PRISM: Proof-Carrying Artifact Generation through LLM x MDE Synergy and Stratified Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25890v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:44:22 GMT
• Title: PRISM: Proof-Carrying Artifact Generation through LLM x MDE Synergy and Stratified Constraints
• Abstract summary: PRISM unifies Large Language Models with Model-Driven Engineering.<n>It generates regulator-ready artifacts and machine-checkable evidence for safety- and compliance-critical domains.
• Score: 4.573877234904622
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: PRISM unifies Large Language Models with Model-Driven Engineering to generate regulator-ready artifacts and machine-checkable evidence for safety- and compliance-critical domains. PRISM integrates three pillars: a Unified Meta-Model (UMM) reconciles heterogeneous schemas and regulatory text into a single semantic space; an Integrated Constraint Model (ICM) compiles structural and semantic requirements into enforcement artifacts including generation-time automata (GBNF, DFA) and post-generation validators (e.g., SHACL, SMT); and Constraint-Guided Verifiable Generation (CVG) applies these through two-layer enforcement - structural constraints drive prefix-safe decoding while semantic/logical validation produces machine-checkable certificates. When violations occur, PRISM performs audit-guided repair and records generation traces for compliance review. We evaluate PRISM in automotive software engineering (AUTOSAR) and cross-border legal jurisdiction (Brussels I bis). PRISM produces structurally valid, auditable artifacts that integrate with existing tooling and substantially reduce manual remediation effort, providing a practical path toward automated artifact generation with built-in assurance.

Related papers

• Agent Gym: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation and Evolution of LLM Agents Through Human-in-the-Loop Feedback [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents face a fundamental tension: the agent's behavior is frozen at deployment time, while the business rules and edge cases it must handle continue to evolve.<n>Existing approaches address agent construction and one-time evaluation but provide no structured mechanism for continuous post-deployment behavioral correction.<n>We introduce Agent Gym, a modular, domain-agnostic framework that wraps any existing LLM-based agent in a continuous evaluation-and-evolution loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-16T07:27:26Z)
• Formal Verification of Agentic Systems over Operational Data [59.98246281888422]
  Agentic systems driven by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world where they act on persistent operational data.<n>Existing approaches do not provide such system-level guarantees.<n>We study here the verification of agentic systems comprising a single LLM and a tool orchestration harness over relational operational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T13:01:30Z)
• Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models [62.62160094849002]
  RADIANT is an engineering methodology that combines MDE with Multi-Agent Large Language Models.<n>It automatically generates heterogeneous models across engineering phases.<n>It provides exact, automated change-impact analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T08:50:55Z)
• Automating Cause-Effect Specification with Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models [0.1223474232275842]
  This paper presents a semantic-AI framework that automates the generation of C&E logic.<n>The framework combines a knowledge graph (KG) with a constrained large language model (LLM) layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T13:03:46Z)
• PRIMA: Operational Patterns for Resilient Multi-Agent Research with Verifiable Identity and Convergent Feedback [0.0]
  PRIMA operates as coordinated multi-agent research systems over multi-hour runs.<n>Main contributions are three operational patterns for surviving failure modes.<n>A Graph Isomorphism case study grounds the architectural claims in a generated artifact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T23:27:46Z)
• Structure-Aware RAG: Structured Retrieval Augmented Generation from Noisy Data for Conversational Agents [68.52563127206808]
  Structure-aware Retrieval Augmented Generation (SA-RAG) uses tables as an intermediate structured representation to provide a compact and controllable interface.<n>We introduce a quality-aware table metadata generation framework that models metadata normalization and effectiveness.<n>Experiments on two noisy real-world datasets show that SA-RAG significantly outperforms existing RAG baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T03:07:33Z)
• Learning and Enforcing Context-Sensitive Control for LLMs [48.58004364546273]
  We introduce a framework that automatically learns context-sensitive constraints from Large Language Models interactions.<n>Experiments demonstrate that our method enables even small LLMs (1B parameters) to learn and generate with perfect constraint adherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T14:50:03Z)
• REGAL: A Registry-Driven Architecture for Deterministic Grounding of Agentic AI in Enterprise Telemetry [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) enable new forms of agentic automation.<n>We present REGAL, a registry-driven architecture for deterministic grounding of agentic AI systems in enterprise telemetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T14:13:39Z)
