Fuzzy Soft Set Theory based Expert System for the Risk Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02392v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:19:16 GMT
• Title: Fuzzy Soft Set Theory based Expert System for the Risk Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients
• Authors: Muhammad Sheharyar Liaqat,
• Abstract summary: This study presents a fuzzy soft set theory-based expert system designed to assess the risk of breast cancer in patients.<n>The proposed system integrates Body Mass Index, Insulin Level, Leptin Level, Adiponectin Level, and age as input variables to estimate breast cancer risk.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide, with early diagnosis being critical for effective treatment and improved survival rates. However, timely detection continues to be a challenge due to the complex nature of the disease and variability in patient risk factors. This study presents a fuzzy soft set theory-based expert system designed to assess the risk of breast cancer in patients using measurable clinical and physiological parameters. The proposed system integrates Body Mass Index, Insulin Level, Leptin Level, Adiponectin Level, and age as input variables to estimate breast cancer risk through a set of fuzzy inference rules and soft set computations. These parameters can be obtained from routine blood analyses, enabling a non-invasive and accessible method for preliminary assessment. The dataset used for model development and validation was obtained from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The proposed expert system aims to support healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk patients and determining the necessity of further diagnostic procedures such as biopsies.

Related papers

• PSO-XAI: A PSO-Enhanced Explainable AI Framework for Reliable Breast Cancer Detection [2.5631347250059577]
  This study proposes an integrated framework that incorporates customized Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for feature selection.<n>The proposed approach achieved a superior score of 99.1% across all performance metrics, including accuracy and precision.<n>Results highlight the potential of combining swarm intelligence with explainable ML for robust, trustworthy, and clinically meaningful breast cancer diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T14:42:50Z)
• An Explainable Hybrid AI Framework for Enhanced Tuberculosis and Symptom Detection [55.35661671061754]
  Tuberculosis remains a critical global health issue, particularly in resource-limited and remote areas.<n>We propose a framework which enhances disease and symptom detection on chest X-rays by integrating two supervised heads and a self-supervised head.<n>Our model achieves an accuracy of 98.85% for distinguishing between COVID-19, tuberculosis, and normal cases, and a macro-F1 score of 90.09% for multilabel symptom detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T17:18:55Z)
• Reasoning Language Model for Personalized Lung Cancer Screening [10.241766336141685]
  Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) faces trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity.<n>We propose a reasoning language model (RLM) to integrate radiology findings with longitudinal medical records for individualized lung cancer risk assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T18:38:39Z)
• Early Mortality Prediction in ICU Patients with Hypertensive Kidney Disease Using Interpretable Machine Learning [3.4335475695580127]
  Hypertensive kidney disease (HKD) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) face high short-term mortality.<n>We developed a machine learning framework to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with HKD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T00:48:23Z)
• Machine Learning Meets Transparency in Osteoporosis Risk Assessment: A Comparative Study of ML and Explainability Analysis [0.0]
  The present research tackles the difficulty of predicting osteoporosis risk via machine learning (ML) approaches.<n>XGBoost had the greatest accuracy (91%) among the evaluated models, surpassing others in precision (0.92), recall (0.91), and F1-score (0.90)<n>The study indicates that age is the primary determinant in forecasting osteoporosis risk, followed by hormonal alterations and familial history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T09:05:02Z)
• Machine learning for cerebral blood vessels' malformations [38.524104108347764]
  Cerebral aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations are life-threatening hemodynamic pathologies of the brain.<n> Parameters of cerebral blood flow could potentially be utilized in machine learning-assisted protocols for risk assessment and therapeutic prognosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T12:58:00Z)
• Deep learning-based identification of patients at increased risk of cancer using routine laboratory markers [2.482109221766753]
  Cancer screening involves an initial risk stratification step to determine the screening method and frequency.<n>For most screening programs, age and clinical risk factors such as family history are part of the initial risk stratification algorithm.<n>We demonstrate that the combination of simple, widely available blood tests, such as complete blood count and complete metabolic panel, could potentially be used to identify patients at risk for colorectal, liver, and lung cancers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T15:50:27Z)
• Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques [37.9243470221619]
  Article explores the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.<n>Aims to highlight the potential of XAI in bridging the gap between complex AI models and practical healthcare applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T18:50:03Z)
• Region-specific Risk Quantification for Interpretable Prognosis of COVID-19 [36.731054010197035]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has strained global public health, necessitating accurate diagnosis and intervention to control disease spread and reduce mortality rates. This paper introduces an interpretable deep survival prediction model designed specifically for improved understanding and trust in COVID-19 prognosis using chest X-ray (CXR) images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T05:08:38Z)
• Penalized Deep Partially Linear Cox Models with Application to CT Scans of Lung Cancer Patients [42.09584755334577]
  Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, highlighting the importance of understanding its mortality risks to design effective therapies. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) employed computed tomography texture analysis to quantify the mortality risks of lung cancer patients. We propose a novel Penalized Deep Partially Linear Cox Model (Penalized DPLC), which incorporates the SCAD penalty to select important texture features and employs a deep neural network to estimate the nonparametric component of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:38:16Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• MIA-Prognosis: A Deep Learning Framework to Predict Therapy Response [58.0291320452122]
  This paper aims at a unified deep learning approach to predict patient prognosis and therapy response. We formalize the prognosis modeling as a multi-modal asynchronous time series classification task. Our predictive model could further stratify low-risk and high-risk patients in terms of long-term survival.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:30:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.