Fair and Explainable Credit-Scoring under Concept Drift: Adaptive Explanation Frameworks for Evolving Populations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03807v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 19:14:43 GMT
• Title: Fair and Explainable Credit-Scoring under Concept Drift: Adaptive Explanation Frameworks for Evolving Populations
• Authors: Shivogo John,
• Abstract summary: We develop adaptive explanation frameworks that recalibrate interpretability and fairness in dynamically evolving credit models.<n>Results show that adaptive methods, particularly rebaselined and surrogate-based explanations, substantially improve temporal stability and reduce disparate impact across demographic groups without degrading predictive accuracy.<n>These findings establish adaptive explainability as a practical mechanism for sustaining transparency, accountability, and ethical reliability in data-driven credit systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evolving borrower behaviors, shifting economic conditions, and changing regulatory landscapes continuously reshape the data distributions underlying modern credit-scoring systems. Conventional explainability techniques, such as SHAP, assume static data and fixed background distributions, making their explanations unstable and potentially unfair when concept drift occurs. This study addresses that challenge by developing adaptive explanation frameworks that recalibrate interpretability and fairness in dynamically evolving credit models. Using a multi-year credit dataset, we integrate predictive modeling via XGBoost with three adaptive SHAP variants: (A) per-slice explanation reweighting that adjusts for feature distribution shifts, (B) drift-aware SHAP rebaselining with sliding-window background samples, and (C) online surrogate calibration using incremental Ridge regression. Each method is benchmarked against static SHAP explanations using metrics of predictive performance (AUC, F1), directional and rank stability (cosine, Kendall tau), and fairness (demographic parity and recalibration). Results show that adaptive methods, particularly rebaselined and surrogate-based explanations, substantially improve temporal stability and reduce disparate impact across demographic groups without degrading predictive accuracy. Robustness tests, including counterfactual perturbations, background sensitivity analysis, and proxy-variable detection, confirm the resilience of adaptive explanations under real-world drift conditions. These findings establish adaptive explainability as a practical mechanism for sustaining transparency, accountability, and ethical reliability in data-driven credit systems, and more broadly, in any domain where decision models evolve with population change.

Related papers

• Fed-ADE: Adaptive Learning Rate for Federated Post-adaptation under Distribution Shift [5.0727678479257685]
  Federated learning (FL) in post-deployment settings must adapt to non-stationary data streams across heterogeneous clients without access to ground-truth labels.<n>We propose Fed-ADE (Federated Adaptation with Distribution Shift Estimation), an unsupervised federated adaptation framework that leverages lightweight estimators of distribution dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T10:38:43Z)
• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Steering Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Incremental Face Presentation Attack Detection [62.89126207012712]
  Face Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) demands incremental learning to combat spoofing tactics and domains.<n>Privacy regulations forbid retaining past data, necessitating rehearsal-free learning (RF-IL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T04:30:11Z)
• Learning Causality for Longitudinal Data [1.2691047660244335]
  This thesis develops methods for causal inference and causal representation learning in high-dimensional, time-varying data.<n>The first contribution introduces the Causal Dynamic Variational Autoencoder (CDVAE), a model for estimating Individual Treatment Effects (ITEs)<n>The second contribution proposes an efficient framework for long-term counterfactual regression based on RNNs enhanced with Contrastive Predictive Coding ( CPC) and InfoMax.<n>The third contribution advances CRL by addressing how latent causes manifest in observed variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T16:51:49Z)
• Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
  contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z)
• Adapting to Fragmented and Evolving Data: A Fisher Information Perspective [0.0]
  FADE is a lightweight framework for robust learning under dynamic environments.<n>It employs a shift-aware regularization mechanism anchored in Fisher information geometry.<n>FADE operates online with fixed memory and no access to target labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T06:50:09Z)
• Advancing Reliable Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models under Visual Variations [67.35596444651037]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit remarkable zero-shot capabilities but struggle with distribution shifts in downstream tasks when labeled data is unavailable.<n>We propose a Reliable Test-time Adaptation (ReTA) method that enhances reliability from two perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T05:37:33Z)
• Generalized Incremental Learning under Concept Drift across Evolving Data Streams [32.62505920071586]
  Real-world data streams exhibit inherent non-stationarity characterized by concept drift, posing significant challenges for adaptive learning systems.<n>We formalize Generalized Incremental Learning under Concept Drift (GILCD), characterizing the joint evolution of distributions and label spaces in open-environment streaming contexts.<n>We propose Calibrated Source-Free Adaptation (CSFA), which fuses emerging prototypes with base representations, enabling stable new-class identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T04:36:24Z)
• datadriftR: An R Package for Concept Drift Detection in Predictive Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces drifter, an R package designed to detect concept drift.<n>It proposes a novel method called Profile Drift Detection (PDD) that enables both drift detection and an enhanced understanding of the cause behind the drift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T20:59:49Z)
• PseudoNeg-MAE: Self-Supervised Point Cloud Learning using Conditional Pseudo-Negative Embeddings [55.55445978692678]
  PseudoNeg-MAE enhances global feature representation of point cloud masked autoencoders by making them both discriminative and sensitive to transformations.<n>We propose a novel loss that explicitly penalizes invariant collapse, enabling the network to capture richer transformation cues while preserving discriminative representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T07:57:21Z)
• AiGAS-dEVL: An Adaptive Incremental Neural Gas Model for Drifting Data Streams under Extreme Verification Latency [6.7236795813629]
  In streaming setups data flows are affected by factors that yield non-stationarities in the patterns (concept drift) We propose a novel approach, AiGAS-dEVL, which relies on growing neural gas to characterize the distributions of all concepts detected within the stream over time. Our approach exposes that the online analysis of the behavior of these points over time facilitates the definition of the evolution of concepts in the feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T14:04:57Z)
• LaPLACE: Probabilistic Local Model-Agnostic Causal Explanations [1.0370398945228227]
  We introduce LaPLACE-explainer, designed to provide probabilistic cause-and-effect explanations for machine learning models. The LaPLACE-Explainer component leverages the concept of a Markov blanket to establish statistical boundaries between relevant and non-relevant features. Our approach offers causal explanations and outperforms LIME and SHAP in terms of local accuracy and consistency of explained features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T04:09:59Z)
• Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty Awareness [61.827054365139645]
  Variational Autoencoder (VAE) approximates the posterior of latent variables based on amortized variational inference. We propose an alternative model, DU-VAE, for learning a more Diverse and less Uncertain latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T07:58:13Z)
• Which Invariance Should We Transfer? A Causal Minimax Learning Approach [18.71316951734806]
  We present a comprehensive minimax analysis from a causal perspective. We propose an efficient algorithm to search for the subset with minimal worst-case risk. The effectiveness and efficiency of our methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T09:07:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.