Is quantum mechanics merely a theory for us?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17471v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:13:56 GMT
- Title: Is quantum mechanics merely a theory for us?
- Authors: Peter W. Evans,
- Abstract summary: This paper develops an agent-centric account of measurement that treats the preferred-basis problem is fundamentally perspectival.<n>I argue that quantum mechanics is best understood as an idiosyncratically human description of interactions with the physical world.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper develops an agent-centric account of measurement that treats the preferred-basis problem is fundamentally perspectival. On this view, the system--apparatus--environment decomposition and the observables that are apt to become classically robust are determined by the physical constitution and epistemic constraints of an embodied class of agents. Decoherence then stabilises those agent-specified observables, yielding facts that are stable for us without positing an absolute, observer-independent basis. On this picture, `measurements' are public not because they are metaphysically privileged, but because agents like us share the relevant sensorimotor and operational structure. I motivate this account through a discussion of two recent no-go results for relational quantum mechanics (RQM) (Brukner,2021;Pienaar,2021), and a subsequent response (DiBiagio and Rovelli, 2022): my aim is not to defend RQM per se, but to refine the relational insight with a principled account of basis selection rooted in embodiment. I provide a phenomenological gloss, drawing on body-schema considerations, to argue that quantum mechanics is best understood as an idiosyncratically human description of interactions with the physical world -- a structurally constrained, agent-indexed framework within which classicality emerges.
Related papers
- A Dobrushin condition for quantum Markov chains: Rapid mixing and conditional mutual information at high temperature [17.858283119788357]
A central challenge in quantum physics is to understand the structural properties of many-body systems.<n>For classical systems, we have a unified perspective which connects structural properties of systems at thermal equilibrium to the Markov chain dynamics that mix to them.<n>We develop a general framework that brings the breadth and flexibility of the classical theory to quantum Gibbs states at high temperature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:54:41Z) - Uncertainty Principle from Operator Asymmetry [0.0]
We introduce a new class of uncertainty relations grounded in the resource theory of asymmetry.<n>This framework resolves a long-standing open problem in quantum information theory.<n>We demonstrate the practical power of our framework by deriving tighter quantum speed limits for the dynamics of nearly conserved quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T14:50:32Z) - Physical Observers and Quantum Reconstructions [0.0]
We argue that the observer retains only predictive information about the observed system.<n>Applying to a lower limit on energy dissipation, the principle leads directly to a compact predictive model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T11:37:54Z) - Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world?<n>Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality.<n>We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z) - Theory of the correlated quantum Zeno effect in a monitored qubit dimer [41.94295877935867]
We show how the competition between two measurement processes give rise to two distinct Quantum Zeno (QZ) regimes.<n>We develop a theory based on a Gutzwiller ansatz for the wavefunction that is able to capture the structure of the Hilbert phase diagram.<n>We show how the two QZ regimes are intimately connected to the topology of the flow of the underlying non-Hermitian Hamiltonian governing the no-click evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T19:44:48Z) - Agency Is Frame-Dependent [94.91580596320331]
Agency is a system's capacity to steer outcomes toward a goal.<n>We argue that agency is fundamentally frame-dependent.<n>We conclude that any basic science of agency requires frame-dependence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T08:34:57Z) - Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations [0.0]
In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms.
We provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to build a conceptual-operational bridge between formalism and quantum phenomena.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T10:17:49Z) - Relational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Relativism, and the Iteration of Relativity [0.0]
The idea that the dynamical properties of quantum systems are invariably relative to other systems has recently regained currency.
Are there absolute facts about the properties one system possesses relative to a specified reference, or is this again a relative matter, and so on?
I conclude with some reflections on the current state of play in perspectivist versions of RQM and quantum relativism more generally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T21:48:41Z) - Step-by-step derivation of the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics
(or from nondisturbing to quantum correlations by connecting incompatible
observables) [0.0]
This paper provides a step-by-step derivation of the quantum formalism.
It helps us to understand why this formalism is as it is.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T19:27:24Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators.
Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.