Modeling Political Discourse with Sentence-BERT and BERTopic

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22904v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:19:42 GMT
• Title: Modeling Political Discourse with Sentence-BERT and BERTopic
• Authors: Margarida Mendonca, Alvaro Figueira,
• Abstract summary: We analyze the longevity and moral dimensions of political topics in Twitter activity during the 117th U.S. Congress.<n>Our findings reveal that while overarching themes remain stable, granular topics tend to dissolve rapidly.<n>Moral foundations play a critical role in topic longevity, with Care and Loyalty dominating durable topics, while partisan differences manifest in distinct moral framing strategies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media has reshaped political discourse, offering politicians a platform for direct engagement while reinforcing polarization and ideological divides. This study introduces a novel topic evolution framework that integrates BERTopic-based topic modeling with Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) to analyze the longevity and moral dimensions of political topics in Twitter activity during the 117th U.S. Congress. We propose a methodology for tracking dynamic topic shifts over time and measuring their association with moral values and quantifying topic persistence. Our findings reveal that while overarching themes remain stable, granular topics tend to dissolve rapidly, limiting their long-term influence. Moreover, moral foundations play a critical role in topic longevity, with Care and Loyalty dominating durable topics, while partisan differences manifest in distinct moral framing strategies. This work contributes to the field of social network analysis and computational political discourse by offering a scalable, interpretable approach to understanding moral-driven topic evolution on social media.

Related papers

• Motivation, Attention, and Visual Platform Design: How Moral Contagions Spread on TikTok and Instagram in the 2024 United States Presidential Election [0.9883261192383612]
  We analyze 2,027,595 TikToks and 1,126,972 Instagram posts during the 2024 US presidential election.<n>Using temporal supply-demand analysis and moral foundations scoring, we examine the dynamics of key electoral issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:55:27Z)
• Moral Lenses, Political Coordinates: Towards Ideological Positioning of Morally Conditioned LLMs [24.838782340535843]
  We investigate the causal relationship between moral values and political positioning by treating moral orientation as a controllable condition.<n>By treating moral values as lenses, we observe how moral conditioning actively steers model trajectories across economic and social dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T15:09:34Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Unveiling Political Influence Through Social Media: Network and Causal Dynamics in the 2022 French Presidential Election [0.0]
  During the 2022 French presidential election, we collected daily Twitter messages on key topics posted by political candidates and their close networks.<n>Using a data-driven approach, we analyze interactions among political parties, identifying central topics that shape the landscape of political debate.<n>Our findings demonstrate how specific issues, such as health and foreign policy, act as catalysts for cross-party influence, particularly during critical election phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T16:35:02Z)
• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.<n>Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.<n>We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• A Structural Text-Based Scaling Model for Analyzing Political Discourse [0.0]
  We introduce the Structural Text-Based Scaling model to infer ideological positions of speakers for latent topics from text data. Applying STBS to U.S. Senate speeches, we identify immigration and gun violence as the most polarizing topics between the two major parties in Congress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T14:05:35Z)
• MOTIV: Visual Exploration of Moral Framing in Social Media [9.314312944316962]
  We present a visual computing framework for analyzing moral rhetoric on social media around controversial topics. We propose a methodology for deconstructing and visualizing the textitwhen, textitwhere, and textitwho behind each of these moral dimensions as expressed in microblog data. Our results indicate that this visual approach supports rapid, collaborative hypothesis testing, and can help give insights into the underlying moral values behind controversial political issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T16:11:58Z)
• Recent Advances in Hate Speech Moderation: Multimodality and the Role of Large Models [52.24001776263608]
  This comprehensive survey delves into the recent strides in HS moderation. We highlight the burgeoning role of large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) We identify existing gaps in research, particularly in the context of underrepresented languages and cultures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T03:51:44Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
  Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media. They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting. Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z)
• Capturing Stance Dynamics in Social Media: Open Challenges and Research Directions [6.531659195805749]
  Social media platforms provide a goldmine for mining public opinion on issues of wide societal interest. Opinion mining is a problem that can be operationalised by capturing and aggregating the stance of individual social media posts. We investigate the intersection between computational linguistics and the temporal evolution of human communication in digital media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T16:28:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.