Automatic Assessment of Students' Classroom Engagement with Bias Mitigated Multi-task Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22057v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 22:39:01 GMT
• Title: Automatic Assessment of Students' Classroom Engagement with Bias Mitigated Multi-task Model
• Authors: James Thiering, Tarun Sethupat Radha Krishna, Dylan Zelkin, Ashis Kumer Biswas,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on the need to develop an automated system to detect student engagement levels during online learning.<n>We proposed a novel training method which can discourage a model from leveraging sensitive features like gender for its predictions.<n>The proposed method offers benefits not only in the enforcement of ethical standards, but also to enhance interpretability of the model predictions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rise of online and virtual learning, monitoring and enhancing student engagement have become an important aspect of effective education. Traditional methods of assessing a student's involvement might not be applicable directly to virtual environments. In this study, we focused on this problem and addressed the need to develop an automated system to detect student engagement levels during online learning. We proposed a novel training method which can discourage a model from leveraging sensitive features like gender for its predictions. The proposed method offers benefits not only in the enforcement of ethical standards, but also to enhance interpretability of the model predictions. We applied an attribute-orthogonal regularization technique to a split-model classifier, which uses multiple transfer learning strategies to achieve effective results in reducing disparity in the distribution of prediction for sensitivity groups from a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.897 for the unmitigated model, to 0.999 for the mitigated model. The source code for this project is available on https://github.com/ashiskb/elearning-engagement-study .

Related papers

• Dual-level Modality Debiasing Learning for Unsupervised Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification [59.59359638389348]
  We propose a Dual-level Modality Debiasing Learning framework that implements debiasing at both the model and optimization levels.<n>Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that DMDL could enable modality-invariant feature learning and a more generalized model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T12:43:16Z)
• Efficient Machine Unlearning via Influence Approximation [75.31015485113993]
  Influence-based unlearning has emerged as a prominent approach to estimate the impact of individual training samples on model parameters without retraining.<n>This paper establishes a theoretical link between memorizing (incremental learning) and forgetting (unlearning)<n>We introduce the Influence Approximation Unlearning algorithm for efficient machine unlearning from the incremental perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T05:34:27Z)
• Supervised Contrastive Learning for Ordinal Engagement Measurement [2.166000001057538]
  Student engagement plays a crucial role in the successful delivery of educational programs.<n>This paper identifies two key challenges in this problem: class imbalance and incorporating order into engagement levels.<n>A novel approach to video-based student engagement measurement in virtual learning environments is proposed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:49:45Z)
• Privacy-Preserved Automated Scoring using Federated Learning for Educational Research [1.2556373621040728]
  We propose a federated learning (FL) framework for automated scoring of educational assessments.<n>We benchmark our model against two state-of-the-art FL methods and a centralized learning baseline.<n>Results show that our model achieves the highest accuracy (94.5%) among FL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T19:06:25Z)
• Uncovering Student Engagement Patterns in Moodle with Interpretable Machine Learning [0.0]
  This study introduces a methodology for quantifying engagement across an entire module using virtual learning environment (VLE) activity log data.<n>Using study session frequency, immediacy, and diversity, we create a cumulative engagement metric.<n>In a case study of a computing module at University College London's Department of Statistical Science, we examine how delivery methods impact student behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T14:47:25Z)
• Machine Unlearning with Minimal Gradient Dependence for High Unlearning Ratios [18.73206066109299]
  Mini-Unlearning is a novel approach that capitalizes on a critical observation: unlearned parameters correlate with retrained parameters through contraction mapping. This lightweight, scalable method significantly enhances model accuracy and strengthens resistance to membership inference attacks. Our experiments demonstrate that Mini-Unlearning not only works under higher unlearning ratios but also outperforms existing techniques in both accuracy and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T01:43:30Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models.<n>It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• From Pretext to Purpose: Batch-Adaptive Self-Supervised Learning [32.18543787821028]
  This paper proposes an adaptive technique of batch fusion for self-supervised contrastive learning. It achieves state-of-the-art performance under equitable comparisons. We suggest that the proposed method may contribute to the advancement of data-driven self-supervised learning research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T15:47:49Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• Learning to Learn Transferable Attack [77.67399621530052]
  Transfer adversarial attack is a non-trivial black-box adversarial attack that aims to craft adversarial perturbations on the surrogate model and then apply such perturbations to the victim model. We propose a Learning to Learn Transferable Attack (LLTA) method, which makes the adversarial perturbations more generalized via learning from both data and model augmentation. Empirical results on the widely-used dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack method with a 12.85% higher success rate of transfer attack compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T07:24:21Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Learning Diverse Representations for Fast Adaptation to Distribution Shift [78.83747601814669]
  We present a method for learning multiple models, incorporating an objective that pressures each to learn a distinct way to solve the task. We demonstrate our framework's ability to facilitate rapid adaptation to distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T12:23:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.