Bayesian Neural Networks vs. Mixture Density Networks: Theoretical and Empirical Insights for Uncertainty-Aware Nonlinear Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25001v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 22:00:30 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Neural Networks vs. Mixture Density Networks: Theoretical and Empirical Insights for Uncertainty-Aware Nonlinear Modeling
• Authors: Riddhi Pratim Ghosh, Ian Barnett,
• Abstract summary: We compare the approaches of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) and Mixture Density Networks (MDNs) for uncertainty-aware nonlinear regression.<n>On the theoretical side, we derive convergence rates and error bounds under H"older smoothness conditions, showing that MDNs achieve faster Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence convergence.<n>Our findings clarify the complementary strengths of posterior-based and likelihood-based probabilistic learning, offering guidance for uncertainty-aware modeling in nonlinear systems.
• Score: 2.0797819204842036
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates two prominent probabilistic neural modeling paradigms: Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) and Mixture Density Networks (MDNs) for uncertainty-aware nonlinear regression. While BNNs incorporate epistemic uncertainty by placing prior distributions over network parameters, MDNs directly model the conditional output distribution, thereby capturing multimodal and heteroscedastic data-generating mechanisms. We present a unified theoretical and empirical framework comparing these approaches. On the theoretical side, we derive convergence rates and error bounds under H\"older smoothness conditions, showing that MDNs achieve faster Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence convergence due to their likelihood-based nature, whereas BNNs exhibit additional approximation bias induced by variational inference. Empirically, we evaluate both architectures on synthetic nonlinear datasets and a radiographic benchmark (RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge). Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that MDNs more effectively capture multimodal responses and adaptive uncertainty, whereas BNNs provide more interpretable epistemic uncertainty under limited data. Our findings clarify the complementary strengths of posterior-based and likelihood-based probabilistic learning, offering guidance for uncertainty-aware modeling in nonlinear systems.

Related papers

• Enhancing Uncertainty Estimation and Interpretability via Bayesian Non-negative Decision Layer [55.66973223528494]
  We develop a Bayesian Non-negative Decision Layer (BNDL), which reformulates deep neural networks as a conditional Bayesian non-negative factor analysis.<n>BNDL can model complex dependencies and provide robust uncertainty estimation.<n>We also offer theoretical guarantees that BNDL can achieve effective disentangled learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T10:23:34Z)
• Quantification of Uncertainties in Probabilistic Deep Neural Network by Implementing Boosting of Variational Inference [0.38366697175402226]
  Boosted Bayesian Neural Networks (BBNN) is a novel approach that enhances neural network weight distribution approximations.<n>BBNN achieves 5% higher accuracy compared to conventional neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T05:11:21Z)
• Evidential Uncertainty Probes for Graph Neural Networks [3.5169632430086315]
  We propose a plug-and-play framework for uncertainty quantification in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)<n>Our Evidential Probing Network (EPN) uses a lightweight Multi-Layer-Perceptron (MLP) head to extract evidence from learned representations.<n>EPN-reg achieves state-of-the-art performance in accurate and efficient uncertainty quantification, making it suitable for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T07:00:54Z)
• Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensembles [0.7499722271664145]
  Neural networks (NNs) often assign high confidence to their predictions, even for points far out-of-distribution. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a challenge when they are employed to model interatomic potentials in materials systems. Differentiable UQ techniques can find new informative data and drive active learning loops for robust potentials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T19:41:17Z)
• Variational Neural Networks [88.24021148516319]
  We propose a method for uncertainty estimation in neural networks called Variational Neural Network (VNN) VNN generates parameters for the output distribution of a layer by transforming its inputs with learnable sub-layers. In uncertainty quality estimation experiments, we show that VNNs achieve better uncertainty quality than Monte Carlo Dropout or Bayes By Backpropagation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T15:41:02Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Influence Estimation and Maximization via Neural Mean-Field Dynamics [60.91291234832546]
  We propose a novel learning framework using neural mean-field (NMF) dynamics for inference and estimation problems. Our framework can simultaneously learn the structure of the diffusion network and the evolution of node infection probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T00:02:05Z)
• Multidimensional Uncertainty-Aware Evidential Neural Networks [21.716045815385268]
  We propose a novel uncertainty-aware evidential NN called WGAN-ENN (WENN) for solving an out-of-versa (OOD) detection problem. We took a hybrid approach that combines Wasserstein Generative Adrial Network (WGAN) with ENNs to jointly train a model with prior knowledge of a certain class. We demonstrated that the estimation of uncertainty by WENN can significantly help distinguish OOD samples from boundary samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-26T04:28:56Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Network Diffusions via Neural Mean-Field Dynamics [52.091487866968286]
  We propose a novel learning framework for inference and estimation problems of diffusion on networks. Our framework is derived from the Mori-Zwanzig formalism to obtain an exact evolution of the node infection probabilities. Our approach is versatile and robust to variations of the underlying diffusion network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T18:45:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.