CoFineLLM: Conformal Finetuning of LLMs for Language-Instructed Robot Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06575v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:38:25 GMT
• Title: CoFineLLM: Conformal Finetuning of LLMs for Language-Instructed Robot Planning
• Authors: Jun Wang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Yiannis Kantaros,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as planners for language-instructed agents.<n>They often produce overconfident yet wrong outputs.<n>We introduce CoFineLLM, the first CP-aware finetuning framework for LLM-based planners.
• Score: 31.40208712412789
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as planners for language-instructed agents, generating sequences of actions to accomplish natural language tasks. However, their reliability remains a challenge, especially in long-horizon tasks, since they often produce overconfident yet wrong outputs. Conformal Prediction (CP) has been leveraged to address this issue by wrapping LLM outputs into prediction sets that contain the correct action with a user-defined confidence. When the prediction set is a singleton, the planner executes that action; otherwise, it requests help from a user. This has led to LLM-based planners that can ensure plan correctness with a user-defined probability. However, as LLMs are trained in an uncertainty-agnostic manner, without awareness of prediction sets, they tend to produce unnecessarily large sets, particularly at higher confidence levels, resulting in frequent human interventions limiting autonomous deployment. To address this, we introduce CoFineLLM (Conformal Finetuning for LLMs), the first CP-aware finetuning framework for LLM-based planners that explicitly reduces prediction-set size and, in turn, the need for user interventions. We evaluate our approach on multiple language-instructed robot planning problems and show consistent improvements over uncertainty-aware and uncertainty-agnostic finetuning baselines in terms of prediction-set size, and help rates. Finally, we demonstrate robustness of our method to out-of-distribution scenarios in hardware experiments.

Related papers

• Reasoning with Confidence: Efficient Verification of LLM Reasoning Steps via Uncertainty Heads [104.9566359759396]
  We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on data-driven uncertainty scores.<n>Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their uncertainty and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T03:38:29Z)
• Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation [68.106428321492]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding.<n>LLMs hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans.<n>We present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T10:26:58Z)
• Self-Corrective Task Planning by Inverse Prompting with Large Language Models [9.283971287618261]
  We introduce InversePrompt, a novel self-corrective task planning approach.<n>Our method incorporates reasoning steps to provide clear, interpretable feedback.<n>Results on benchmark datasets show an average 16.3% higher success rate over existing LLM-based task planning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T13:35:51Z)
• Evaluating Human Trust in LLM-Based Planners: A Preliminary Study [23.295326953639467]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for planning tasks.<n>This study compares human trust in LLM-based planners with classical planners through a user study in a Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T17:10:52Z)
• PredictaBoard: Benchmarking LLM Score Predictability [50.47497036981544]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail unpredictably.<n>This poses a significant challenge to ensuring their safe deployment.<n>We present PredictaBoard, a novel collaborative benchmarking framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T10:52:38Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Evaluating Uncertainty-based Failure Detection for Closed-Loop LLM Planners [10.746821861109176]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable performance as zero-shot task planners for robotic tasks.<n>However, the open-loop nature of previous works makes LLM-based planning error-prone and fragile.<n>In this work, we introduce a framework for closed-loop LLM-based planning called KnowLoop, backed by an uncertainty-based MLLMs failure detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T12:52:06Z)
• Probabilistically Correct Language-based Multi-Robot Planning using Conformal Prediction [11.614036749291216]
  We introduce a new distributed multi-robot planner called S-ATLAS for Safe plAnning for Teams of Language-instructed AgentS. We show that the proposed planner can achieve user-specified task success rates, assuming successful plan execution. We provide comparative experiments against related works showing that our method is significantly more computational efficient and achieves lower help rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T15:02:44Z)
• Introspective Planning: Aligning Robots' Uncertainty with Inherent Task Ambiguity [0.659529078336196]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit advanced reasoning skills, enabling robots to comprehend natural language instructions and strategically plan high-level actions.<n>LLMs hallucination may result in robots confidently executing plans that are misaligned with user goals or even unsafe in critical scenarios.<n>We propose introspective planning, a systematic approach that align LLM's uncertainty with the inherent ambiguity of the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T16:40:59Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Planners [85.03486419424647]
  KnowNo is a framework for measuring and aligning the uncertainty of large language models. KnowNo builds on the theory of conformal prediction to provide statistical guarantees on task completion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T21:25:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.