Machine-Learning-Assisted Comparison of Regression Functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24714v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:59:15 GMT
• Title: Machine-Learning-Assisted Comparison of Regression Functions
• Abstract summary: We revisit the classical problem of comparing regression functions, a fundamental question in statistical inference.<n>We propose a new notion of kernel-based conditional mean dependence that provides a new characterization of the null hypothesis of equal regression functions.<n>We develop two novel tests that leverage modern machine learning methods for flexible estimation.
• Score: 6.536054952579518
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We revisit the classical problem of comparing regression functions, a fundamental question in statistical inference with broad relevance to modern applications such as data integration, transfer learning, and causal inference. Existing approaches typically rely on smoothing techniques and are thus hindered by the curse of dimensionality. We propose a generalized notion of kernel-based conditional mean dependence that provides a new characterization of the null hypothesis of equal regression functions. Building on this reformulation, we develop two novel tests that leverage modern machine learning methods for flexible estimation. We establish the asymptotic properties of the test statistics, which hold under both fixed- and high-dimensional regimes. Unlike existing methods that often require restrictive distributional assumptions, our framework only imposes mild moment conditions. The efficacy of the proposed tests is demonstrated through extensive numerical studies.

Related papers

• Non-Parametric Rehearsal Learning via Conditional Mean Embeddings [88.89267783967263]
  We propose a non-parametric rehearsal learning approach for textitavoiding undesired future (AUF) problems.<n>Specifically, we use kernel machinery to reformulate the AUF objective into a unified representation that disentangles desirability modeling from action-induced distributional changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:30:52Z)
• Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
  This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective.<n>The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning.<n>The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z)
• Statistical Inference for Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximation [55.80276145563105]
  We investigate the statistical properties of Temporal Difference learning with Polyak-Ruppert averaging.<n>We make three theoretical contributions that improve upon the current state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T15:34:44Z)
• Model Free Prediction with Uncertainty Assessment [7.524024486998338]
  We propose a novel framework that transforms the deep estimation paradigm into a platform conducive to conditional mean estimation. We develop an end-to-end convergence rate for the conditional diffusion model and establish the normality of the generated samples. Through numerical experiments, we empirically validate the efficacy of our proposed methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T11:19:50Z)
• A Stability Principle for Learning under Non-Stationarity [1.1510009152620668]
  We develop a versatile framework for statistical learning in non-stationary environments.<n>We prove regret bounds that are minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors when the population losses are strongly convex, or Lipschitz only.<n>We evaluate the practical performance of our approach through real-data experiments on electricity demand prediction and hospital nurse staffing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T17:53:53Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Vector-Valued Least-Squares Regression under Output Regularity Assumptions [73.99064151691597]
  We propose and analyse a reduced-rank method for solving least-squares regression problems with infinite dimensional output. We derive learning bounds for our method, and study under which setting statistical performance is improved in comparison to full-rank method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T15:07:00Z)
• New Insights into Learning with Correntropy Based Regression [3.066157114715031]
  We show that correntropy based regression regresses towards conditional mode function or the conditional mean function robustly under certain conditions. We also present some new results when it is utilized to learn the conditional mean function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T21:14:34Z)
• Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive Attributes [13.114114427206678]
  We present a flexible framework for learning predictive models that approximately satisfy the equalized odds notion of fairness. This differentiable functional is used as a penalty driving the model parameters towards equalized odds. We develop a formal hypothesis test to detect whether a prediction rule violates this property, the first such test in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T00:18:34Z)
• The empirical duality gap of constrained statistical learning [115.23598260228587]
  We study the study of constrained statistical learning problems, the unconstrained version of which are at the core of virtually all modern information processing. We propose to tackle the constrained statistical problem overcoming its infinite dimensionality, unknown distributions, and constraints by leveraging finite dimensional parameterizations, sample averages, and duality theory. We demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of this constrained formulation in a fair learning application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T19:12:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.