-Based Knowledge Retrieval for Multi-Task Learning from Partially Annotated Data [38.55691652000724]
Multi-task learning (MTL) is critical in real-world applications such as autonomous driving and robotics.<n>Existing methods for partially labeled MTL typically rely on predictions from unlabeled tasks.<n>We propose a prototype-based knowledge retrieval framework that achieves robust MTL instead of relying on predictions from unlabeled tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T12:27:02Z) - Dynamic Routing Between Experts: A Data-Efficient Approach to Continual Learning in Vision-Language Models [10.431923437214719]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) suffer from catastrophic forgetting when sequentially fine-tuned on new tasks.<n>We introduce a routing-based approach that enables the integration of new tasks while preserving the foundational knowledge acquired during pretraining.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T18:39:32Z) - BOTS: A Unified Framework for Bayesian Online Task Selection in LLM Reinforcement Finetuning [82.925106913459]
Reinforcement finetuning (RFT) is a key technique for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences and enhancing reasoning.<n>We introduce BOTS, a unified framework for Bayesian Online Task Selection in RFT reinforcement finetuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T11:15:23Z) - Stochastic Encodings for Active Feature Acquisition [100.47043816019888]
Active Feature Acquisition is an instance-wise, sequential decision making problem.<n>The aim is to dynamically select which feature to measure based on current observations, independently for each test instance.<n>Common approaches either use Reinforcement Learning, which experiences training difficulties, or greedily maximize the conditional mutual information of the label and unobserved features, which makes myopic.<n>We introduce a latent variable model, trained in a supervised manner. Acquisitions are made by reasoning about the features across many possible unobserved realizations in a latent space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-03T23:48:46Z) - CKAA: Cross-subspace Knowledge Alignment and Aggregation for Robust Continual Learning [80.18781219542016]
Continual Learning (CL) empowers AI models to continuously learn from sequential task streams.<n>Recent parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT)-based CL methods have garnered increasing attention due to their superior performance.<n>We propose Cross-subspace Knowledge Alignment and Aggregation (CKAA) to enhance robustness against misleading task-ids.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-13T03:11:35Z) - Learning Task Representations from In-Context Learning [73.72066284711462]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in in-context learning.<n>We introduce an automated formulation for encoding task information in ICL prompts as a function of attention heads.<n>We show that our method's effectiveness stems from aligning the distribution of the last hidden state with that of an optimally performing in-context-learned model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T00:16:44Z) - Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data.
For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z) - TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large
Language Models [52.734140807634624]
Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety.
Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs.
We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z) - Towards Robust Continual Learning with Bayesian Adaptive Moment Regularization [51.34904967046097]
Continual learning seeks to overcome the challenge of catastrophic forgetting, where a model forgets previously learnt information.
We introduce a novel prior-based method that better constrains parameter growth, reducing catastrophic forgetting.
Results show that BAdam achieves state-of-the-art performance for prior-based methods on challenging single-headed class-incremental experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T17:10:51Z) - Learning to generate imaginary tasks for improving generalization in
meta-learning [12.635773307074022]
The success of meta-learning on existing benchmarks is predicated on the assumption that the distribution of meta-training tasks covers meta-testing tasks.
Recent solutions have pursued augmentation of meta-training tasks, while it is still an open question to generate both correct and sufficiently imaginary tasks.
In this paper, we seek an approach that up-samples meta-training tasks from the task representation via a task up-sampling network. Besides, the resulting approach named Adversarial Task Up-sampling (ATU) suffices to generate tasks that can maximally contribute to the latest meta-learner by maximizing an adversarial loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T08:21:05Z) - Task-Agnostic Continual Reinforcement Learning: Gaining Insights and
Overcoming Challenges [27.474011433615317]
Continual learning (CL) enables the development of models and agents that learn from a sequence of tasks.
We investigate the factors that contribute to the performance differences between task-agnostic CL and multi-task (MTL) agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-28T17:59:00Z) - Conditional Channel Gated Networks for Task-Aware Continual Learning [44.894710899300435]
Convolutional Neural Networks experience catastrophic forgetting when optimized on a sequence of learning problems.
We introduce a novel framework to tackle this problem with conditional computation.
We validate our proposal on four continual learning datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-31T19:35:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.