Estonian Native Large Language Model Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21193v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:56:28 GMT
• Title: Estonian Native Large Language Model Benchmark
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs in Estonian, based on seven diverse datasets.<n>The datasets are all generated from native Estonian sources without using machine translation.<n>To assess the results, we employ both human evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge methods.
• Score: 6.193919591996934
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The availability of LLM benchmarks for the Estonian language is limited, and a comprehensive evaluation comparing the performance of different LLMs on Estonian tasks has yet to be conducted. We introduce a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs in Estonian, based on seven diverse datasets. These datasets assess general and domain-specific knowledge, understanding of Estonian grammar and vocabulary, summarization abilities, contextual comprehension, and more. The datasets are all generated from native Estonian sources without using machine translation. We compare the performance of base models, instruction-tuned open-source models, and commercial models. Our evaluation includes 6 base models and 26 instruction-tuned models. To assess the results, we employ both human evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge methods. Human evaluation scores showed moderate to high correlation with benchmark evaluations, depending on the dataset. Claude 3.7 Sonnet, used as an LLM judge, demonstrated strong alignment with human ratings, indicating that top-performing LLMs can effectively support the evaluation of Estonian-language models.

Related papers

• Classifying German Language Proficiency Levels Using Large Language Models [0.24683296459020942]
  This paper investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automatically classifying German texts into different proficiency levels.<n>To support robust training and evaluation, we construct a diverse dataset by combining multiple existing CEFR-annotated corpora with synthetic data.<n>Our results show a consistent performance improvement over prior methods, highlighting the potential of LLMs for reliable and scalable CEFR classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-06T16:15:45Z)
• PL-Guard: Benchmarking Language Model Safety for Polish [43.39208658482427]
  We introduce a manually annotated benchmark dataset for language model safety classification in Polish.<n>We also create adversarially perturbed variants of these samples designed to challenge model robustness.<n>We train these models using different combinations of annotated data and evaluate their performance, comparing it against publicly available guard models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T13:56:41Z)
• MM-Eval: A Multilingual Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-as-a-Judge and Reward Models [3.961168847961322]
  MM-Eval is a multilingual meta-evaluation benchmark covering 18 languages and a Language Consistency subset spanning 122 languages.<n>A core attribute of MM-Eval is that, instead of merely translating existing English meta-evaluation benchmarks, it is designed with multilingual-specific challenges in mind.<n>Our results show that existing evaluators that excel in English contexts have considerable room for improvement when assessing non-English outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T06:04:55Z)
• DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation [75.81096662788254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are scalable and economical evaluators.<n>The question of how reliable these evaluators are has emerged as a crucial research question.<n>We propose Decompose and Aggregate, which breaks down the evaluation process into different stages based on pedagogical practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:12:30Z)
• Bridging the Bosphorus: Advancing Turkish Large Language Models through Strategies for Low-Resource Language Adaptation and Benchmarking [1.3716808114696444]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming crucial across various fields, emphasizing the urgency for high-quality models in underrepresented languages. This study explores the unique challenges faced by low-resource languages, such as data scarcity, model selection, evaluation, and computational limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T21:58:45Z)
• METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation [12.852595634767901]
  This study proposes a framework for an end-to-end assessment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. We create a dataset covering 10 languages containing native speaker judgments for the task of summarization. We compare the performance of LLM-based evaluators created using GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, and PaLM2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:14:54Z)
• Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization [132.25202059478065]
  We benchmark large language models (LLMs) on instruction controllable text summarization. Our study reveals that instruction controllable text summarization remains a challenging task for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T18:25:26Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Following [54.49567482594617]
  We introduce a challenging meta-evaluation benchmark, LLMBar, designed to test the ability of an LLM evaluator in discerning instruction-following outputs. We discover that different evaluators exhibit distinct performance on LLMBar and even the highest-scoring ones have substantial room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T16:38:11Z)
• Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? [20.476500441734427]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Their evaluation, particularly in languages beyond the top $20$, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T06:41:58Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark [53.663757126289795]
  This paper introduces GAOKAO-Bench, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples. With human evaluation, we obtain the converted total score of LLMs, including GPT-4, ChatGPT and ERNIE-Bot. We also use LLMs to grade the subjective questions, and find that model scores achieve a moderate level of consistency with human scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T14:39:28Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization [79.37850439866938]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automatic summarization but the reasons behind their successes are poorly understood. We find instruction tuning, and not model size, is the key to the LLM's zero-shot summarization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T18:46:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.