The Role of Search Engines in the Amplification and Suppression of LGBTIQ+ Polarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27248v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 07:32:35 GMT
• Title: The Role of Search Engines in the Amplification and Suppression of LGBTIQ+ Polarization
• Authors: Ronja Rönnback, Chris Emmery, Marie Šafář Postma, Filip Milde, Jan Charvát, Henry Brighton,
• Abstract summary: Polarization refers to a shift toward and the acceptance of ideological extremes.<n>In Europe, polarizing content in relation to LGBTIQ+ issues has been a feature of various ideological and political conflicts.<n>Here, we report on a large-scale study of 1.5 million search results responding to neutral and negative queries relating to LGBTIQ+ issues.
• Score: 0.4412791021385365
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Search engines are used and trusted by hundreds of millions of people every day. However, the algorithms used by search engines to index, filter, and rank web content are inherently biased, and will necessarily prefer some views and opinions at the expense of others. In this article, we examine how these algorithmic biases amplify and suppress polarizing content. Polarization refers to a shift toward and the acceptance of ideological extremes. In Europe, polarizing content in relation to LGBTIQ+ issues has been a feature of various ideological and political conflicts. Although past research has focused on the role of social media in polarization, the role of search engines in this process is little understood. Here, we report on a large-scale study of 1.5 million search results responding to neutral and negative queries relating to LGBTIQ+ issues. Focusing on the UK, Germany, and France, our analysis shows that the choice of search engine is the key determinant of exposure to polarizing content, followed by the polarity of the query. Location and language, on the other hand, have a comparatively minor effect. Consequently, our findings provide quantitative insights into how differences between search engine technologies, rather than the opinions, language, and location of web users, have the greatest impact on the exposure of web users to polarizing Web content.

Related papers

• Social and Political Framing in Search Engine Results [5.478764356647437]
  This study analyzes the outputs of major search engines using a dataset of political and social topics.<n>The findings reveal that search engines prioritize content in ways that reflect underlying biases.<n>Significant differences were observed across search engines in terms of the sources they prioritize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T17:44:33Z)
• Search engines in polarized media environment: Auditing political information curation on Google and Bing prior to 2024 US elections [0.0]
  We audit the two largest Western search engines, Google and Bing, prior to the 2024 US presidential elections.<n>Our findings indicate that both search engines tend to prioritize left-leaning media sources, with the exact scope of search results' ideological slant varying between Democrat- and Republican-focused queries.<n>We also observe limited effects of location- and time-based factors on organic search results, whereas results for additional interface elements were more volatile over time and specific US states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:18:03Z)
• Opinion de-polarization of social networks with GNNs [9.49192088119451]
  We propose an efficient algorithm to identify a good set of K users, such that if they adopt a moderate stance around a topic, the polarization is minimized.<n>Our algorithm employs a Graph Neural Network and thus it can handle large graphs more effectively than other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T16:09:50Z)
• Investigating Bias in Political Search Query Suggestions by Relative Comparison with LLMs [1.5356574175312299]
  bias in search query suggestions can lead to exposure to biased search results and can impact opinion formation. We use a multi-step approach to identify and quantify bias in English search query suggestions. We apply our approach to the U.S. political news domain and compare bias in Google and Bing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:40:38Z)
• A comparison of online search engine autocompletion in Google and Baidu [3.5016560416031886]
  We study the characteristics of search auto-completions in two different linguistic and cultural contexts: Baidu and Google. We find differences between the two search engines in the way they suppress or modify original queries. Our study highlights the need for more refined, culturally sensitive moderation strategies in current language technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T08:17:04Z)
• Generative Echo Chamber? Effects of LLM-Powered Search Systems on Diverse Information Seeking [49.02867094432589]
  Large language models (LLMs) powered conversational search systems have already been used by hundreds of millions of people. We investigate whether and how LLMs with opinion biases that either reinforce or challenge the user's view change the effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T18:14:33Z)
• User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
  We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search. We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results. More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.