Research Output on Alopecia Areata Disease: A Scientometric Analysis of Publications from 2010 to 2019

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02275v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 05:26:46 GMT
• Title: Research Output on Alopecia Areata Disease: A Scientometric Analysis of Publications from 2010 to 2019
• Authors: Muneer Ahmad, M Sadik Batcha,
• Abstract summary: The study mainly focus on distribution of research output, top journals for publications, most prolific authors, authorship pattern, and citations pattern on Alopecia Areata Disease.
• Score: 0.3093890460224435
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The present study is undertaken to find out the publication trends on Alopecia Areata Disease during 2010-2019 from the global perspective. The study mainly focus on distribution of research output, top journals for publications, most prolific authors, authorship pattern, and citations pattern on Alopecia Areata Disease. The results indicate that highest growth rate of publications occurred during the year 2019. Columbia University topped the scene among all institutes. The maximum publications were more than four authored publications. Christiano AM and Clynes R were found to be the most prolific authors. It is also found that most of the prolific authors (by number of publications) do appear in highly cited publications list. Alopecia Areata Disease researchers mostly preferred using article publications to communicate their findings.

Related papers

• Mapping a Decade of Avian Influenza Research (2014-2023): A Scientometric Analysis from Web of Science [0.22166578153935787]
  This study analyzes Avian Influenza research from 2014 to 2023 using data from the Web of Science database.<n>Results reveal a steady increase in publications, with high contributions from Chinese and American institutions.<n>China and the USA lead in publication volume, though developed nations like the United Kingdom and Germany exhibit a higher rate of international collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T06:37:20Z)
• Russian Contribution to Coronary Artery Disease Research: A Scientometric Mapping of Publications [0.3093890460224435]
  This study is based on secondary data extracted from the Science Citation Index (SCI), which is an integral component of the Web of Science.<n>There were 5058 articles by Russian scholars in coronary artery disease during 1990-2019; they preferred to publish in Russian journals.<n>Co-authorship was the norm in coronary artery disease research, with a steady increase in the number of multi-author documents in recent years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T06:06:19Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Groundbreaking Machine Learning Research: Analyzing highly cited and impactful publications across six decades [1.6442870218029522]
  Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a prominent field of research in computer science and other related fields. It is crucial to understand the landscape of highly cited publications to identify key trends, influential authors, and significant contributions made thus far.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T21:43:22Z)
• A scientometric analysis of the effect of COVID-19 on the spread of research outputs [0.0]
  Sars-COV-2 pandemic in 2020 had a huge impact on the life course of all of us. This rapid spread has caused an increase in the research production in topics related to COVID-19. Italy has, unfortunately, been one of the first countries to be massively involved in the outbreak of the disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T18:26:37Z)
• Geographic Citation Gaps in NLP Research [63.13508571014673]
  This work asks a series of questions on the relationship between geographical location and publication success. We first created a dataset of 70,000 papers from the ACL Anthology, extracted their meta-information, and generated their citation network. We show that not only are there substantial geographical disparities in paper acceptance and citation but also that these disparities persist even when controlling for a number of variables such as venue of publication and sub-field of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:25:23Z)
• Domain-Specific Pretraining for Vertical Search: Case Study on Biomedical Literature [67.4680600632232]
  Self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising direction to overcome the annotation bottleneck. We propose a general approach for vertical search based on domain-specific pretraining. Our system can scale to tens of millions of articles on PubMed and has been deployed as Microsoft Biomedical Search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T01:02:55Z)
• Studying the characteristics of scientific communities using individual-level bibliometrics: the case of Big Data research [2.208242292882514]
  We study the academic age, production, and research focus of the community of authors active in Big Data research. Results show that the academic realm of "Big Data" is a growing topic with an expanding community of authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T08:17:09Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
  The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world. We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research. Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z)
• The Demise of Single-Authored Publications in Computer Science: A Citation Network Analysis [0.0]
  I analyze the DBLP database to study role of single author publications in the computer science literature between 1940 and 2019. I examine the demographics and reception by computing the population fraction, citation statistics, and scores of single author publications over the years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T07:47:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.