Correlation of divergency: c-delta. Being different in a similar way or not
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16717v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:01:35 GMT
- Title: Correlation of divergency: c-delta. Being different in a similar way or not
- Abstract summary: c-delta is a custom statistical measure designed to quantify the similarity of internal divergence patterns between two groups of values.<n>It is particularly useful for benchmarking, clustering validation, and assessing the similarity of variability structures.
- Score: 1.2691047660244335
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper introduces the correlation-of-divergency coefficient, c-delta, a custom statistical measure designed to quantify the similarity of internal divergence patterns between two groups of values. Unlike conventional correlation coefficients such as Pearson or Spearman, which assess the association between paired values, c-delta evaluates whether the way values differ within one group is mirrored in another. The method involves calculating, for each value, its divergence from all other values in its group, and then comparing these patterns across the two groups (e.g., human vs machine intelligence). The coefficient is normalised by the average root mean square divergence within each group, ensuring scale invariance. Potential applications of c-delta span quantum physics, where it can compare the spread of measurement outcomes between quantum systems, as well as fields such as genetics, ecology, psychometrics, manufacturing, machine learning, and social network analysis. The measure is particularly useful for benchmarking, clustering validation, and assessing the similarity of variability structures. While c-delta is not bounded between -1 and 1 and may be sensitive to outliers (but so is PMCC), it offers a new perspective for analysing internal variability and divergence. The article discusses the mathematical formulation, potential adaptations for complex data, and the interpretative considerations relevant to this alternative approach.
Related papers
- Efficient Covariance Estimation for Sparsified Functional Data [51.69796254617083]
proposed Random-knots (Random-knots-Spatial) and B-spline (Bspline-Spatial) estimators of the covariance function are computationally efficient.<n>Asymptotic pointwise of the covariance are obtained for sparsified individual trajectories under some regularity conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T00:50:33Z) - Evaluating Representational Similarity Measures from the Lens of Functional Correspondence [3.1883014716361635]
Neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) both face the challenge of interpreting high-dimensional neural data.<n>Despite the widespread use of representational comparisons, a critical question remains: which metrics are most suitable for these comparisons?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T23:53:58Z) - Revisiting Cosine Similarity via Normalized ICA-transformed Embeddings [2.8402080392117757]
Cosine similarity is widely used to measure the similarity between two embeddings.<n>We propose a novel interpretation of cosine similarity as the sum of semantic similarities over axes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T15:44:37Z) - Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles [69.18453821764075]
Machine-learned normalizing flows can be used in the context of lattice quantum field theory to generate statistically correlated ensembles of lattice gauge fields at different action parameters.
This work demonstrates how these correlations can be exploited for variance reduction in the computation of observables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T18:33:52Z) - TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood.
Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation.
We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean?
Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z) - On the Strong Correlation Between Model Invariance and Generalization [54.812786542023325]
Generalization captures a model's ability to classify unseen data.
Invariance measures consistency of model predictions on transformations of the data.
From a dataset-centric view, we find a certain model's accuracy and invariance linearly correlated on different test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T17:08:25Z) - Equivariance Discovery by Learned Parameter-Sharing [153.41877129746223]
We study how to discover interpretable equivariances from data.
Specifically, we formulate this discovery process as an optimization problem over a model's parameter-sharing schemes.
Also, we theoretically analyze the method for Gaussian data and provide a bound on the mean squared gap between the studied discovery scheme and the oracle scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-07T17:59:19Z) - Kernel distance measures for time series, random fields and other
structured data [71.61147615789537]
kdiff is a novel kernel-based measure for estimating distances between instances of structured data.
It accounts for both self and cross similarities across the instances and is defined using a lower quantile of the distance distribution.
Some theoretical results are provided for separability conditions using kdiff as a distance measure for clustering and classification problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-29T22:54:17Z) - Disentanglement Analysis with Partial Information Decomposition [31.56299813238937]
disentangled representations aim at reversing the process by mapping data to multiple random variables that individually capture distinct generative factors.
Current disentanglement metrics are designed to measure the concentration, e.g., absolute deviation, variance, or entropy, of each variable conditioned by each generative factor.
In this work, we use the Partial Information Decomposition framework to evaluate information sharing between more than two variables, and build a framework, including a new disentanglement metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-31T11:09:40Z) - Conditional canonical correlation estimation based on covariates with
random forests [0.0]
We propose a new method called Random Forest with Canonical Correlation Analysis (RFCCA) to estimate the conditional canonical correlations between two sets of variables.
The proposed method and the global significance test is evaluated through simulation studies that show it provides accurate canonical correlation estimations and well-controlled Type-1 error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-23T17:09:46Z) - Learning from Aggregate Observations [82.44304647051243]
We study the problem of learning from aggregate observations where supervision signals are given to sets of instances.
We present a general probabilistic framework that accommodates a variety of aggregate observations.
Simple maximum likelihood solutions can be applied to various differentiable models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-14T06:18:50Z) - Statistical and Topological Properties of Sliced Probability Divergences [30.258116496304662]
We derive various theoretical properties of sliced probability divergences.
We show that slicing preserves the metric axioms and the weak continuity of the divergence.
We then precise the results in the case where the base divergence belongs to the class of integral probability metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-12T13:15:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.