FAIR-RAG: Faithful Adaptive Iterative Refinement for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22344v1
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:59:33 GMT
- Title: FAIR-RAG: Faithful Adaptive Iterative Refinement for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Authors: Mohammad Aghajani Asl, Majid Asgari-Bidhendi, Behrooz Minaei-Bidgoli,
- Abstract summary: We introduce FAIR-RAG, a novel agentic framework that transforms the standard RAG pipeline into a dynamic, evidence-driven reasoning process.<n>We conduct experiments on challenging multi-hop QA benchmarks, including HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MusiQue.<n>Our work demonstrates that a structured, evidence-driven refinement process with explicit gap analysis is crucial for unlocking reliable and accurate reasoning in advanced RAG systems.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination and knowledge staleness in Large Language Models (LLMs), existing frameworks often falter on complex, multi-hop queries that require synthesizing information from disparate sources. Current advanced RAG methods, employing iterative or adaptive strategies, lack a robust mechanism to systematically identify and fill evidence gaps, often propagating noise or failing to gather a comprehensive context. We introduce FAIR-RAG, a novel agentic framework that transforms the standard RAG pipeline into a dynamic, evidence-driven reasoning process. At its core is an Iterative Refinement Cycle governed by a module we term Structured Evidence Assessment (SEA). The SEA acts as an analytical gating mechanism: it deconstructs the initial query into a checklist of required findings and audits the aggregated evidence to identify confirmed facts and, critically, explicit informational gaps. These gaps provide a precise signal to an Adaptive Query Refinement agent, which generates new, targeted sub-queries to retrieve missing information. This cycle repeats until the evidence is verified as sufficient, ensuring a comprehensive context for a final, strictly faithful generation. We conducted experiments on challenging multi-hop QA benchmarks, including HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MusiQue. In a unified experimental setup, FAIR-RAG significantly outperforms strong baselines. On HotpotQA, it achieves an F1-score of 0.453 -- an absolute improvement of 8.3 points over the strongest iterative baseline -- establishing a new state-of-the-art for this class of methods on these benchmarks. Our work demonstrates that a structured, evidence-driven refinement process with explicit gap analysis is crucial for unlocking reliable and accurate reasoning in advanced RAG systems for complex, knowledge-intensive tasks.
Related papers
- Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z) - RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [33.389969814185214]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well RAG systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-01T02:42:36Z) - ComposeRAG: A Modular and Composable RAG for Corpus-Grounded Multi-Hop Question Answering [42.238086712267396]
ComposeRAG is a novel modular abstraction that decomposes RAG pipelines into atomic, composable modules.<n>It consistently outperforms strong baselines in both accuracy and grounding fidelity.<n>Its verification-first design reduces ungrounded answers by over 10% in low-quality retrieval settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T21:10:30Z) - Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers [0.0]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm to enhance large language models.<n>RAG introduces new challenges in retrieval quality, grounding fidelity, pipeline efficiency, and robustness against noisy or adversarial inputs.<n>This survey aims to consolidate current knowledge in RAG research and serve as a foundation for the next generation of retrieval-augmented language modeling systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T22:57:04Z) - DO-RAG: A Domain-Specific QA Framework Using Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.113142669523488]
Domain-specific QA systems require generative fluency but high factual accuracy grounded in structured expert knowledge.<n>We propose DO-RAG, a scalable and customizable hybrid QA framework that integrates multi-level knowledge graph construction with semantic vector retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T06:40:17Z) - Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z) - Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [91.02950964802454]
This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z) - Retrieval-Augmented Generation by Evidence Retroactivity in LLMs [19.122314663040726]
Retroactive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RetroRAG) is a novel framework to build a retroactive reasoning paradigm.<n>RetroRAG revises and updates the evidence, redirecting the reasoning chain to the correct direction.<n> Empirical evaluations show that RetroRAG significantly outperforms existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:57:42Z) - Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z) - Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through
Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG)
Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection.
It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.