• From Completion to Editing: Unlocking Context-Aware Code Infilling via Search-and-Replace Instruction Tuning [81.97788535387286]
  We propose a framework that internalizes the agentic verification-and-editing mechanism into a unified, single-pass inference process.<n>With minimal data, SRI-Coder enables Chat models to surpass the completion performance of their Base counterparts.<n>Unlike FIM-style tuning, SRI preserves general coding competencies and maintains inference latency comparable to standard FIM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T20:33:53Z)
• AI Bill of Materials and Beyond: Systematizing Security Assurance through the AI Risk Scanning (AIRS) Framework [31.261980405052938]
  Assurance for artificial intelligence (AI) systems remains fragmented across software supply-chain security, adversarial machine learning, and governance documentation.<n>This paper introduces the AI Risk Scanning (AIRS) Framework, a threat-model-based, evidence-generating framework designed to operationalize AI assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T16:10:38Z)
• "Show Me You Comply... Without Showing Me Anything": Zero-Knowledge Software Auditing for AI-Enabled Systems [2.2981698355892686]
  This paper introduces ZKMLOps, a novel MLOps verification framework.<n>It operationalizes Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)-cryptographic protocols allowing a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true.<n>We evaluate the framework's practicality through a study of regulatory compliance in financial risk auditing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T15:03:32Z)
• Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
  Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z)
• Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study [6.530899637501737]
  Building officials face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity.<n>This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T00:30:14Z)
• Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
  This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
• Large Language Model-Driven Code Compliance Checking in Building Information Modeling [3.2648052741820166]
  This research addresses the time-consuming and error-prone nature of manual code compliance checking in Building Information Modeling.<n>It introduces a Large Language Model (LLM)-driven approach to semi-automate this critical process.<n>The developed system integrates LLMs such as GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Llama, with Revit software to interpret building codes, generate Python scripts, and perform semi-automated compliance checks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T15:50:34Z)
• AI4Contracts: LLM & RAG-Powered Encoding of Financial Derivative Contracts [1.3060230641655135]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) are reshaping how AI systems extract and organize information from unstructured text.<n>We introduce CDMizer, a template-driven, LLM, and RAG-based framework for structured text transformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T16:05:00Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems [39.23499993745249]
  We introduce semantic integrity constraints (SICs) for specifying and enforcing correctness conditions over LLM outputs in semantic queries.<n>SICs generalize traditional database integrity constraints to semantic settings, supporting common types of constraints, such as grounding, soundness, and exclusion.<n>We present a system design for integrating SICs into query planning and runtime and discuss its realization in AI-augmented DPSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T19:59:25Z)
• Towards Copyright Protection for Knowledge Bases of Retrieval-augmented Language Models via Reasoning [58.57194301645823]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world personalized applications.<n>The valuable and often proprietary nature of the knowledge bases used in RAG introduces the risk of unauthorized usage by adversaries.<n>Existing methods that can be generalized as watermarking techniques to protect these knowledge bases typically involve poisoning or backdoor attacks.<n>We propose name for harmless' copyright protection of knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T09:15:56Z)
• A General Framework for Verification and Control of Dynamical Models via Certificate Synthesis [54.959571890098786]
  We provide a framework to encode system specifications and define corresponding certificates. We present an automated approach to formally synthesise controllers and certificates. Our approach contributes to the broad field of safe learning for control, exploiting the flexibility of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T09:37:26Z)
• Relational Action Bases: Formalization, Effective Safety Verification, and Invariants (Extended Version) [67.99023219822564]
  We introduce the general framework of relational action bases (RABs) RABs generalize existing models by lifting both restrictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a benchmark of data-aware business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T17:03:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.