Towards a feminist understanding of digital platform work

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19450v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 10:27:45 GMT
• Title: Towards a feminist understanding of digital platform work
• Authors: Clara Punzi,
• Abstract summary: The rapid growth of the digital platform economy is transforming labor markets, offering new employment opportunities with promises of flexibility and accessibility.<n>However, these benefits often come at the expense of increased economic exploitation, occupational segregation, and deteriorating working conditions.<n>This study seeks to elucidate the complex nature of digital platform work by drawing on feminist theories that have historically scrutinized and contested the structures of power within society.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of the digital platform economy is transforming labor markets, offering new employment opportunities with promises of flexibility and accessibility. However, these benefits often come at the expense of increased economic exploitation, occupational segregation, and deteriorating working conditions. Research highlights that algorithmic management disproportionately impacts marginalized groups, reinforcing gendered and racial inequalities while deepening power imbalances within capitalist systems. This study seeks to elucidate the complex nature of digital platform work by drawing on feminist theories that have historically scrutinized and contested the structures of power within society, especially in the workplace. It presents a framework focused on four key dimensions to lay a foundation for future research: (i) precarity and exploitation, (ii) surveillance and control, (iii) blurring employment boundaries, and (iv) colonial legacies. It advocates for participatory research, transparency in platform governance, and structural changes to promote more equitable conditions for digital platform workers.

Related papers

• Gender and Digital Platform Work During Turbulent Times [0.0]
  This commentary explores how the platform economy shapes labour market responses during times of crisis.<n>It examines how digital labour platforms offer flexible work opportunities while also reinforcing existing inequalities.<n>The commentary calls for gender-responsive policies and new research to understand how digital infrastructures labour experiences across different crisis contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T22:17:34Z)
• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• Local Technological Access, Income Disparities, and Job-Seeking in the United States Since 2010 [0.0]
  This study examines how place-based technological factors, personal demographics, household characteristics, and education shape income levels and decisions to seek new employment.<n>Regression analyses reveal that educational attainment, marital status, and frequency of Internet usage strongly predict both wages and individuals' job-seeking intensity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T14:55:45Z)
• Content Moderation Futures [0.3384279376065155]
  This study examines the failures and possibilities of contemporary social media governance.<n>I argue that successful governance is undermined by the pursuit of technological novelty and rapid growth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T00:42:41Z)
• Thinking beyond Bias: Analyzing Multifaceted Impacts and Implications of AI on Gendered Labour [1.5839621757142595]
  This paper emphasizes the need to explore AIs broader impacts on gendered labor. We draw attention to how the AI industry as an integral component of the larger economic structure is transforming the nature of work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T20:09:53Z)
• Understanding the Factors Influencing Self-Managed Enterprises of Crowdworkers: A Comprehensive Review [49.623146117284115]
  This paper investigates the shift in crowdsourcing towards self-managed enterprises of crowdworkers (SMECs) It reviews the literature to understand the foundational aspects of this shift, focusing on identifying key factors that may explain the rise of SMECs. The study aims to guide future research and inform policy and platform development, emphasizing the importance of fair labor practices in this evolving landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T14:33:16Z)
• On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models [93.67389739906561]
  We focus on open foundation models, defined here as those with broadly available model weights. We identify five distinctive properties of open foundation models that lead to both their benefits and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:49:53Z)
• Fair Models in Credit: Intersectional Discrimination and the Amplification of Inequity [5.333582981327497]
  The authors demonstrate the impact of such algorithmic bias in the microfinance context. We find that in addition to legally protected characteristics, sensitive attributes such as single parent status and number of children can result in imbalanced harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T10:34:26Z)
• Social Diversity Reduces the Complexity and Cost of Fostering Fairness [63.70639083665108]
  We investigate the effects of interference mechanisms which assume incomplete information and flexible standards of fairness. We quantify the role of diversity and show how it reduces the need for information gathering. Our results indicate that diversity changes and opens up novel mechanisms available to institutions wishing to promote fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T21:58:35Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• A Bottom-Up End-User Intelligent Assistant Approach to Empower Gig Workers against AI Inequality [16.121867459980137]
  We argue that a bottom-up approach that empowers individual workers to access AI-enabled work planning support and share data among a group of workers is a practical way to bridge AI inequality in gig work under the current paradigm of privately owned platforms. This position paper articulates a set of research challenges, potential approaches, and community engagement opportunities, seeking to start a dialogue on this important research topic in the interdisciplinary CHIWORK community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T01:30:30Z)
• Young Adult Unemployment Through the Lens of Social Media: Italy as a case study [108.33144653708091]
  We employ survey data together with social media data to analyse personality, moral values, but also cultural elements of the young unemployed population in Italy. Our findings show that there are small but significant differences in personality and moral values, with the unemployed males to be less agreeable. Unemployed have a more collectivist point of view, valuing more in-group loyalty, authority, and purity foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T10:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.