The Formalism-Implementation Gap in Reinforcement Learning Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16175v2
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:06:41 GMT
- Title: The Formalism-Implementation Gap in Reinforcement Learning Research
- Authors: Pablo Samuel Castro,
- Abstract summary: This paper argues that reinforcement learning research should stop focusing solely on demonstrating agent capabilities.<n>It argues that we need to be more precise on how our benchmarks map to the underlying mathematical formalisms.
- Score: 17.922282609849184
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The last decade has seen an upswing in interest and adoption of reinforcement learning (RL) techniques, in large part due to its demonstrated capabilities at performing certain tasks at "super-human levels". This has incentivized the community to prioritize research that demonstrates RL agent performance, often at the expense of research aimed at understanding their learning dynamics. Performance-focused research runs the risk of overfitting on academic benchmarks -- thereby rendering them less useful -- which can make it difficult to transfer proposed techniques to novel problems. Further, it implicitly diminishes work that does not push the performance-frontier, but aims at improving our understanding of these techniques. This paper argues two points: (i) RL research should stop focusing solely on demonstrating agent capabilities, and focus more on advancing the science and understanding of reinforcement learning; and (ii) we need to be more precise on how our benchmarks map to the underlying mathematical formalisms. We use the popular Arcade Learning Environment (ALE; Bellemare et al., 2013) as an example of a benchmark that, despite being increasingly considered "saturated", can be effectively used for developing this understanding, and facilitating the deployment of RL techniques in impactful real-world problems.
Related papers
- Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Agentic Reasoning [90.3737088727791]
We conduct a comprehensive and systematic investigation to demystify reinforcement learning in agentic reasoning.<n>We highlight our key insights: (i) replacing stitched synthetic trajectories with real end-to-end tool-use trajectories yields a far stronger SFT.<n> Exploration-friendly techniques are crucial for agentic RL, such as clip higher, overlong reward shaping, and maintaining adequate policy entropy could improve the training efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T17:57:15Z) - Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning [56.496001894673235]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective at enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that puzzling phenomena like aha moments", length-scaling'' and entropy dynamics are not disparate occurrences but hallmarks of an emergent reasoning hierarchy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-03T18:52:49Z) - Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z) - Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [82.43575191712726]
We introduce a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the impact ofReinforcement learning on reasoning.<n>Our framework specifically investigates key elements that have been hypothesized to benefit from RL training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z) - Improving RL Exploration for LLM Reasoning through Retrospective Replay [45.00643118030677]
We propose a novel algorithm named Retrospective Replay-based Reinforcement Learning (RRL), which introduces a dynamic replay mechanism throughout the training process.<n>RRL enables the model to revisit promising states identified in the early stages, thereby improving its efficiency and effectiveness in exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-19T17:40:04Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - A Survey On Enhancing Reinforcement Learning in Complex Environments: Insights from Human and LLM Feedback [1.0359008237358598]
This paper focuses on problems of two-folds: firstly, we focus on humans or an LLMs assistance, investigating the ways in which these entities may collaborate with the RL agent in order to foster optimal behavior and expedite learning; secondly, we delve into the research papers dedicated to addressing the intricacies of environments characterized by large observation space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T15:52:03Z) - Reinforcement Learning-assisted Evolutionary Algorithm: A Survey and
Research Opportunities [63.258517066104446]
Reinforcement learning integrated as a component in the evolutionary algorithm has demonstrated superior performance in recent years.
We discuss the RL-EA integration method, the RL-assisted strategy adopted by RL-EA, and its applications according to the existing literature.
In the applications of RL-EA section, we also demonstrate the excellent performance of RL-EA on several benchmarks and a range of public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T15:06:05Z) - Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [31.112066295496003]
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a machine learning approach that trains agents to maximize cumulative rewards through interactions with environments.
This article presents a comprehensive survey of state-of-the-art methods for integrating EC into RL, referred to as evolutionary reinforcement learning (EvoRL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T01:38:42Z) - An information-theoretic perspective on intrinsic motivation in
reinforcement learning: a survey [0.0]
We propose to survey these research works through a new taxonomy based on information theory.
We computationally revisit the notions of surprise, novelty and skill learning.
Our analysis suggests that novelty and surprise can assist the building of a hierarchy of transferable skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-19T09:47:43Z) - Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practice [9.783469272270896]
We provide an extensive overview of fairness approaches that have been implemented via a reinforcement learning (RL) framework.
We discuss various practical applications in which RL methods have been applied to achieve a fair solution with high accuracy.
We highlight a few major issues to explore in order to advance the field of fair-RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T09:07:28Z) - Autonomous Reinforcement Learning: Formalism and Benchmarking [106.25788536376007]
Real-world embodied learning, such as that performed by humans and animals, is situated in a continual, non-episodic world.
Common benchmark tasks in RL are episodic, with the environment resetting between trials to provide the agent with multiple attempts.
This discrepancy presents a major challenge when attempting to take RL algorithms developed for episodic simulated environments and run them on real-world platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-17T16:28:06Z) - Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives [69.48324517535549]
We aim to provide a literature review of different formulations and approaches to continual reinforcement learning (RL)
While still in its early days, the study of continual RL has the promise to develop better incremental reinforcement learners.
These include applications such as those in the fields of healthcare, education, logistics, and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-25T02:35:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.