ComposeRAG: A Modular and Composable RAG for Corpus-Grounded Multi-Hop Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00232v1
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 21:10:30 GMT
• Title: ComposeRAG: A Modular and Composable RAG for Corpus-Grounded Multi-Hop Question Answering
• Authors: Ruofan Wu, Youngwon Lee, Fan Shu, Danmei Xu, Seung-won Hwang, Zhewei Yao, Yuxiong He, Feng Yan,
• Abstract summary: ComposeRAG is a novel modular abstraction that decomposes RAG pipelines into atomic, composable modules.<n>It consistently outperforms strong baselines in both accuracy and grounding fidelity.<n>Its verification-first design reduces ungrounded answers by over 10% in low-quality retrieval settings.
• Score: 42.238086712267396
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly diverse, yet many suffer from monolithic designs that tightly couple core functions like query reformulation, retrieval, reasoning, and verification. This limits their interpretability, systematic evaluation, and targeted improvement, especially for complex multi-hop question answering. We introduce ComposeRAG, a novel modular abstraction that decomposes RAG pipelines into atomic, composable modules. Each module, such as Question Decomposition, Query Rewriting, Retrieval Decision, and Answer Verification, acts as a parameterized transformation on structured inputs/outputs, allowing independent implementation, upgrade, and analysis. To enhance robustness against errors in multi-step reasoning, ComposeRAG incorporates a self-reflection mechanism that iteratively revisits and refines earlier steps upon verification failure. Evaluated on four challenging multi-hop QA benchmarks, ComposeRAG consistently outperforms strong baselines in both accuracy and grounding fidelity. Specifically, it achieves up to a 15% accuracy improvement over fine-tuning-based methods and up to a 5% gain over reasoning-specialized pipelines under identical retrieval conditions. Crucially, ComposeRAG significantly enhances grounding: its verification-first design reduces ungrounded answers by over 10% in low-quality retrieval settings, and by approximately 3% even with strong corpora. Comprehensive ablation studies validate the modular architecture, demonstrating distinct and additive contributions from each component. These findings underscore ComposeRAG's capacity to deliver flexible, transparent, scalable, and high-performing multi-hop reasoning with improved grounding and interpretability.

Related papers

• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• PrismRAG: Boosting RAG Factuality with Distractor Resilience and Strategized Reasoning [57.89188317734747]
  PrismRAG trains the model with distractor-aware QA pairs mixing gold evidence with subtle distractor passages.<n>It instills reasoning-centric habits that make the LLM plan, rationalize, and synthesize without relying on extensive human engineered instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T00:15:31Z)
• DO-RAG: A Domain-Specific QA Framework Using Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.113142669523488]
  Domain-specific QA systems require generative fluency but high factual accuracy grounded in structured expert knowledge.<n>We propose DO-RAG, a scalable and customizable hybrid QA framework that integrates multi-level knowledge graph construction with semantic vector retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T06:40:17Z)
• Credible plan-driven RAG method for Multi-hop Question Answering [2.5772544412212985]
  Multi-hop question answering (QA) presents a considerable challenge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n> deviations in reasoning paths or errors in intermediate results, which are common in current RAG methods, may propagate and accumulate throughout the reasoning process.<n>We propose the Plan-then-Act-and-Review (PAR RAG) framework, which is organized into three key stages: planning, act, and review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T15:03:17Z)
• AlignRAG: Leveraging Critique Learning for Evidence-Sensitive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [61.28113271728859]
  RAG has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>Standard RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>In this work, we reinterpret RAG as Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning and identify a central but underexplored problem: textitReasoning Misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• CDF-RAG: Causal Dynamic Feedback for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.8808821719659763]
  We introduce Causal Dynamic Feedback for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CDF-RAG)<n>CDF-RAG iteratively refines queries, retrieves structured causal graphs, and enables multi-hop causal reasoning across interconnected knowledge sources.<n>We evaluate CDF-RAG on four diverse datasets, demonstrating its ability to improve response accuracy and causal correctness over existing RAG-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T01:15:13Z)
• MHTS: Multi-Hop Tree Structure Framework for Generating Difficulty-Controllable QA Datasets for RAG Evaluation [5.525151548786079]
  Existing RAG benchmarks often overlook query difficulty, leading to inflated performance on simpler questions and unreliable evaluations.<n>We propose MHTS (Multi-Hop Tree Structure), a novel dataset synthesis framework that controls multi-hop reasoning complexity by leveraging a multi-hop tree structure to generate logically connected, multi-chunk queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T06:26:01Z)
• Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [51.54046200512198]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is extensively utilized to incorporate external, current knowledge into large language models.<n>A standard RAG pipeline may comprise several components, such as query rewriting, document retrieval, document filtering, and answer generation.<n>To overcome these challenges, we propose treating the RAG pipeline as a multi-agent cooperative task, with each component regarded as an RL agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T14:24:50Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.